World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
13399
World Ranking
9662
National Ranking
110

Ilana Ritov publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilana Ritov sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ilana Ritov D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilana Ritov sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ilana Ritov is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. Their research focuses primarily within the social sciences, encompassing several related subfields including safety research, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, general decision sciences, and health.

The scientist's work spans a range of topics such as experimental behavioral economics studies, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, decision-making and behavioral economics, social and intergroup psychology, law, economics, and judicial systems, religion, spirituality, and psychology, and death anxiety and social exclusion.

Frequent collaborators of Ilana Ritov include Marina Motsenok, Marc Wyszynski, Adele Diederich, Stephen M. Garcia, and Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir, with each coauthor appearing multiple times in their publication record.

The venues where Ilana Ritov has published most frequently reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research, with multiple articles appearing in the Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) from La Trobe University, SSRN Electronic Journal, and PLoS ONE.

Selected recent papers by Ilana Ritov include:

  • Arbitrary social comparison, malicious envy, and generosity, 2020, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
  • The effect of contest participation and contest outcome on subsequent prosocial behavior, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Biases in legal decision-making: Comparing prosecutors, defense attorneys, law students, and laypersons, 2023, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
  • The effect of perceived financial vulnerability on prosocial activity, 2020, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
  • Gamble for the needy! Does identifiability enhances donation?, 2020, PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Emotion-based choice

    Barbara Mellers;Alan Schwartz;Ilana Ritov

  • Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity

    Ilana Ritov;Jonathan Baron

  • The ''Identified Victim'' Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual?

    Tehila Kogut;Ilana Ritov

  • Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options

    Barbara A. Mellers;Alan J. Schwartz;Katty Ho;Ilana Ritov

  • Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues

    Daniel Kahneman;Ilana Ritov;David Schkade;Steven J. Sherman

  • Status-Quo and Omission Biases

    Ilana Ritov;Jonathan Baron

  • Reference Points and Omission Bias

    Jonathan Baron;Ilana Ritov

  • Omission bias, individual differences, and normality

    Jonathan Baron;Ilana Ritov

  • The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations

    Tehila Kogut;Ilana Ritov

  • Predictably Incoherent Judgments

    Cass Robert Sunstein;Daniel Kahneman;David Schkade;Ilana Ritov

  • Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method.

    Daniel Kahneman;Ilana Ritov

  • Stated Willingness to Pay for Public Goods: A Psychological Perspective

    Daniel Kahneman;Ilana Ritov;Karen E. Jacowitz;Paul Grant

  • Outcome Knowledge, Regret, and Omission Bias

    Ilana Ritov;Jonathan Baron

  • Protected Values and Omission Bias.

    Ilana Ritov;Jonathan Baron

  • The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration

    Uriel Haran;Ilana Ritov;Barbara A. Mellers

  • Action bias among elite soccer goalkeepers: The case of penalty kicks

    Michael Bar-Eli;Michael Bar-Eli;Ofer H. Azar;Ilana Ritov;Yael Keidar-Levin

  • "One of us": Outstanding willingness to help save a single identified compatriot.

    Tehila Kogut;Ilana Ritov

  • Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior.

    Amos Schurr;Ilana Ritov

  • The affective costs of overconfidence

    A. Peter McGraw;Barbara A. Mellers;Ilana Ritov

  • Behavioral Law and Economics: Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity

    Ilana Ritov;Jonathan Baron

  • The Construction of Preference: Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions? An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues

    Daniel Kahneman;Ilana Ritov;David A. Schkade

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Baron
Jonathan Baron University of Pennsylvania
Daniel Kahneman
Daniel Kahneman Princeton University
Barbara A. Mellers
Barbara A. Mellers University of Pennsylvania
David A. Schkade
David A. Schkade University of California, San Diego
Michael Bar-Eli
Michael Bar-Eli Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Cass R. Sunstein
Cass R. Sunstein Harvard University
Ofer H. Azar
Ofer H. Azar Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Shaul Shalvi
Shaul Shalvi University of Amsterdam
Itamar Gati
Itamar Gati Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Joshua D. Greene
Joshua D. Greene Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Psychology in the USA opens up a range of online degree options and specialized career pathways. Commonly, students explore roles such as counseling, mental health support, or addiction recovery. Many opt for online programs, which offer flexibility and can be tailored to fit different life circumstances and learning styles.

One rapidly growing field is substance abuse counseling. The journey for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Aurora, for example, includes understanding state licensing requirements, obtaining the necessary education, and gaining field experience. Similarly, if you’re interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Atlanta or becoming a substance abuse counselor in Austin, you’ll find that programs often require coursework in addiction studies, ethics, and supervised practice.

Regional considerations play an important role. For example, the steps for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Bakersfield can differ from state to state. Be sure to research the specific educational requirements and job outlook in your chosen area. With the right online psychology degree, you’ll be well-equipped to pursue a meaningful and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Ilana Ritov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles