World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
18802
World Ranking
9304
National Ranking
101

Avraham N. Kluger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avraham N. Kluger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Avraham N. Kluger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avraham N. Kluger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Avraham N. Kluger is a researcher affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. Their work primarily falls within the field of psychology, with a specific focus on social psychology, organizational behavior, and human resource management. Kluger's research explores complex dynamics in workplace communication, attachment, and relationship processes.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of listening and communication in work environments, as reflected in several recent publications. Notable papers include:

  • The Power of Listening at Work, 2021, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Dyadic Listening in Teams: Social Relations Model, 2020, Applied Psychology
  • A Meta-analytic Systematic Review and Theory of the Effects of Perceived Listening on Work Outcomes, 2023, Journal of Business and Psychology

Kluger's research intersects with leadership and psychological safety, as seen in the co-authored 2023 paper "Gaining feedback acceptance: Leader-member attachment style and psychological safety," published in Human Resource Management Review. Another related study titled "Relationship-specific (dyadic) humility: How your humility predicts my psychological safety and performance" (Journal of Applied Psychology, 2022) features collaboration with frequent coauthors.

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Michal Lehmann
  • Thomas E. Malloy
  • Guy Itzchakov
  • Sarit Pery
  • Limor Borut

Kluger's work appears in various scholarly venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • International Journal of Listening
  • Human Resource Management Review
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Main fields of study for Kluger are:

  • Psychology

Subfields of research encompass:

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Their main research topics focus on:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Media Influence and Health

Best Publications

  • The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.

    Avraham N. Kluger;Angelo DeNisi

  • Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations.

    Timothy A. Judge;Edwin A. Locke;Cathy C. Durham;Avraham N. Kluger

  • Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?

    Angelo S. DeNisi;Avraham N. Kluger

  • Feedback Interventions: Toward the Understanding of a Double-Edged Sword

    Avraham N. Kluger;Angelo DeNisi

  • Feedback Sign Effect on Motivation: Is it Moderated by Regulatory Focus?

    Dina Van-Dijk;Avraham N. Kluger

  • Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective

    Dina Van Dijk;Avraham N. Kluger

  • Commuting Stress: Causes, Effects, and Methods of Coping

    Meni Koslowsky;Avraham N. Kluger;Mordechai Reich

  • A meta-analysis of the association between DRD4 polymorphism and novelty seeking.

    A N Kluger;Z Siegfried;R P Ebstein

  • Strength-based performance appraisal and goal setting.

    Osnat Bouskila-Yam;Avraham N. Kluger

  • The influence of selection test type on applicant reactions to employment testing

    Avraham N. Kluger;Hannah R. Rothstein

  • The feedforward interview

    Avraham N. Kluger;Dina Nir

  • Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.

    Unknown

  • Sabbatical Leave: Who Gains and How Much?

    Oranit B. Davidson;Dov Eden;Mina Westman;Yochi Cohen-Charash

  • Commute variability and strain

    Avraham N. Kluger

  • Research Notes: The Antecedents and Consequences of Union Commitment: A Meta-Analysis

    Peter A. Bamberger;Avraham N. Kluger;Ronena Suchard

  • Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative

    Avraham N Kluger;Dina Van Dijk

  • The Antecedents and Consequences of Union Commitment: A Meta-Analysis

    Peter Bamberger;Avraham Kluger

  • The error of accepting the "theoretical" null hypothesis: the rise, fall, and resurrection of commonsense hypotheses in psychology.

    Avraham N. Kluger;Jonathan Tikochinsky

  • The Influence of Feedback on Mood: Linear Effects on Pleasantness and Curvilinear Effects on Arousal

    Avraham N. Kluger;Shai Lewinsohn;John R. Aiello

  • The Power of Listening at Work

    Avraham N. Kluger;Guy Itzchakov

  • Faking Biodata Tests Are Option-Keyed Instruments More Resistant?

    Avraham N. Kluger;Richard R. Reilly;Craig J. Russell

  • BEYOND THE MEAN BIAS: THE EFFECT OF WARNING AGAINST FAKING ON BIODATA ITEM VARIANCES

    Avraham N. Kluger;Adrienne Colella

Frequent Co-Authors

Meni Koslowsky
Meni Koslowsky Ariel University
Angelo S. DeNisi
Angelo S. DeNisi Tulane University
Richard P. Ebstein
Richard P. Ebstein Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Peter Bamberger
Peter Bamberger Tel Aviv University
Edwin A. Locke
Edwin A. Locke University of Maryland, College Park
Yoav Ganzach
Yoav Ganzach Tel Aviv University
Timothy A. Judge
Timothy A. Judge The Ohio State University
Michael P. O'Driscoll
Michael P. O'Driscoll University of Waikato
Leslie B. Hammer
Leslie B. Hammer Oregon Health & Science University
James Campbell Quick
James Campbell Quick The University of Texas at Arlington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a variety of career pathways, including counseling, social work, and mental health services. Many students are drawn to flexible and affordable options that allow them to balance work and study commitments. When considering your options, it’s vital to compare program costs and available specializations.

If you are interested in cost-effective routes to licensure, resources like the cheapest counseling degrees in Arizona provide helpful guidance on program affordability. For those in specific regions, the cheapest counseling programs in Berkeley and the most affordable counseling degree programs in Boston showcase budget-friendly options tailored to local needs.

Students interested in studying on the West Coast can consult the cheapest counseling degrees in California to find state-wide comparisons. By leveraging such resources, you can make informed decisions about your educational investment and chosen career pathway in psychology or related counseling fields.

Best Scientists Citing Avraham N. Kluger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles