World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ronan M. T. Fleming

Ronan M. T. Fleming

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
12679
World Ranking
9061
National Ranking
157

Ronan M. T. Fleming publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronan M. T. Fleming sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 82 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ronan M. T. Fleming D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronan M. T. Fleming sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronan M. T. Fleming is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a strong emphasis on Molecular Biology as a subfield. Additional subfields include Neurology, Physiology, Biomedical Engineering, and Biological Psychiatry.

The scientist's work encompasses various specialized topics such as:

  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders

Among their recent papers are the following publications:

  • MEMOTE for standardized genome-scale metabolic model testing, 2020, Nature Biotechnology
  • SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models, 2020, Molecular Systems Biology
  • Genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of 7,302 human microorganisms for personalized medicine, 2023, Nature Biotechnology
  • Parkinson's disease-associated alterations of the gut microbiome predict disease-relevant changes in metabolic functions, 2020, BMC Biology
  • Personalized whole-body models integrate metabolism, physiology, and the gut microbiome, 2020, Molecular Systems Biology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Fleming include:

  • Ines Thiele (18 papers)
  • Thomas Hankemeier (10 papers)
  • German Preciat (8 papers)
  • Amy C. Harms (8 papers)
  • Almut Heinken (7 papers)

Fleming's work has been published extensively across several venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 11 publications
  • Nature Biotechnology with 3 publications
  • Bioinformatics with 3 publications
  • Molecular Systems Biology with 2 publications
  • arXiv (Cornell University) with 2 publications

Best Publications

  • Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0

    Jan Schellenberger;Richard Que;Ronan M T Fleming;Ines Thiele

  • Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0

    Laurent Heirendt;Sylvain Arreckx;Thomas Pfau;Sebastián N. Mendoza

  • A community-driven global reconstruction of human metabolism

    Ines Thiele;Neil Swainston;Ronan M T Fleming;Andreas Hoppe

  • Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices.

    Skarphedinn Halldorsson;Edinson Lucumi;Rafael Gómez-Sjöberg;Ronan M.T. Fleming

  • Generation of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for 773 members of the human gut microbiota

    Stefania Magnusdottir;Almut Katrin Heinken;Laura Kutt;Dmitry Ravcheev

  • Recon3D enables a three-dimensional view of gene variation in human metabolism.

    Elizabeth Brunk;Elizabeth Brunk;Swagatika Sahoo;Daniel C. Zielinski;Ali Altunkaya;Ali Altunkaya

  • MEMOTE for standardized genome-scale metabolic model testing

    Christian Lieven;Moritz Emanuel Beber;Brett G. Olivier;Frank T. Bergmann

  • The Virtual Metabolic Human database: integrating human and gut microbiome metabolism with nutrition and disease.

    Alberto Noronha;Jennifer Modamio;Yohan Jarosz;Elisabeth Guerard

  • Consistent estimation of Gibbs energy using component contributions

    Elad Noor;Hulda S. Haraldsdóttir;Ron Milo;Ronan M. T. Fleming

  • Reconstruction and Use of Microbial Metabolic Networks: the Core Escherichia coli Metabolic Model as an Educational Guide

    Jeffrey D. Orth;R. M. T. Fleming;Bernhard Ø. Palsson

  • Systematic assessment of secondary bile acid metabolism in gut microbes reveals distinct metabolic capabilities in inflammatory bowel disease.

    Almut Katrin Heinken;Dmitry Ravcheev;Federico Baldini;Laurent Heirendt

  • SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models

    Sarah M. Keating;Sarah M. Keating;Dagmar Waltemath;Matthias König;Fengkai Zhang

  • Genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli's transcriptional and translational machinery: a knowledge base, its mathematical formulation, and its functional characterization.

    Ines Thiele;Neema Jamshidi;Ronan M. T. Fleming;Bernhard Ø. Palsson

  • Personalized whole-body models integrate metabolism, physiology, and the gut microbiome.

    Ines Thiele;Swagatika Sahoo;Almut Heinken;Johannes Hertel;Johannes Hertel

  • A community effort towards a knowledge-base and mathematical model of the human pathogen Salmonella Typhimurium LT2

    Ines Thiele;Daniel R Hyduke;Benjamin Steeb;Guy Fankam

  • Integrated Analyses of Microbiome and Longitudinal Metabolome Data Reveal Microbial-Host Interactions on Sulfur Metabolism in Parkinson’s Disease

    Johannes Hertel;Johannes Hertel;Johannes Hertel;Amy C. Harms;Almut Heinken;Almut Heinken;Federico Baldini

  • The Microbiome Modeling Toolbox: from microbial interactions to personalized microbial communities

    Federico Baldini;Almut Katrin Heinken;Laurent Heirendt;Stefania Magnusdottir

  • Multiscale modeling of metabolism and macromolecular synthesis in E. coli and its application to the evolution of codon usage.

    Ines Thiele;Ines Thiele;Ronan M. T. Fleming;Richard Que;Aarash Bordbar

  • fastGapFill: efficient gap filling in metabolic networks

    Ines Thiele;Nikos Vlassis;Ronan M. T. Fleming

  • A systems biology approach to studying the role of microbes in human health.

    Ines Thiele;Almut Katrin Heinken;Ronan Mt Fleming

  • Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v3.0.

    Laurent Heirendt;Sylvain Arreckx;Thomas Pfau;Sebastián N. Mendoza

Frequent Co-Authors

Ines Thiele
Ines Thiele University of Galway
Bernhard O. Palsson
Bernhard O. Palsson University of California, San Diego
Michael A. Saunders
Michael A. Saunders Stanford University
Jens Nielsen
Jens Nielsen Chalmers University of Technology
Nathan E. Lewis
Nathan E. Lewis University of California, San Diego
Adam M. Feist
Adam M. Feist University of California, San Diego
Sang Yup Lee
Sang Yup Lee Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Thomas Hankemeier
Thomas Hankemeier Leiden University
Lars K. Nielsen
Lars K. Nielsen University of Queensland
Intawat Nookaew
Intawat Nookaew University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online programs. Many students look for degrees that blend technology with practical application, such as an mechanical engineering degree online cost-effective option, which provides valuable engineering skills and flexibility for working professionals.

If you are interested in the theoretical and scientific side, you might consider the best online physics degree. These programs often focus on analytical thinking, problem-solving, and foundational knowledge that can complement a computer science background.

The growing field of data analytics is also closely linked. Finding the cheapest data science degree online can boost your career prospects in industries like finance, tech, and healthcare.

For those targeting advanced roles in tech and innovation, an online master’s in electrical engineering degree could be a smart pathway. Each of these related programs supports your pursuit of a flexible and rewarding tech career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Ronan M. T. Fleming

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles