World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
7123
World Ranking
6189
National Ranking
245

Frans van Winden publications per year

1978: 1 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publications 1981: 1 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publications 1995: 1 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publications 2020: 1 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1978 2025

124 publications in total across all disciplines

Frans van Winden publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans van Winden sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 121 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Frans van Winden D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans van Winden sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frans van Winden is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans several interconnected fields primarily within neuroscience, social sciences, and psychology. The scientist's work focuses on topics such as neural and behavioral psychology studies, the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, experimental behavioral economics, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, evolutionary psychology, and evolutionary game theory related to cooperation.

Their recent publications include two notable papers. The first is titled "Neurocognitive Underpinnings of Aggressive Predation in Economic Contests", published in 2020 in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. The second paper, "The informational affective tie mechanism: on the role of uncertainty, context, and attention in caring", was published in 2023 in the Journal of Economic Psychology. These papers contribute to understanding cognitive and emotional mechanisms underlying economic and social behavior.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Michael Rojek-Giffin
  • Maël Lebreton
  • H. Steven Scholte
  • K. Richard Ridderinkhof
  • Carsten K. W. De Dreu

These collaborations are reflective of their interdisciplinary approach, working across cognitive neuroscience, psychology, and social sciences. The main venues for their publications are the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and the Journal of Economic Psychology, each featuring at least one of their contributions.

Their subfields of study highlight a broad research scope, encompassing cognitive neuroscience, safety research, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as sociology and political science. This diversity indicates a comprehensive approach to exploring human behavior from multiple scientific angles.

Best Publications

  • Conditional Cooperation and Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods

    Claudia Keser;Frans A.A.M. van Winden

  • Emotional Hazard in a Power-to-take Experiment

    Ronald Bosman;Frans Van Winden

  • Lobbying and asymmetric information

    Jan Potters;Frans van Winden

  • Incentive systems in a real effort experiment

    Frans van Dijk;Joep Sonnemans;Frans van Winden

  • An empirical analysis of self-employment in the Netherlands

    Gerrit de Wit;Frans A. A. M. van Winden

  • Social Ties in a public good experiment

    Frans van Dijk;Joep Sonnemans;Frans van Winden

  • An experimental examination of rational rent-seeking

    Jan Potters;Casper G de Vries;Frans van Winden

  • Gender pairing and bargaining—Beware the same sex!

    Matthias Sutter;Matthias Sutter;Ronald Bosman;Martin G. Kocher;Martin G. Kocher;Frans van Winden

  • The impact of real effort and emotions in the power-to-take game

    Ronald Bosman;Matthias Sutter;Matthias Sutter;Frans van Winden

  • Reciprocity and emotions in bargaining using physiological and self-report measures

    Gershon Ben-Shakhar;Gary Bornstein;Astrid Hopfensitz;Frans van Winden

  • Dynamics of Social Ties and Local Public Good Provision

    Frans van Dijk;Frans van Winden

  • Social ties and coordination on negative reciprocity: The role of affect

    Ernesto Reuben;Frans van Winden

  • Campaign expenditures, contributions and direct endorsements: The strategic use of information and money to influence voter behavior

    Jan Potters;Randolph Sloof;Frans van Winden

  • Incentive Systems in a Real Effort Experiment

    Frans van Winden;Frans van Dijk;Joep Sonnemans

  • On the economic theory of interest groups: Towards a group frame of reference in political economics

    Frans van Winden

  • Professionals and students in a lobbying experiment. Professional rules of conduct and subject surrogacy

    Jan Potters;Frans van Winden

  • On the dynamics of social ties structures in groups

    Joep Sonnemans;Frans van Dijk;Frans van Winden

  • MODELLING POLITICAL PRESSURE AS TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION

    Jan Potters;Frans Van Winden

  • Competitive rivalry, social disposition, and subjective well-being: an experiment

    Jordi Brandts;Arno Riedl;Frans van Winden

  • Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment

    Ronald Bosman;Heike Hennig-Schmidt;Frans van Winden

  • AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF SELF-EMPLOYMENT IN THE NETHERLANDS

    G. de Wit;F. Winden

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Potters
Jan Potters Tilburg University
Joep Sonnemans
Joep Sonnemans University of Amsterdam
Martin G. Kocher
Martin G. Kocher University of Vienna
Arno Riedl
Arno Riedl Maastricht University
Matthias Sutter
Matthias Sutter Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
K. Richard Ridderinkhof
K. Richard Ridderinkhof University of Amsterdam
Jordi Brandts
Jordi Brandts Instituto de Análisis Económico
Gary Bornstein
Gary Bornstein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Gershon Ben-Shakhar Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Carsten K. W. De Dreu University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for flexible, high-quality education in Social Sciences and Humanities is growing rapidly. Many students are turning to online programs that fit their schedules and allow for accelerated learning. For those seeking quick advancement, 1 year master's programs offer an intensive yet manageable route to a graduate degree, helping students start new careers or move up in their current roles within just 12 months.

Undergraduates can benefit from accelerated degree programs, which are designed to help you earn your bachelor’s faster than traditional formats. These pathways are ideal for motivated learners eager to minimize time and costs.

Specializations like social work and behavioral analysis are also accessible online. If you’re interested in helping others, msw programs online prepare graduates for rewarding roles in mental health, schools, and communities. Meanwhile, those pursuing careers in applied behavioral analysis may want to explore the bcba certification online cost to find affordable options for professional certification.

With so many online Social Sciences and Humanities pathways, students can find programs that fit their timelines, budgets, and long-term goals.

Best Scientists Citing Frans van Winden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles