World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 35 6646 45 53 7403

Gary Bornstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gary Bornstein between 1987 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gary Bornstein published across 28 years, from 1987 to 2014, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 2002. 2 of the 54 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 2002. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication
1987 2014

54 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gary Bornstein: publications per year, 1987 to 2014
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 2
1989 3
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 3
1994 4
1995 0
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 5
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 5
2008 5
2009 1
2010 2
2011 1
2012 2
2013 1
2014 1
Total 54
Download as CSV

Gary Bornstein publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Bornstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 44–53 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 53 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28 53
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Gary Bornstein D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Bornstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243 35
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Gary Bornstein is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. They are an active researcher associated with this institution.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, main research topics, or awards are currently documented for this researcher. Consequently, specific details about their research output or areas of expertise are not available.

As a researcher at a major academic institution, it is likely that their work contributes to ongoing projects or collaborations within their department, although no publicly listed publications or formal records have been provided here.

The absence of recorded publications or topics prevents further specification of research interests or scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Intergroup conflict: individual, group, and collective interests

    Gary Bornstein

  • “In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup Conflict A New Game Paradigm

    Nir Halevy;Gary Bornstein;Lilach Sagiv

  • Individual and Group Behavior in the Ultimatum Game: Are Groups More "Rational" Players?

    Gary Bornstein;Ilan Yaniv

  • Constructive Intergroup Competition as a Solution to the Free Rider Problem: A Field Experiment

    Ido Erev;Gary Bornstein;Rachely Galili

  • Cooperation in Intergroup and Single-Group Social Dilemmas

    Gary Bornstein;Meyrav Ben-Yossef

  • The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: an experimental study ✩

    Gary Bornstein;Uri Gneezy;Rosemarie Nagel

  • The Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Contributes to Prosocial Fund Allocations in the Dictator Game and the Social Value Orientations Task

    Salomon Israel;Elad Lerer;Idan Shalev;Florina Uzefovsky

  • The free-rider problem in intergroup conflicts over step-level and continuous public goods.

    Gary Bornstein

  • Individual and group decisions in the centipede game: Are groups more “rational” players?

    Gary Bornstein;Tamar Kugler;Anthony Ziegelmeyer

  • Individual and Group Behavior in the Ultimatum Game: Are Groups More “Rational” Players?

    Unknown

  • “In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” in Repeated Interaction Between Groups

    Nir Halevy;Ori Weisel;Gary Bornstein

  • Trust between individuals and groups: Groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy

    Tamar Kugler;Gary Bornstein;Martin Kocher;Matthias Sutter

  • Intergroup Competition for the Provision of Binary Public Goods

    Amnon Rapoport;Gary Bornstein

  • Cooperation in Intergroup, N-Person, and Two-Person Games of Chicken

    Gary Bornstein;David Budescu;Shmuel Zamir

  • Molecular genetic studies of the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor (AVPR1a) and the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) in human behaviour: from autism to altruism with some notes in between.

    Salomon Israel;Elad Lerer;Idan Shalev;Florina Uzefovsky

  • Intergroup competition for public goods: Effects of unequal resources and relative group size.

    Amnon Rapoport;Gary Bornstein;Ido Erev

  • Oxytocin, but not Vasopressin, Increases both Parochial and Universal Altruism

    Salomon Israel;Ori Weisel;Richard P. Ebstein;Gary Bornstein

  • Reciprocity and emotions in bargaining using physiological and self-report measures

    Gershon Ben-Shakhar;Gary Bornstein;Astrid Hopfensitz;Frans van Winden

  • The Role of Communication in Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity

    Chester A. Insko;John Schopler;Stephen M. Drigotas;Kenneth A. Graetz

  • Relative deprivation and intergroup competition

    Nir Halevy;Eileen Y. Chou;Taya R. Cohen;Gary Bornstein

  • Intergroup competition as a structural solution to social dilemmas.

    Gary Bornstein;Ido Erev;Orna Rosen

  • "Ingroup Love" and "Outgroup Hate" as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup Conflict: A New Game Paradigm

    Nir Halevy;Gary Bornstein;Lilach Sagiv

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard P. Ebstein
Richard P. Ebstein Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Salomon Israel
Salomon Israel Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ido Erev
Ido Erev Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Amnon Rapoport
Amnon Rapoport University of Arizona
Lilach Sagiv
Lilach Sagiv Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ariel Knafo
Ariel Knafo Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Uri Gneezy
Uri Gneezy University of California, San Diego
Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Gershon Ben-Shakhar Hebrew University of Jerusalem
David V. Budescu
David V. Budescu Fordham University
Frans van Winden
Frans van Winden University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and rewarding career pathways. Many students are seeking flexible and accelerated programs that fit their busy schedules and diverse backgrounds.

For those looking to fast-track their entry into social work, 1 year msw programs online no bsw allow motivated individuals without a Bachelor of Social Work to earn a Master’s degree quickly. Similarly, an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology offers a flexible and efficient path for students interested in understanding human behavior and launching careers in mental health, research, or counseling.

Professional counseling and therapy are popular areas of growth. Choosing cacrep online counseling programs ensures your degree meets top accreditation standards, which is vital for state licensure and credibility. If your passion is helping couples and families, you may consider affordable online mft programs that provide specialized training and direct pathways to licensure.

These online options offer flexibility, affordability, and the credentials needed to pursue impactful careers addressing today’s most pressing social and mental health needs.

Best Scientists Citing Gary Bornstein

Recently Published Articles