World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
34
Citations
4711
World Ranking
3121
National Ranking
87

Theo Offerman publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo Offerman sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 111 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Theo Offerman D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo Offerman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Theo Offerman is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research contributions span several topics within behavioral and experimental economics, focusing notably on decision-making processes, risk attitudes, and economic valuations.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory? (2020, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty)
  • Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes? (2021, The Review of Economics and Statistics)
  • Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes? (2020, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • On the effect of anchoring on valuations when the anchor is transparently uninformative (2020, Journal of the Economic Science Association)
  • Morals in Multi-Unit Markets (2024, Journal of the European Economic Association)

Theo Offerman frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Jeroen van de Ven
  • Giorgia Romagnoli
  • Boris van Leeuwen
  • Andreas Ziegler
  • Uri Gneezy

Their publications are commonly featured in several academic venues, among which are:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • The Review of Economics and Statistics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

The research fields and subfields related to their work include:

  • Safety Research
  • General Decision Sciences
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Organic Chemistry

Among the main topics covered in their work are:

  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Game Theory and Applications

Best Publications

  • Value orientations, expectations and voluntary contributions in public goods

    T.J.S. Offerman;J.H. Sonnemans;A.J.H.C. Schram

  • Public good provision and public bad prevention: the effect of framing

    J.H. Sonnemans;A.J.H.C. Schram;T.J.S. Offerman

  • Hurting hurts more than helping helps

    T.J.S. Offerman

  • Imitation and Belief Learning in an Oligopoly Experiment

    T.J.S. Offerman;J.J.M. Potters;J.H. Sonnemans

  • A truth serum for non-Bayesians : correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes

    T.J.S. Offerman;J.H. Sonnemans;G. van de Kuilen;P.P. Wakker

  • Competitive Bidding in Auctions with Private and Common Values

    Jacob K. Goeree;Theo Offerman

  • Strategic Behavior in Public Good Games: When Partners Drift Apart.

    J.H. Sonnemans;A.J.H.C. Schram;T.J.S. Offerman

  • Efficiency in Auctions with Private and Common Values: An Experimental Study

    Jacob K. Goeree;Theo Offerman

  • Learning by experience and learning by imitating successful others.

    Theo Offerman;Joep Sonnemans

  • Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory

    Gary Charness;Thomas Garcia;Thomas Garcia;Theo Offerman;Marie Claire Villeval

  • What's Causing Overreaction? An Experimental Investigation of Recency and the Hot-hand Effect*

    Theo Offerman;Joep Sonnemans

  • Does Auctioning of Entry Licences Induce Collusion? An Experimental Study

    T.J.S. Offerman;J.J.M. Potters

  • Encouraging compliance: bonuses versus fines in inspection games

    D. Nosenzo;T. Offerman;M. Sefton;A. van der Veen

  • Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?

    Benjamin Enke;Uri Gneezy;Brian Hall;David C. Martin

  • Noisy signaling: Theory and experiment

    Thomas de Haan;Theo Offerman;Randolph Sloof

  • Fighting collusion in auctions: An experimental investigation

    Audrey Hu;Theo Offerman;Sander Onderstal

  • Hurting Hurts More Than Helping Helps: The Role of the Self-Serving Bias

    T.J.S. Offerman

  • Imitation and luck: an experimental study on social sampling

    Theo Offerman;Andrew Schotter

  • Demand reduction and preemptive bidding in multi-unit license auctions

    Jacob K. Goeree;Theo Offerman;Randolph Sloof

  • Quantal response models in step-level public good games

    T.J.S. Offerman;A.J.H.C. Schram;J.H. Sonnemans

  • Ethical Free Riding: When Honest People Find Dishonest Partners.

    Jörg Gross;Margarita Leib;Theo Offerman;Shaul Shalvi

  • Beliefs and decision rules in public good games

    T.J.S. Offerman

  • Does auctioning of entry licences induce collusions? An experimental study

    T.J.S. Offerman;Jan Potters

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Potters
Jan Potters Tilburg University
Joep Sonnemans
Joep Sonnemans University of Amsterdam
Jacob K. Goeree
Jacob K. Goeree University of New South Wales
Werner Güth
Werner Güth Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Andrew Schotter
Andrew Schotter New York University
Uri Gneezy
Uri Gneezy University of California, San Diego
Charles N. Noussair
Charles N. Noussair University of Arizona
Martin Sefton
Martin Sefton University of Nottingham
Marie Claire Villeval
Marie Claire Villeval Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Andreas Ziegler
Andreas Ziegler University of Kassel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance in the USA opens up various career opportunities and potential for further education. Many students and professionals are now turning to online degrees for added flexibility and affordability. If you’re seeking to expand your skill set, consider exploring programs related to communication or business.

For those who want to enhance their organizational and leadership skills, pursuing an online project management degree can be a great step. Project management expertise is highly valued in finance, consulting, and many corporate sectors.

If your interests are broader or you wish to fast-track your business education, a list of one year mba programs may be ideal. These programs offer a comprehensive business curriculum in an accelerated format, suitable for those eager to advance quickly.

Entrepreneurship is also a popular pathway among Economics and Finance graduates. Consider an affordable online mba entrepreneurship program to gain practical skills for launching your own venture.

Communication remains a core competency in all business roles. An online master's programs communications can further enhance your ability to influence, negotiate, and lead teams in any economic or financial career.

Best Scientists Citing Theo Offerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles