What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Social psychology
- Management
- Social science
Francesca Gino mainly investigates Social psychology, Dishonesty, Feeling, Morality and Cheating.
Her Social psychology study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Task.
The various areas that Francesca Gino examines in her Dishonesty study include Honesty, Deception, Empathy, Equity and Helping behavior.
Her study explores the link between Feeling and topics such as Gratitude that cross with problems in Agency and Interpersonal communication.
Her Morality study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Moral development, Moral disengagement, Altruism, Conscience and Motivated forgetting.
Her Cheating research integrates issues from Scarcity, Realm, Flexibility and Self.
Her most cited work include:
- Is yours a learning organization (606 citations)
- Contagion and Differentiation in Unethical Behavior The Effect of One Bad Apple on the Barrel (563 citations)
- Unable to Resist Temptation: How Self-control Depletion Promotes Unethical Behavior (423 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Francesca Gino focuses on Social psychology, Dishonesty, Morality, Public relations and Feeling.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Perception and Negotiation in addition to Social psychology.
Dishonesty and Honesty are frequently intertwined in her study.
Her Morality research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Moral psychology and Moral disengagement.
Francesca Gino frequently studies issues relating to Behavioral ethics and Cheating.
She most often published in these fields:
- Social psychology (53.93%)
- Dishonesty (12.36%)
- Morality (11.52%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Social psychology (53.93%)
- Perception (6.74%)
- Organizational culture (3.37%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Francesca Gino mainly focuses on Social psychology, Perception, Organizational culture, Public relations and Interpersonal communication.
Her study in the fields of Feeling and Cheating under the domain of Social psychology overlaps with other disciplines such as Conversation.
She has researched Perception in several fields, including Communication styles, Organizational studies and Self-disclosure.
Francesca Gino combines subjects such as Period and Economy with her study of Organizational culture.
Her work on Employee development as part of general Public relations study is frequently connected to Ideal, Work environment, Key and Information sharing, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
Her Interpersonal communication research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Optometry, Interpersonal relationship, Advice, Impression management and Dishonesty.
Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- Effect of Different Financial Incentive Structures on Promoting Physical Activity Among Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial (48 citations)
- Seeker beware: The interpersonal costs of ignoring advice (10 citations)
- Handshaking promotes deal-making by signaling cooperative intent. (10 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Social psychology
- Management
- Social science
Her primary areas of study are Social psychology, Perception, Feeling, Dishonesty and Interpersonal communication.
Her Social psychology research incorporates elements of Belief perseverance and Negotiation.
Her research integrates issues of Competition, Presentational and representational acting, Face, Spite and Self in her study of Perception.
Her Feeling research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Impression formation and Persuasion.
Her research in Dishonesty intersects with topics in Engineering ethics and Morality.
Her Interpersonal communication research incorporates themes from Empathy, Deception, Impression management and Social perception.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
