World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
86
Citations
33193
World Ranking
1123
National Ranking
696

Jonathan Baron publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Baron sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 292 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathan Baron D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Baron sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1982 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration

Overview

Jonathan Baron is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. The research profile encompasses multiple fields, primarily Neuroscience, Psychology, and Physics and Astronomy, with notable contributions across these domains.

Their research spans a variety of subfields, including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Decision Sciences

Jonathan Baron's main topics of study include:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Nuclear physics research studies
  • Astronomical and nuclear sciences

Jonathan Baron has published research in several journals, frequently contributing to the following venues:

  • Judgment and Decision Making
  • Argumentation
  • Physical Review C
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Selected recent papers include:

  • Consequences, norms, and inaction: A critical analysis (2020), Judgment and Decision Making
  • Religion, cognitive style, and rational thinking (2020), Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Consequences, norms, and inaction: Response to Gawronski et al. (2020) (2021), Judgment and Decision Making
  • Two components of individual differences in actively open-minded thinking standards: myside bias and uncertainty aversion (2024), Thinking & Reasoning
  • Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination (2023), Argumentation

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated on at least two publications with Jonathan Baron include:

  • Geoffrey P. Goodwin
  • Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen
  • Mika Hietanen
  • D. J. Hartley
  • K. Villafana

Jonathan Baron has been recognized by prestigious organizations, having been named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1982. Additionally, they hold a fellowship with The National Academy of Public Administration.

Best Publications

  • Thinking and deciding

    Jonathan Baron

  • Omission and commission in judgment and choice

    Mark Spranca;Elisa Minsk;Jonathan Baron

  • Outcome bias in decision evaluation.

    Jonathan Baron;John C. Hershey

  • Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity

    Ilana Ritov;Jonathan Baron

  • Rationality and Intelligence

    Jonathan Baron

  • Rationality for Economists

    Daniel McFadden;Mark J. Machina;Jonathan Baron

  • Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud.

    Jonathan Baron;Carol Strawson

  • Status-Quo and Omission Biases

    Ilana Ritov;Jonathan Baron

  • Ambiguity and rationality

    Deborah Frisch;Jonathan Baron

  • Regular ArticleProtected Values

    Jonathan Baron;Mark Spranca

  • Reference Points and Omission Bias

    Jonathan Baron;Ilana Ritov

  • Omission bias, individual differences, and normality

    Jonathan Baron;Ilana Ritov

  • Ignorance of Hedonic Adaptation to Hemodialysis: A Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment

    Jason Riis;George Loewenstein;Jonathan Baron;Christopher Jepson

  • Moral heuristics. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Cass R. Sunstein;Matthew D. Adler;Christopher J. Anderson;Elizabeth Anderson

  • Phonemic stage not necessary for reading

    Jonathan Baron

  • Orthographic and Word-Specific Mechanisms in Children's Reading of Words.

    Jonathan Baron

  • An analysis of the word-superiority effect☆

    Jonathan Baron;Ian Thurston

  • Outcome Knowledge, Regret, and Omission Bias

    Ilana Ritov;Jonathan Baron

  • Psychological Strategies for Winning a Geopolitical Forecasting Tournament

    Barbara Mellers;Lyle Ungar;Jonathan Baron;Jaime Ramos

  • Judgment Misguided: Intuition and Error in Public Decision Making

    Jonathan Baron

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter A. Ubel
Peter A. Ubel Duke University
John C. Hershey
John C. Hershey University of Pennsylvania
Ilana Ritov
Ilana Ritov Hebrew University of Jerusalem
David A. Asch
David A. Asch University of Pennsylvania
Howard Kunreuther
Howard Kunreuther University of Pennsylvania
Barbara A. Mellers
Barbara A. Mellers University of Pennsylvania
Philip E. Tetlock
Philip E. Tetlock University of Pennsylvania
Joshua D. Greene
Joshua D. Greene Harvard University
George Loewenstein
George Loewenstein Carnegie Mellon University
Max H. Bazerman
Max H. Bazerman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a range of online programs and career pathways in counseling, mental health, and social services. As virtual study options expand, affordability remains a key concern for many students and professionals. Choosing the right program can help you balance financial considerations with your long-term career goals.

Across the United States, there are several affordable options for those interested in counseling and related fields. You can find affordable counseling programs in New Orleans to suit different budgets. In the Northeast, students may explore some of the cheapest counseling programs in New Jersey or consider the most affordable counseling degree programs in New York.

For those based in the Midwest, there are a variety of affordable counseling degrees in Ohio that can help set the stage for a rewarding career. Researching tuition rates, scholarship opportunities, and online flexibility is crucial to finding the best program for your unique needs and career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Baron

Trending Scientists