Francesca Gino mainly investigates Social psychology, Dishonesty, Feeling, Morality and Cheating. Her Social psychology study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Task. The various areas that Francesca Gino examines in her Dishonesty study include Honesty, Deception, Empathy, Equity and Helping behavior.
Her study explores the link between Feeling and topics such as Gratitude that cross with problems in Agency and Interpersonal communication. Her Morality study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Moral development, Moral disengagement, Altruism, Conscience and Motivated forgetting. Her Cheating research integrates issues from Scarcity, Realm, Flexibility and Self.
Francesca Gino focuses on Social psychology, Dishonesty, Morality, Public relations and Feeling. The study incorporates disciplines such as Perception and Negotiation in addition to Social psychology. Dishonesty and Honesty are frequently intertwined in her study.
Her Morality research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Moral psychology and Moral disengagement. Francesca Gino frequently studies issues relating to Behavioral ethics and Cheating.
Francesca Gino mainly focuses on Social psychology, Perception, Organizational culture, Public relations and Interpersonal communication. Her study in the fields of Feeling and Cheating under the domain of Social psychology overlaps with other disciplines such as Conversation. She has researched Perception in several fields, including Communication styles, Organizational studies and Self-disclosure.
Francesca Gino combines subjects such as Period and Economy with her study of Organizational culture. Her work on Employee development as part of general Public relations study is frequently connected to Ideal, Work environment, Key and Information sharing, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. Her Interpersonal communication research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Optometry, Interpersonal relationship, Advice, Impression management and Dishonesty.
Her primary areas of study are Social psychology, Perception, Feeling, Dishonesty and Interpersonal communication. Her Social psychology research incorporates elements of Belief perseverance and Negotiation. Her research integrates issues of Competition, Presentational and representational acting, Face, Spite and Self in her study of Perception.
Her Feeling research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Impression formation and Persuasion. Her research in Dishonesty intersects with topics in Engineering ethics and Morality. Her Interpersonal communication research incorporates themes from Empathy, Deception, Impression management and Social perception.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Contagion and Differentiation in Unethical Behavior The Effect of One Bad Apple on the Barrel
Francesca Gino;Shahar Ayal;Dan Ariely.
Psychological Science (2009)
Is yours a learning organization
David A. Garvin;Amy C. Edmondson;Francesca Gino.
Unable to Resist Temptation: How Self-control Depletion Promotes Unethical Behavior
Francesca Gino;Maurice E. Schweitzer;Nicole L. Mead;Dan Ariely.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2011)
A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior.
Adam M. Grant;Francesca Gino.
The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest.
Francesca Gino;Dan Ariely.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2012)
Too Tired to Tell the Truth: Self-Control Resource Depletion and Dishonesty
N.L. Mead;R.F. Baumeister;F. Gino;M.E. Schweitzer.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2009)
Dishonest Deed, Clear Conscience: When Cheating Leads to Moral Disengagement and Motivated Forgetting
Lisa L. Shu;Francesca Gino;Max H. Bazerman.
Toward a Theory of Behavioral Operations
Francesca Gino;Gary P. Pisano.
Reversing the Extraverted Leadership Advantage: The Role of Employee Proactivity
Adam M. Grant;Francesca Gino;David A. Hofmann.
Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end
Lisa L. Shu;Nina Mazar;Francesca Gino;Dan Ariely.
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below: