D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 34 Citations 6,294 104 World Ranking 3364 National Ranking 128

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Microeconomics
  • Macroeconomics

His primary scientific interests are in Microeconomics, Social psychology, Voting behavior, Competition and Set. His work on Public good, Team production and Incentive as part of general Microeconomics study is frequently linked to Variable and Work, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. His work on Affect and Punishment as part of general Social psychology study is frequently linked to Hazard, Economic decision making and Laboratory experiment, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Frans van Winden works mostly in the field of Affect, limiting it down to concerns involving Reciprocity and, occasionally, Interpersonal ties. Frans van Winden interconnects Social relation, Consumption, Public economics and Public goods game in the investigation of issues within Interpersonal ties. Set combines with fields such as Identification and Spatial model in his work.

His most cited work include:

  • Conditional Cooperation and Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods (623 citations)
  • Emotional Hazard in a Power-to-take Experiment (261 citations)
  • Incentive systems in a real effort experiment (224 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Social psychology, Microeconomics, Interpersonal ties, Competition and Public good. Frans van Winden incorporates Social psychology and Endowment in his research. The study incorporates disciplines such as Public economics and Set in addition to Microeconomics.

Frans van Winden combines subjects such as Social relation, Cognitive psychology, Empathy, Reciprocity and Interpersonal relationship with his study of Interpersonal ties. His work carried out in the field of Competition brings together such families of science as Social dynamics and Complete information. His research integrates issues of Social value orientations and Positive economics in his study of Public good.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (50.28%)
  • Microeconomics (33.52%)
  • Interpersonal ties (17.88%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?

  • Social psychology (50.28%)
  • Microeconomics (33.52%)
  • Public good (17.88%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Frans van Winden mainly focuses on Social psychology, Microeconomics, Public good, Rent-seeking and Appropriation. His specific area of interest is Social psychology, where Frans van Winden studies Interpersonal ties. His Interpersonal ties study incorporates themes from Social relation, Affect, Prosocial behavior and Neural substrate.

His work in Affect covers topics such as Compliance which are related to areas like Competition. His study on Incentive is often connected to Endowment as part of broader study in Microeconomics. Frans van Winden has researched Public good in several fields, including Positive economics and Level playing field.

Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • 'Let me dream on!' Anticipatory emotions and preference for timing in lotteries (31 citations)
  • Oxytocin Tempers Calculated Greed but not Impulsive Defense in Predator-Prey Contests (25 citations)
  • ON THE BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS OF CRIME (19 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social psychology
  • Microeconomics
  • Cognition

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Social psychology, Interpersonal ties, Appropriation, Social relation and Prosocial behavior. The various areas that Frans van Winden examines in his Social psychology study include Dream, Lottery and Resolution. His Interpersonal ties research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Competition, Political economy, Affect and Compliance.

His Appropriation study spans across into subjects like Production, Rent-seeking, Overall efficiency, Public relations and Microeconomics. His Social relation research includes themes of Interpersonal communication, Social decision making, Empathy, Neural correlates of consciousness and Neural substrate. His Prosocial behavior research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Cognitive psychology, Representation, Posterior cingulate, Prefrontal cortex and Brain mapping.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Conditional Cooperation and Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods

Claudia Keser;Frans A.A.M. van Winden.
The Scandinavian Journal of Economics (2000)

924 Citations

Emotional Hazard in a Power-to-take Experiment

Ronald Bosman;Frans Van Winden.
The Economic Journal (2002)

435 Citations

Lobbying and asymmetric information

Jan Potters;Frans van Winden.
Public Choice (1992)

382 Citations

Incentive systems in a real effort experiment

Frans van Dijk;Joep Sonnemans;Frans van Winden.
European Economic Review (2001)

382 Citations

An empirical analysis of self-employment in the Netherlands

Gerrit de Wit;Frans A. A. M. van Winden.
Economics Letters (1989)

335 Citations

Social Ties in a public good experiment

Frans van Dijk;Joep Sonnemans;Frans van Winden.
Journal of Public Economics (2002)

242 Citations

An experimental examination of rational rent-seeking

Jan Potters;Casper G de Vries;Frans van Winden.
European Journal of Political Economy (1998)

223 Citations

Incentive Systems in a Real Effort Experiment

Frans van Winden;Frans van Dijk;Joep Sonnemans.
Social Science Research Network (2000)

177 Citations

The impact of real effort and emotions in the power-to-take game

Ronald Bosman;Matthias Sutter;Matthias Sutter;Frans van Winden.
Journal of Economic Psychology (2005)

153 Citations

Gender pairing and bargaining—Beware the same sex!

Matthias Sutter;Matthias Sutter;Ronald Bosman;Martin G. Kocher;Martin G. Kocher;Frans van Winden.
Experimental Economics (2009)

152 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Frans van Winden

Roman M. Sheremeta

Roman M. Sheremeta

Case Western Reserve University

Publications: 61

Simon Gächter

Simon Gächter

University of Nottingham

Publications: 49

Matthias Sutter

Matthias Sutter

Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

Publications: 49

Martin G. Kocher

Martin G. Kocher

University of Vienna

Publications: 36

Arno Riedl

Arno Riedl

Maastricht University

Publications: 30

Ernst Fehr

Ernst Fehr

University of Zurich

Publications: 28

Werner Güth

Werner Güth

Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

Publications: 28

Armin Falk

Armin Falk

BRIQ Institute on Behavior and Inequality

Publications: 26

Jeffrey P. Carpenter

Jeffrey P. Carpenter

Middlebury College

Publications: 22

Carsten K. W. De Dreu

Carsten K. W. De Dreu

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 20

Urs Fischbacher

Urs Fischbacher

University of Konstanz

Publications: 19

Marie Claire Villeval

Marie Claire Villeval

Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

Publications: 18

Arye L. Hillman

Arye L. Hillman

Bar-Ilan University

Publications: 17

Jean-Robert Tyran

Jean-Robert Tyran

University of Copenhagen

Publications: 17

Bruno S. Frey

Bruno S. Frey

University of Basel

Publications: 17

Peter Martinsson

Peter Martinsson

University of Gothenburg

Publications: 16

Trending Scientists

Richard Buchner

Richard Buchner

University of Regensburg

Son-Jong Hwang

Son-Jong Hwang

California Institute of Technology

Zhenduo Cui

Zhenduo Cui

Tianjin University

Beverly Paigen

Beverly Paigen

University of Pennsylvania

Joe D. Wallace

Joe D. Wallace

New Mexico State University

Michael W. Quick

Michael W. Quick

University of Southern California

Mark R. Schoeberl

Mark R. Schoeberl

Science and Technology Corporation (United States)

James P. Lassoie

James P. Lassoie

Cornell University

Zhu Liu

Zhu Liu

Tsinghua University

Barbara A. Dworetzky

Barbara A. Dworetzky

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Francesco Ferraguti

Francesco Ferraguti

Innsbruck Medical University

D A McCrea

D A McCrea

University of Manitoba

Neil A. Martin

Neil A. Martin

University of California, Los Angeles

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Jukka S. Jurvelin

Jukka S. Jurvelin

University of Eastern Finland

Dmitri E. Kharzeev

Dmitri E. Kharzeev

Brookhaven National Laboratory

Something went wrong. Please try again later.