World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9367 8755 408 394 94 8519

Shaul Shalvi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shaul Shalvi between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shaul Shalvi published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2025. 15 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2025. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 2 publications
2006 2026

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shaul Shalvi: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 2
2008 0
2009 1
2010 4
2011 9
2012 6
2013 3
2014 12
2015 8
2016 7
2017 10
2018 8
2019 10
2020 6
2021 8
2022 9
2023 7
2024 8
2025 13
2026 2
Total 134
Download as CSV

Shaul Shalvi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaul Shalvi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 94
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Shaul Shalvi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaul Shalvi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Shaul Shalvi is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and specializes in research within the social sciences, with a focus on experimental behavioral economics. Their work spans several subfields including safety research, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and general decision sciences.

The main topics Shalvi investigates include:

  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Cultural Differences and Values

Frequent publication venues for Shalvi's research include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
  • Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Psychological Bulletin

Shalvi has collaborated repeatedly with a number of co-authors, including Ivan Soraperra, Margarita Leib, Ori Weisel, Nils Köbis, and Eugen Dimant, with multiple joint publications reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Some of Shalvi's recent papers comprise:

  • "The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework" (2020) published in the Journal of Management
  • "Requiem for a Nudge: Framing effects in nudging honesty" (2020) in the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
  • "Collaborative dishonesty: A meta-analytic review." (2021) in Psychological Bulletin
  • "Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe" (2021) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Ignorance by choice: A meta-analytic review of the underlying motives of willful ignorance and its consequences." (2023) in Psychological Bulletin

The body of Shalvi's work addresses behavioral economics from both a theoretical and applied perspective, examining moral and emotional judgments as well as decision-making processes. Their research also explores ethical behavior in business and education settings, cultural influences on social behavior, and the impacts of misinformation.

Best Publications

  • The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Regulates Parochial Altruism in Intergroup Conflict Among Humans

    Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Lindred L. Greer;Michel J. J. Handgraaf;Shaul Shalvi

  • Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism

    Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Lindred L. Greer;Gerben A. Van Kleef;Shaul Shalvi

  • Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior

    Shaul Shalvi;Jason Dana;Michel J.J. Handgraaf;Carsten K.W. De Dreu

  • Self-Serving Justifications Doing Wrong and Feeling Moral

    Shaul Shalvi;Francesca Gino;Rachel Barkan;Shahar Ayal

  • Honesty Requires Time (and Lack of Justifications)

    Shaul Shalvi;Ori Eldar;Yoella Bereby-Meyer

  • Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures

    Daniel Sznycer;John Tooby;Leda Cosmides;Roni Porat;Roni Porat

  • The collaborative roots of corruption

    Ori Weisel;Shaul Shalvi

  • Oxytocin promotes group-serving dishonesty

    Shaul Shalvi;Carsten K. W. De Dreu

  • The Herding Hormone Oxytocin Stimulates In-Group Conformity

    Mirre Stallen;Mirre Stallen;Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Shaul Shalvi;Ale Smidts

  • Ethical Manoeuvring: Why People Avoid Both Major and Minor Lies

    Shaul Shalvi;Michel J. J. Handgraaf;Carsten K.W. De Dreu

  • Being Honest About Dishonesty: Correlating Self-Reports and Actual Lying

    Rony Halevy;Shaul Shalvi;Bruno Verschuere

  • Justifications Shape Ethical Blind Spots

    Andrea Pittarello;Margarita Leib;Tom Gordon-Hecker;Shaul Shalvi

  • Psychological distance boosts value-behavior correspondence in ultimatum bargaining and integrative negotiation

    Mauro Giacomantonio;Carsten K.W. De Dreu;Shaul Shalvi;Daniel Sligte

  • Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness.

    Daniel Sznycer;Daniel Sznycer;Daniel Sznycer;Maria Florencia Lopez Seal;Aaron Sell;Julian Lim

  • Oxytocin motivates non-cooperation in intergroup conflict to protect vulnerable in-group members.

    Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Shaul Shalvi;Lindred L. Greer;Gerben A. Van Kleef

  • Requiem for a Nudge: Framing effects in nudging honesty

    Eugen Dimant;Gerben A. van Kleef;Shaul Shalvi

  • The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework:

    Nils C. Köbis;Ivan Soraperra;Shaul Shalvi

  • “I cheated, but only a little”: Partial confessions to unethical behavior.

    Eyal Peer;Alessandro Acquisti;Shaul Shalvi

  • Intuitive Honesty Versus Dishonesty: Meta-Analytic Evidence.

    Nils C Köbis;Bruno Verschuere;Yoella Bereby-Meyer;David Rand

  • Getting stuck or stepping back: effects of obstacles and construal level in the negotiation of creative solutions

    Carsten K.W. De Dreu;Mauro Giacomantonio;Shaul Shalvi;Daniel Sligte

  • Emotional justifications for unethical behaviour

    Shaul Shalvi;Jean-Louis Van Gelder;Job Van Der Schalk

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Carsten K. W. De Dreu University of Groningen
Benjamin van Rooij
Benjamin van Rooij University of Amsterdam
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam
Gerben A. van Kleef
Gerben A. van Kleef University of Amsterdam
Elizabeth Cauffman
Elizabeth Cauffman University of California, Irvine
David G. Rand
David G. Rand Cornell University
Matthijs Baas
Matthijs Baas University of Amsterdam
Albert Costa
Albert Costa Pompeu Fabra University
John Tooby
John Tooby University of California, Santa Barbara
Ilana Ritov
Ilana Ritov Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide array of online degrees and rewarding career pathways—especially in social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many graduates choose to pursue further specialization, online master's programs, or clinical licensure to expand their professional options.

For those interested in becoming licensed social workers, it’s important to understand that requirements vary by state. For example, Virginia social work license requirements detail educational prerequisites, supervised experience, and examination steps. Similarly, those aiming to practice in Washington should be aware of the specific process outlined in how to become a social worker in Washington.

If you plan to work in different regions, be sure to review guidelines like how to become a social worker in West Virginia and Wisconsin social work license requirements. These resources provide essential information about local accreditation, background checks, and state-specific exams.

Exploring online degrees or licensure in social work can help students tailor their studies to fit their goals and lifestyle. Understanding each state’s unique pathway is crucial when planning your psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Shaul Shalvi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles