World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
32913
World Ranking
11262
National Ranking
5781

William J. Jusko publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Jusko sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 661 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William J. Jusko D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Jusko sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1985 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

William J. Jusko is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Neurology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies

William J. Jusko has published extensively in several frequent venues, reflecting the diversity and depth of their research. These venues include:

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
  • Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
  • The AAPS Journal

The scientist has collaborated regularly with a group of frequent coauthors, indicating ongoing research partnerships. These include:

  • Yoo-Seong Jeong
  • Xiao-Nan Li
  • Debra C. DuBois
  • Richard R. Almon
  • Ruihong Yu

Recent papers authored by William J. Jusko cover diverse aspects of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Among these are:

  • "Transitioning from Basic toward Systems Pharmacodynamic Models: Lessons from Corticosteroids," 2020, published in Pharmacological Reviews
  • "Meta-Assessment of Metformin Absorption and Disposition Pharmacokinetics in Nine Species," 2021, published in Pharmaceuticals
  • "Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics of Dexamethasone in Rats," 2020, published in Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • "Population pharmacokinetic modeling of intramuscular and oral dexamethasone and betamethasone in Indian women," 2021, published in Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
  • "Assessing Liver-to-Plasma Partition Coefficients and In Silico Calculation Methods: When Does the Hepatic Model Matter in PBPK?," 2022, published in Drug Metabolism and Disposition

In 1985, William J. Jusko was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), reflecting their standing within the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses

    Natalie L. Dayneka;Natalie L. Dayneka;Varun Garg;William J. Jusko

  • General pharmacokinetic model for drugs exhibiting target-mediated drug disposition.

    Donald E. Mager;William J. Jusko

  • Plasma and Tissue Protein Binding of Drugs in Pharmacokinetics

    William J. Jusko;Mark Gretch

  • Applied pharmacokinetics : principles of therapeutic drug monitoring

    William E. Evans;Jerome J. Schentag;William J. Jusko

  • Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects

    William J Jusko;Hui C Ko

  • Diversity of Mechanism-Based Pharmacodynamic Models

    Donald E. Mager;Elzbieta Wyska;William J. Jusko

  • Consensus document: therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus (FK-506).

    William J. Jusko;Angus W. Thomson;John Fung;Paul McMaster

  • Factors affecting theophylline clearances: Age, tobacco, marijuana, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, obesity, oral contraceptives, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and ethanol

    William J. Jusko;Mark J. Gardner;Antoinette Mangione;Jerome J. Schentag

  • Effect of smoking on theophylline disposition.

    Susan N. Hunt;William J. Jusko;Anthony M. Yurchak

  • Introduction of a Composite Parameter to the Pharmacokinetics of Venlafaxine and its Active O‐Desmethyl Metabolite

    Karen J. Klamerus;Kathleen Moloney;Richard L. Rudolph;Samuel F. Sisenwine

  • Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients.

    William J. Jusko;Wojciech Piekoszewski;Goran B. Klintmalm;Mark S. Shaefer

  • Dose dependent pharmacokinetics of prednisone and prednisolone in man

    James Q. Rose;Anthony M. Yurchak;William J. Jusko

  • Characteristics of indirect pharmacodynamic models and applications to clinical drug responses.

    Amarnath Sharma;Amarnath Sharma;William J. Jusko

  • Gender‐based effects on methylprednisolone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

    Kim H Lew;Kim H Lew;Elizabeth A Ludwig;Elizabeth A Ludwig;Mark A Milad;Mark A Milad;Kathleen Donovan;Kathleen Donovan

  • Transit Compartments versus Gamma Distribution Function To Model Signal Transduction Processes in Pharmacodynamics

    Yu-Nien Sun;William J. Jusko

  • Factors affecting the absorption of riboflavin in man.

    Gerhard Levy;William J. Jusko

  • Corticosteroid analysis in biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography

    James Q. Rose;William J. Jusko

  • Enhanced biotransformation of theophylline in marihuana and tobacco smokers

    William J. Jusko;Jerome J. Schentag;John H. Clark;Mark Gardner

  • Fluid Shifts and Other Factors Affecting Plasma Protein Binding of Prednisolone by Equilibrium Dialysis

    F. Douglas Boudinot;William J. Jusko

  • Role of tobacco smoking in pharmacokinetics

    William J. Jusko

Frequent Co-Authors

Stanley J. Szefler
Stanley J. Szefler University of Colorado Denver
Jerome J. Schentag
Jerome J. Schentag University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Gerhard Levy
Gerhard Levy University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Eric P. Hoffman
Eric P. Hoffman Binghamton University
Giovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava University at Buffalo, State University of New York
David M. Janicke
David M. Janicke University of Florida
Sheldon L. Spector
Sheldon L. Spector University of California, Los Angeles
Brian T. Tsuji
Brian T. Tsuji University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Elizabeth A. Repasky
Elizabeth A. Repasky Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Frank Z. Stanczyk
Frank Z. Stanczyk University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare careers or enhancing your qualifications can be a smart move for students interested in Medicine. Many professionals begin with nursing degrees, which offer multiple entry points and online study options. If affordability is a top concern, you can review some of the cheapest bsn programs online to start your nursing journey cost-effectively.

Registered Nurses (RNs) seeking career advancement may consider options such as the cheapest rn to bsn program to obtain a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. For those who aspire to reach the highest levels in nursing, the cheapest phd nursing programs offer a pathway to academic and research leadership with minimized financial burden.

Additionally, individuals who hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree but wish to transition into the nursing field can consider direct entry msn programs. These accelerated programs allow students to quickly earn a Master of Science in Nursing and open doors to advanced practice roles. Exploring these diverse online degree options provides flexibility and varied career pathways within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Jusko

Trending Scientists