World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
88
Citations
32279
World Ranking
1026
National Ranking
640

Francesca Gino publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesca Gino sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 292 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Francesca Gino D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesca Gino sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Francesca Gino is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a specialization in social psychology, sociology and political science, applied psychology, information systems and management, and cognitive neuroscience. The scope of their work extensively covers topics related to social and intergroup psychology, death anxiety and social exclusion, behavioral health and interventions, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, and ethics in business and education.

Among their notable recent publications are:

  • Conversational receptiveness: Improving engagement with opposing views (2020), published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • I Own, So I Help Out: How Psychological Ownership Increases Prosocial Behavior (2020), published in Journal of Consumer Research
  • Signing at the beginning versus at the end does not decrease dishonesty (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Task Selection and Workload: A Focus on Completing Easy Tasks Hurts Performance (2020), published in Management Science
  • Between Home and Work: Commuting as an Opportunity for Role Transitions (2020), published in Organization Science

Francesca Gino frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most common co-authors include Maryam Kouchaki, Julia Lee, Bradley R. Staats, Juliana Schroeder, and Michael I. Norton. These professional partnerships reflect ongoing engagement in interdisciplinary research within their fields of study.

Their scholarly output appears regularly in several publication venues, with multiple contributions to the Academy of Management Proceedings, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, UNC Libraries, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, and Psychological Science.

Best Publications

  • Contagion and Differentiation in Unethical Behavior The Effect of One Bad Apple on the Barrel

    Francesca Gino;Shahar Ayal;Dan Ariely

  • A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior.

    Adam M. Grant;Francesca Gino

  • Is yours a learning organization

    David A. Garvin;Amy C. Edmondson;Francesca Gino

  • Unable to Resist Temptation: How Self-control Depletion Promotes Unethical Behavior

    Francesca Gino;Maurice E. Schweitzer;Nicole L. Mead;Dan Ariely

  • The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest.

    Francesca Gino;Dan Ariely

  • Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty

    N.L. Mead;R.F. Baumeister;F. Gino;M.E. Schweitzer

  • Dishonest Deed, Clear Conscience: When Cheating Leads to Moral Disengagement and Motivated Forgetting

    Lisa L. Shu;Francesca Gino;Max H. Bazerman

  • Toward a Theory of Behavioral Operations

    Francesca Gino;Gary P. Pisano

  • Reversing the Extraverted Leadership Advantage: The Role of Employee Proactivity

    Adam M. Grant;Francesca Gino;David A. Hofmann

  • Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end

    Lisa L. Shu;Nina Mazar;Francesca Gino;Dan Ariely

  • Self-Serving Justifications Doing Wrong and Feeling Moral

    Shaul Shalvi;Francesca Gino;Rachel Barkan;Shahar Ayal

  • Breaking Them in or Eliciting Their Best? Reframing Socialization around Newcomers’ Authentic Self-expression

    Daniel M. Cable;Francesca Gino;Bradley R. Staats

  • Good lamps are the best police: darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior

    Chen-Bo Zhong;Vanessa K. Bohns;Francesca Gino

  • DYNAMICALLY INTEGRATING KNOWLEDGE IN TEAMS: TRANSFORMING RESOURCES INTO PERFORMANCE

    Heidi K. Gardner;Francesca Gino;Bradley R. Staats

  • Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration

    Ella Miron-Spektor;Francesca Gino;Linda Argote

  • The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth

    Francesca Gino;Lamar Pierce

  • Self-Serving Altruism? The Lure of Unethical Actions that Benefit Others

    Francesca Gino;Shahar Ayal;Dan Ariely

  • The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity.

    Silvia Bellezza;Francesca Gino;Anat Keinan

  • Vicarious Dishonesty: When Psychological Closeness Creates Distance from One's Moral Compass

    Francesca Gino;Adam D. Galinsky

  • The psychological costs of pay‐for‐performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees

    Ian Larkin;Lamar Pierce;Francesca Gino

  • "Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity:" Erratum.

    Adam M. Grant;Francesca Gino;David A. Hofmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael I. Norton
Michael I. Norton Harvard University
Max H. Bazerman
Max H. Bazerman Harvard University
Dan Ariely
Dan Ariely Duke University
Gary P. Pisano
Gary P. Pisano Harvard University
Maurice E. Schweitzer
Maurice E. Schweitzer University of Pennsylvania
Paul J. Green
Paul J. Green Harvard University
Adam D. Galinsky
Adam D. Galinsky Columbia University
Don A. Moore
Don A. Moore University of California, Berkeley
Daniel M. Cable
Daniel M. Cable London Business School
Adam M. Grant
Adam M. Grant University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in psychology grows, many students are seeking flexible, affordable options to earn their degree. Online psychology programs allow learners to balance education, work, and personal commitments. These programs can also help students save money, especially by choosing universities known for low tuition rates in their region.

Those considering online study should explore resources that highlight affordable psychology degrees in New York or affordable psychology degrees in Ohio. For students in the Midwest and South, there are also excellent affordable psychology programs in Oklahoma.

For those focused on urban centers, it's worth comparing the cheapest psychology degrees in Oklahoma City. With accessible online pathways, graduates can pursue careers in mental health, research, education, or even enter graduate school. Comparing regional and online options ensures the best academic experience and return on investment.

Best Scientists Citing Francesca Gino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles