World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
45450
World Ranking
7567
National Ranking
3945

Brent L. Wood publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brent L. Wood sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 471 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Brent L. Wood D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brent L. Wood sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brent L. Wood is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research is primarily situated in the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Hematology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, and Oncology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to leukemia and childhood cancer, with principal areas of work encompassing:

  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • CAR-T cell therapy research

The publication history of Brent L. Wood includes frequent appearances in several key scientific journals, predominantly:

  • Blood
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Leukemia
  • Blood Advances
  • Haematologica

Some recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Brent L. Wood are:

  • "The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms," 2022, published in Leukemia
  • "The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms," 2022, published in Leukemia
  • "2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party," 2021, published in Blood
  • "The genomic landscape of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia," 2022, published in Nature Genetics
  • "Children's Oncology Group AALL0434: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Testing Nelarabine in Newly Diagnosed T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia," 2020, published in Journal of Clinical Oncology

Throughout their career, Brent L. Wood has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Mignon L. Loh
  • Meenakshi Devidas
  • Elizabeth A. Raetz
  • Stephen P. Hunger
  • Andrew J. Carroll

Best Publications

  • CD19 CAR–T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients

    Cameron J. Turtle;Laïla Aïcha Hanafi;Carolina Berger;Theodore A. Gooley

  • The genetic basis of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

    Jinghui Zhang;Li Ding;Linda Holmfeldt;Gang Wu

  • Blinatumomab versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    Hagop M Kantarjian;Anthony Stein;Nicola Gökbuget;Adele K. Fielding

  • Blood cell origin of circulating microRNAs: a cautionary note for cancer biomarker studies.

    Colin C. Pritchard;Evan Kroh;Brent Wood;Jason D. Arroyo

  • Immunotherapy of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with a defined ratio of CD8+ and CD4+ CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells

    Cameron J. Turtle;Cameron J. Turtle;Laila-Aicha Hanafi;Carolina Berger;Carolina Berger;Michael Hudecek

  • Adoptive immunotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma using genetically modified autologous CD20-specific T cells.

    Brian G. Till;Brian G. Till;Michael C. Jensen;Jinjuan Wang;Eric Y. Chen

  • An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: The Clinical Utility of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cellular Analysis in Interstitial Lung Disease

    Keith C. Meyer;Ganesh Raghu;Robert P. Baughman;Kevin K. Brown

  • Minimal/measurable residual disease in AML: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party.

    Gerrit J. Schuurhuis;Michael Heuser;Sylvie Freeman;Marie Christine Béne

  • The genomic landscape of pediatric and young adult T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Yu Liu;John Easton;Ying Shao;Jamie Maciaszek

  • Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells in healthy volunteers by AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist.

    W. Conrad Liles;W. Conrad Liles;Hal E. Broxmeyer;Hal E. Broxmeyer;Elin Rodger;Elin Rodger;Brent Wood;Brent Wood

  • The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Linda Holmfeldt;Lei Wei;Ernesto Diaz-Flores;Michael Walsh

  • Durable Molecular Remissions in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated With CD19-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor–Modified T Cells After Failure of Ibrutinib

    Cameron J. Turtle;Kevin A. Hay;Laïla-Aïcha Hanafi;Daniel Li

  • Using synthetic templates to design an unbiased multiplex PCR assay

    Christopher S. Carlson;Ryan O. Emerson;Anna M. Sherwood;Cindy Desmarais

  • Increased erythrocyte phosphatidylserine exposure in sickle cell disease: flow-cytometric measurement and clinical associations

    Brent L. Wood;Donald F. Gibson;Jonathan F. Tait

  • Unmetabolized Folic Acid in Plasma Is Associated with Reduced Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity among Postmenopausal Women

    Aron M. Troen;Breeana Mitchell;Breeana Mitchell;Bess Sorensen;Mark H. Wener

  • Identification of a human heme exporter that is essential for erythropoiesis.

    John G. Quigley;Zhantao Yang;Mark T. Worthington;John D. Phillips

  • Impact of Pretransplantation Minimal Residual Disease, As Detected by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry, on Outcome of Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Roland B. Walter;Ted A. Gooley;Brent L. Wood;Filippo Milano

  • 2021 Update Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: European LeukemiaNet Working Party Consensus Document.

    Michael Heuser;Sylvie D Freeman;Gert J Ossenkoppele;Francesco Buccisano

  • PAX5 -driven subtypes of B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Zhaohui Gu;Michelle L. Churchman;Kathryn G. Roberts;Ian Moore

  • Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Clinical Outcome in Pediatric and Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Meta-analysis.

    Donald A. Berry;Shouhao Zhou;Howard Higley;Lata Mukundan

Frequent Co-Authors

Mignon L. Loh
Mignon L. Loh University of California, San Francisco
Stephen P. Hunger
Stephen P. Hunger University of Pennsylvania
Meenakshi Devidas
Meenakshi Devidas St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Elizabeth A. Raetz
Elizabeth A. Raetz New York University
William L. Carroll
William L. Carroll New York University
Naomi J. Winick
Naomi J. Winick The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Frederick R. Appelbaum
Frederick R. Appelbaum Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Michael J. Borowitz
Michael J. Borowitz Johns Hopkins University
Nyla A. Heerema
Nyla A. Heerema The Ohio State University
Elihu H. Estey
Elihu H. Estey University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career doesn’t always mean attending traditional, on-campus programs. Many students choose flexible and affordable pathways through online degrees, especially in nursing and healthcare. For those seeking a doctoral credential, an online phd nursing program can help advance research skills and open doors to leadership positions in the profession.

Registered nurses looking to enhance their qualifications can consider rn to bsn online programs, which allow working nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree while maintaining their current jobs. Similarly, individuals from non-nursing backgrounds can pursue direct entry online msn programs for a fast-track route into advanced nursing roles without a prior nursing degree.

For applicants focused on accessibility, it’s helpful to research the easiest bsn program to get into for a smoother admission process. With so many flexible online options available, students can find a program that matches their academic goals and lifestyle, making a healthcare career more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Brent L. Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles