World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
14097
World Ranking
4930
National Ranking
36

Ariel Knafo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ariel Knafo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ariel Knafo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ariel Knafo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Developmental psychology
  • Cognition

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Developmental psychology, Social psychology, Prosocial behavior, Twin study and Empathy. His Self-concept study in the realm of Developmental psychology connects with subjects such as Positive relationship. His work in the fields of Social psychology, such as Socialization and Congruence, intersects with other areas such as Social perception, Personal identity and Identity formation.

His work carried out in the field of Prosocial behavior brings together such families of science as Social relation and Child development. In his study, Vasopressin is strongly linked to Oxytocin receptor, which falls under the umbrella field of Twin study. His Empathy research focuses on Cognition and how it relates to Social behavior and Heredity.

His most cited work include:

  • The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values (779 citations)
  • The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: Genetic and environmental contributions (347 citations)
  • Genetics of Human Social Behavior (223 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Developmental psychology, Social psychology, Prosocial behavior, Empathy and Socialization. His research integrates issues of Twin study, Heritability and Cognition in his study of Developmental psychology. He has included themes like Sibling, Language development, Social cue, Social behavior and Perspective-taking in his Cognition study.

Ariel Knafo works in the field of Social psychology, focusing on Conformity in particular. His Prosocial behavior research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Altruism and Behavioural genetics. His study on Empathic concern is often connected to Social perception as part of broader study in Empathy.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Developmental psychology (62.34%)
  • Social psychology (50.65%)
  • Prosocial behavior (22.08%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2015)?

  • Developmental psychology (62.34%)
  • Social psychology (50.65%)
  • Prosocial behavior (22.08%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ariel Knafo mainly investigates Developmental psychology, Social psychology, Prosocial behavior, Genotype and Clinical psychology. His study connects Affect and Developmental psychology. The Social psychology study which covers Twin study that intersects with Object Attachment.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Young adult, Empathy, Cognition and Childhood development. His Empathy study incorporates themes from Helping behavior, Altruism, Socialization and Social behavior. His Genotype research includes elements of Meta-analysis, Child development and Self-control.

Between 2013 and 2015, his most popular works were:

  • Parenting as a Reaction Evoked by Children’s Genotype A Meta-Analysis of Children-as-Twins Studies (98 citations)
  • Parent–Child Value Similarity Across and Within Cultures (26 citations)
  • The dopamine D4 receptor gene shows a gender-sensitive association with cognitive empathy: evidence from two independent samples. (23 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social psychology
  • Developmental psychology
  • Cognition

His primary areas of investigation include Developmental psychology, Social psychology, Genotype, Normative and Northern italy. His research in the fields of Child development overlaps with other disciplines such as Gene-environment correlation. His Social psychology study often links to related topics such as Twin study.

His Genotype research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Empathy, Social behavior and Prosocial behavior. His study on Normative is intertwined with other disciplines of science such as Homogeneous and Mainstream.

Best Publications

  • The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values

    Sonia Roccas;Lilach Sagiv;Shalom H. Schwartz;Ariel Knafo

  • The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: Genetic and environmental contributions

    Ariel Knafo;Carolyn Zahn-Waxler;Carol Van Hulle;JoAnn L. Robinson

  • Empathy as a driver of prosocial behaviour: highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species.

    Jean Decety;Inbal Ben-Ami Bartal;Florina Uzefovsky;Ariel Knafo-Noam

  • Genetics of Human Social Behavior

    Richard P. Ebstein;Richard P. Ebstein;Richard P. Ebstein;Salomon Israel;Soo Hong Chew;Soo Hong Chew;Songfa Zhong;Songfa Zhong

  • Parenting and adolescents' accuracy in perceiving parental values.

    Ariel Knafo;Shalom H. Schwartz

  • Prosocial behavior from early to middle childhood: genetic and environmental influences on stability and change.

    Ariel Knafo;Robert Plomin

  • Parental discipline and affection and children's prosocial behavior: genetic and environmental links.

    Ariel Knafo;Robert Plomin

  • The Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Contributes to Prosocial Fund Allocations in the Dictator Game and the Social Value Orientations Task

    Salomon Israel;Elad Lerer;Idan Shalev;Florina Uzefovsky

  • Concern for Others in the First Year of Life: Theory, Evidence, and Avenues for Research

    Maayan Davidov;Carolyn Zahn-Waxler;Ronit Roth-Hanania;Ariel Knafo

  • 15 Prosocial Development

    Nancy Eisenberg;Tracy L. Spinrad;Ariel Knafo-Noam

  • The contributions of oxytocin and vasopressin pathway genes to human behavior.

    Richard P. Ebstein;Ariel Knafo;David Mankuta;Soo Hong Chew

  • Value Socialization in Families of Israeli-Born and Soviet-Born Adolescents in Israel

    Ariel Knafo;Shalom H. Schwartz

  • Heritability of children's prosocial behavior and differential susceptibility to parenting by variation in the dopamine receptor D4 gene

    Ariel Knafo;Salomon Israel;Richard P. Ebstein

  • Identity Formation and Parent-Child Value Congruence in Adolescence.

    Ariel Knafo;Shalom H. Schwartz

  • Genetic and environmental effects on body mass index from infancy to the onset of adulthood: an individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts participating in the COllaborative project of Development of Anthropometrical measures in Twins (CODATwins) study

    Karri Silventoinen;Karri Silventoinen;Aline Jelenkovic;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Yoon-Mi Hur

  • Genetic and environmental influences on height from infancy to early adulthood: An individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts

    Aline Jelenkovic;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Yoon Mi Hur;Yoshie Yokoyama

  • Values and Work Environment: Mapping 32 Occupations.

    Ariel Knafo;Lilach Sagiv

  • Parenting as a Reaction Evoked by Children’s Genotype A Meta-Analysis of Children-as-Twins Studies

    Reut Avinun;Ariel Knafo

  • Gene–environment correlation in developmental psychopathology

    Ariel Knafo;Sara R. Jaffee

  • The Value of Values in Cross-Cultural Research: A Special Issue in Honor of Shalom Schwartz:

    Ariel Knafo;Sonia Roccas;Lilach Sagiv

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard P. Ebstein
Richard P. Ebstein Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Salomon Israel
Salomon Israel Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Shalom H. Schwartz
Shalom H. Schwartz Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Carolyn Zahn-Waxler
Carolyn Zahn-Waxler University of Wisconsin–Madison
JoAnn Robinson
JoAnn Robinson University of Connecticut
Soo Hyun Rhee
Soo Hyun Rhee University of Colorado Boulder
Carol A. Van Hulle
Carol A. Van Hulle University of Wisconsin–Madison
Gary Bornstein
Gary Bornstein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Lilach Sagiv
Lilach Sagiv Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of meaningful online degrees and career opportunities. Many graduates pursue roles as school counselors, social workers, and mental health professionals. Each pathway has specific educational and licensure requirements that vary by state.

For example, those interested in becoming a school counselor should understand the requirements to be a school counselor in Wyoming, which include a master’s degree in school counseling and state certification.

Social work is another popular career for psychology graduates. To enter the field in Alabama, you need to meet the Alabama minimum degree requirement for social workers, typically a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW), with additional credentials required for advanced practice. In Alaska, aspiring professionals should review the Alaska minimum degree requirement for social workers, where similar standards apply.

Likewise, if you’re considering a position in the Southwest, check the social worker education requirements in Arizona for region-specific academic and certification needs.

When exploring online degrees and career pathways in psychology, it’s essential to verify the qualifications for your state and career goals, as requirements can differ significantly.

Best Scientists Citing Ariel Knafo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles