World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
20330
World Ranking
2923
National Ranking
1680

Norbert L. Kerr publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norbert L. Kerr sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 200 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Norbert L. Kerr D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norbert L. Kerr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Norbert L. Kerr is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and social sciences, focusing on various subfields and topics that intersect behavioral, social, and gender-related issues.

Their recent research contributions include two published papers. One paper, published in 2021 in the Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, is titled "Attenuation of the Köhler Effect in Racially Dissimilar Partnered Exercise Reversed Using Team Identity Strategy." The other, published in 2024 in Small Group Research, is titled "Exploring the "Fourth Drawback": Overlap Between Mediator and Criterion in Mediation Analysis."

Kerr has published mainly in the following venues:

  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Small Group Research

Their coauthors reflect diverse collaborations with frequent partners including:

  • Stephen Samendinger
  • Deborah L. Feltz
  • Emery J. Max
  • Tayo Moss
  • Joseph Cesario

Kerr's primary fields of study are:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

They have contributed to several subfields such as:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Gender Studies

Their research topics reflect a broad interest in social behavior and psychological aspects, including:

  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

Best Publications

  • HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known:

    Norbert L. Kerr

  • Group performance and decision making.

    Norbert L. Kerr;R. Scott Tindale

  • Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects

    Norbert L. Kerr;Steven E. Bruun

  • Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis

    Norbert L. Kerr

  • An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations

    Harold H. Kelley;John G. Holmes;Norbert L. Kerr;Harry T. Reis

  • Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups.

    Norbert L. Kerr;Robert J. MacCoun;Geoffrey P. Kramer

  • Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemma.

    Norbert L. Kerr;Cynthia M. Kaufman-Gilliland

  • Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas.

    Norbert L. Kerr

  • Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: jurors' bias for leniency.

    Robert J. MacCoun;Norbert L. Kerr

  • Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias

    Geoffrey P. Kramer;Norbert L. Kerr;John S. Carroll

  • Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action

    Robert S. Baron;Norbert L. Kerr;Norman Miller

  • Ringelmann Revisited Alternative Explanations for the Social Loafing Effect

    Norbert L. Kerr;Steven E. Bruun

  • The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules.

    James H. Davis;Norbert L. Kerr;Robert S. Atkin;Robert Holt

  • Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments.

    Norbert L. Kerr;Robert W. Hymes;Alonzo B. Anderson;James E. Weathers

  • "Me versus just us versus us all" categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas.

    Arjaan P. Wit;Norbert L. Kerr

  • Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.

    Norbert L. Kerr;Robert S. Atkin;Garold Stasser;David Meek

  • The Psychology of the courtroom

    Norbert L. Kerr;Robert M. Bray

  • Priming in-group favoritism: The impact of normative scripts in the minimal group paradigm.

    Guido Hertel;Norbert L. Kerr

  • Motivation gains in performance groups: paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Köhler effect.

    Guido Hertel;Norbert L. Kerr;Lawrence A. Messé

  • Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups.

    G Stasser;Norbert L. Kerr;G.H. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. M. Van Lange
Paul A. M. Van Lange Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Caryl E. Rusbult
Caryl E. Rusbult Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Harold H. Kelley
Harold H. Kelley University of California, Los Angeles
Harry T. Reis
Harry T. Reis University of Rochester
John G. Holmes
John G. Holmes University of Waterloo
Deborah L. Feltz
Deborah L. Feltz Michigan State University
Robert J. MacCoun
Robert J. MacCoun Stanford University
Guido Hertel
Guido Hertel University of Münster
R. Scott Tindale
R. Scott Tindale Loyola University Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology online offers flexible learning options for students across the United States. Accredited programs are available in many states, each with its own strengths and areas of focus. For example, students looking to advance in mental health, counseling, or research often turn to the best online psychology master's degree rankings in New York to find top-rated master's programs tailored to their career goals.

In Pennsylvania, learners benefit from a diverse range of online psychology programs in Pennsylvania that prepare graduates for work in education, clinical settings, and organizational environments. Meanwhile, prospective students in California can explore the best online psychology program rankings in San Diego for specialized options, including applied psychology and forensic studies.

Texas is another leading state, offering a range of programs featured among the best online psychology degree rankings in Texas. These programs can be a gateway to careers in counseling, human services, or further graduate study. Exploring top online psychology programs by state helps students find the right fit to achieve their professional aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Norbert L. Kerr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles