World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
8519
World Ranking
9367
National Ranking
408

Shaul Shalvi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaul Shalvi sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Shaul Shalvi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaul Shalvi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shaul Shalvi is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and specializes in research within the social sciences, with a focus on experimental behavioral economics. Their work spans several subfields including safety research, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and general decision sciences.

The main topics Shalvi investigates include:

  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Cultural Differences and Values

Frequent publication venues for Shalvi's research include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
  • Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Psychological Bulletin

Shalvi has collaborated repeatedly with a number of co-authors, including Ivan Soraperra, Margarita Leib, Ori Weisel, Nils Köbis, and Eugen Dimant, with multiple joint publications reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Some of Shalvi's recent papers comprise:

  • "The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework" (2020) published in the Journal of Management
  • "Requiem for a Nudge: Framing effects in nudging honesty" (2020) in the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
  • "Collaborative dishonesty: A meta-analytic review." (2021) in Psychological Bulletin
  • "Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe" (2021) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Ignorance by choice: A meta-analytic review of the underlying motives of willful ignorance and its consequences." (2023) in Psychological Bulletin

The body of Shalvi's work addresses behavioral economics from both a theoretical and applied perspective, examining moral and emotional judgments as well as decision-making processes. Their research also explores ethical behavior in business and education settings, cultural influences on social behavior, and the impacts of misinformation.

Best Publications

  • The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Regulates Parochial Altruism in Intergroup Conflict Among Humans

    Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Lindred L. Greer;Michel J. J. Handgraaf;Shaul Shalvi

  • Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism

    Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Lindred L. Greer;Gerben A. Van Kleef;Shaul Shalvi

  • Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior

    Shaul Shalvi;Jason Dana;Michel J.J. Handgraaf;Carsten K.W. De Dreu

  • Self-Serving Justifications Doing Wrong and Feeling Moral

    Shaul Shalvi;Francesca Gino;Rachel Barkan;Shahar Ayal

  • Honesty Requires Time (and Lack of Justifications)

    Shaul Shalvi;Ori Eldar;Yoella Bereby-Meyer

  • Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures

    Daniel Sznycer;John Tooby;Leda Cosmides;Roni Porat;Roni Porat

  • The collaborative roots of corruption

    Ori Weisel;Shaul Shalvi

  • Oxytocin promotes group-serving dishonesty

    Shaul Shalvi;Carsten K. W. De Dreu

  • The Herding Hormone Oxytocin Stimulates In-Group Conformity

    Mirre Stallen;Mirre Stallen;Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Shaul Shalvi;Ale Smidts

  • Ethical Manoeuvring: Why People Avoid Both Major and Minor Lies

    Shaul Shalvi;Michel J. J. Handgraaf;Carsten K.W. De Dreu

  • Being Honest About Dishonesty: Correlating Self-Reports and Actual Lying

    Rony Halevy;Shaul Shalvi;Bruno Verschuere

  • Justifications Shape Ethical Blind Spots

    Andrea Pittarello;Margarita Leib;Tom Gordon-Hecker;Shaul Shalvi

  • Psychological distance boosts value-behavior correspondence in ultimatum bargaining and integrative negotiation

    Mauro Giacomantonio;Carsten K.W. De Dreu;Shaul Shalvi;Daniel Sligte

  • Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness.

    Daniel Sznycer;Daniel Sznycer;Daniel Sznycer;Maria Florencia Lopez Seal;Aaron Sell;Julian Lim

  • Oxytocin motivates non-cooperation in intergroup conflict to protect vulnerable in-group members.

    Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Shaul Shalvi;Lindred L. Greer;Gerben A. Van Kleef

  • Requiem for a Nudge: Framing effects in nudging honesty

    Eugen Dimant;Gerben A. van Kleef;Shaul Shalvi

  • The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework:

    Nils C. Köbis;Ivan Soraperra;Shaul Shalvi

  • “I cheated, but only a little”: Partial confessions to unethical behavior.

    Eyal Peer;Alessandro Acquisti;Shaul Shalvi

  • Intuitive Honesty Versus Dishonesty: Meta-Analytic Evidence.

    Nils C Köbis;Bruno Verschuere;Yoella Bereby-Meyer;David Rand

  • Getting stuck or stepping back: effects of obstacles and construal level in the negotiation of creative solutions

    Carsten K.W. De Dreu;Mauro Giacomantonio;Shaul Shalvi;Daniel Sligte

  • Emotional justifications for unethical behaviour

    Shaul Shalvi;Jean-Louis Van Gelder;Job Van Der Schalk

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Carsten K. W. De Dreu University of Groningen
Benjamin van Rooij
Benjamin van Rooij University of Amsterdam
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam
Gerben A. van Kleef
Gerben A. van Kleef University of Amsterdam
Elizabeth Cauffman
Elizabeth Cauffman University of California, Irvine
David G. Rand
David G. Rand Cornell University
Matthijs Baas
Matthijs Baas University of Amsterdam
Albert Costa
Albert Costa Pompeu Fabra University
John Tooby
John Tooby University of California, Santa Barbara
Ilana Ritov
Ilana Ritov Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide array of online degrees and rewarding career pathways—especially in social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many graduates choose to pursue further specialization, online master's programs, or clinical licensure to expand their professional options.

For those interested in becoming licensed social workers, it’s important to understand that requirements vary by state. For example, Virginia social work license requirements detail educational prerequisites, supervised experience, and examination steps. Similarly, those aiming to practice in Washington should be aware of the specific process outlined in how to become a social worker in Washington.

If you plan to work in different regions, be sure to review guidelines like how to become a social worker in West Virginia and Wisconsin social work license requirements. These resources provide essential information about local accreditation, background checks, and state-specific exams.

Exploring online degrees or licensure in social work can help students tailor their studies to fit their goals and lifestyle. Understanding each state’s unique pathway is crucial when planning your psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Shaul Shalvi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles