World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Meindert Danhof

Meindert Danhof

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
23210
World Ranking
16193
National Ranking
612

Meindert Danhof publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meindert Danhof sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 594 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Meindert Danhof D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meindert Danhof sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Meindert Danhof is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands and has contributed to the field of medicine, particularly in genetics, pharmacology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and clinical biochemistry. Their research spans several interconnected topics including myeloproliferative neoplasms, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment, tuberculosis research and epidemiology, drug-induced adverse reactions, antibiotics pharmacokinetics and efficacy, and metabolism and genetic disorders.

Recent publications by Meindert Danhof include:

  • In memoriam Lambertus ("Bert") A. Peletier 29 March 1937-16 December 2023: Furthering quantitative pharmacology through applied mathematics, 2024, CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology

Meindert Danhof has collaborated with co-authors such as:

  • Martin Marinov
  • Diego González
  • Sajid Melvin George
  • Asma Ahmed
  • S. Keeney

Their work has been published in various journals, including:

  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Pharmaceutical Research
  • Transplantation

Meindert Danhof's contributions to medicine focus on the following fields of study:

  • Genetics
  • Pharmacology
  • Epidemiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Biochemistry

Main research topics covered include:

  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment
  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders

Best Publications

  • Buprenorphine induces ceiling in respiratory depression but not in analgesia

    A. Dahan;A. Yassen;R. Romberg;E. Sarton

  • Comparison of the respiratory effects of intravenous buprenorphine and fentanyl in humans and rats

    A Dahan;A Yassen;H Bijl;R Romberg

  • Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling in translational drug research.

    Meindert Danhof;Elizabeth C.M. de Lange;Oscar E. Della Pasqua;Bart A. Ploeger

  • Considerations in the use of cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics to predict brain target concentrations in the clinical setting: implications of the barriers between blood and brain.

    Elizabeth C.M. de Lange;Meindert Danhof

  • Therapeutic drug monitoring in saliva.

    M. Danhof;D. D. Breimer

  • Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling: Biophase Distribution, Receptor Theory, and Dynamical Systems Analysis

    Meindert Danhof;Joost de Jongh;Elizabeth C M De Lange;Oscar Della Pasqua

  • Methodological considerations of intracerebral microdialysis in pharmacokinetic studies on drug transport across the blood–brain barrier

    de Lange Ec;Danhof M;de Boer Ag;Breimer Dd

  • The role of population PK–PD modelling in paediatric clinical research

    Roosmarijn F. W. De Cock;Chiara Piana;Elke H. J. Krekels;Elke H. J. Krekels;Meindert Danhof

  • Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the central nervous system effects of midazolam and its main metabolite α-hydroxymidazolam in healthy volunteers

    Jaap W Mandona;Bert Tuk;Alfred L van Steveninck;Douwe D Breimer

  • Markers of disease severity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Luigi G. Franciosi;Clive P. Page;Bartolome R. Celli;Mario Cazzola

  • Extensions to the Visual Predictive Check to facilitate model performance evaluation

    Teun M. Post;Jan I. Freijer;Bart A. Ploeger;Meindert Danhof

  • Rate of increase in the plasma concentration of nifedipine as a major determinant of its hemodynamic effects in humans

    C H Kleinbloesem;C H Kleinbloesem;P Van Brummelen;P Van Brummelen;M Danhof;M Danhof;H Faber;H Faber

  • Variability in nifedipine pharmacokinetics and dynamics: A new oxidation polymorphism in man

    C.H. Kleinbloesem;P. van Brummelen;H. Faber;M. Danhof

  • Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Modeling—A New Classification of Biomarkers

    Meindert Danhof;Gunnar Alvan;Svein G. Dahl;Jochen Kuhlmann

  • Electroencephalogram Effect Measures and Relationships Between Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Centrally Acting Drugs

    Jaap W. Mandema;Meindert Danhof

  • Clinical pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone

    D. A. Eckland;M. Danhof

  • Assay of antipyrine and its primary metabolites in plasma, saliva and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography and some preliminary results in man.

    M. Danhof;E. de Groot-van der Vis;D.D. Breimer

  • Explaining variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics to optimize early exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients.

    Rogier R Press;Bart A Ploeger;Jan den Hartigh;Tahar van der Straaten

  • Characterization of an "in vitro" blood-brain barrier: effects of molecular size and lipophilicity on cerebrovascular endothelial transport rates of drugs.

    J. B. M. M. Van Bree;A. G. De Boer;M. Danhof;L. A. Ginsel

  • A Mechanism-based Disease Progression Model for Comparison of Long-term Effects of Pioglitazone, Metformin and Gliclazide on Disease Processes Underlying Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

    Willem de Winter;Joost DeJongh;Teun Post;Bart Ploeger

Frequent Co-Authors

Douwe D. Breimer
Douwe D. Breimer Leiden University
Dick Tibboel
Dick Tibboel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Adriaan P. IJzerman
Adriaan P. IJzerman Leiden University
Joke A. Bouwstra
Joke A. Bouwstra Leiden University
Albert Dahan
Albert Dahan Leiden University Medical Center
Lambertus A. Peletier
Lambertus A. Peletier Leiden University
Geny M. M. Groothuis
Geny M. M. Groothuis University of Groningen
Johan W. Mouton
Johan W. Mouton Radboud University Medical Center
Menno R. Kruk
Menno R. Kruk Leiden University
Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Amin Rostami-Hodjegan University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond becoming a doctor, there are flexible alternatives available online. Nursing remains one of the fastest-growing fields, with numerous online programs designed to fit diverse needs and schedules. Many students begin by exploring the cheapest online bsn programs to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing at an affordable rate.

For licensed Registered Nurses aiming to advance their skills, cheapest rn to bsn online programs offer an efficient path for career and salary growth. Those pursuing advanced practice roles often look to the cheapest online np programs, which prepare graduates for Nurse Practitioner certification while managing costs.

Ambitious professionals seeking to move into leadership or academic positions may also consider doctoral programs. The availability of phd in nursing online programs makes it possible to balance doctoral studies with work or personal commitments.

Exploring these online pathways can open up many rewarding opportunities for those passionate about healthcare but looking for different routes into the field.

Best Scientists Citing Meindert Danhof

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles