World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 87 13598 12796 6909 6390 341 29090

Jerome J. Schentag publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jerome J. Schentag between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jerome J. Schentag published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 1984. 3 of the 357 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 1984. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 6 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 10 publications 1981: 12 publications 1982: 10 publications 1983: 12 publications 1984: 18 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 8 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1976 2025

357 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jerome J. Schentag: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 6
1978 6
1979 7
1980 10
1981 12
1982 10
1983 12
1984 18
1985 8
1986 3
1987 8
1988 7
1989 14
1990 5
1991 12
1992 13
1993 13
1994 11
1995 12
1996 5
1997 11
1998 10
1999 16
2000 16
2001 7
2002 7
2003 9
2004 7
2005 4
2006 5
2007 10
2008 8
2009 7
2010 4
2011 5
2012 7
2013 1
2014 8
2015 1
2016 2
2017 6
2018 2
2019 1
2020 3
2021 1
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0
2025 3
Total 357
Download as CSV

Jerome J. Schentag publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jerome J. Schentag sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 341 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 341
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jerome J. Schentag D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jerome J. Schentag sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 87
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jerome J. Schentag is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to Oncology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their published work focuses on several main topics, including cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, CAR-T cell therapy research, brain metastases and treatment, ion channel regulation and function, pain mechanisms and treatments, cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, and melanoma and MAPK pathways.

Jerome J. Schentag has contributed to various scientific publications across multiple venues. These venues include:

  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Journal of Pain Research
  • Clinical Pharmacology Advances and Applications
  • European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology
  • Diabetes

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jerome J. Schentag include:

  • Igor Puzanov
  • Poornima Subramanian
  • Yan Yatsynovich
  • David M. Jacobs
  • Maya R. Chilbert

The scientist's recent papers reflect a focus on immunotherapy, pain research, cardiac conditions, and novel drug delivery systems. Selected recent publications are:

  • Clinical characteristics, time course, treatment and outcomes of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis, 2021, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • A Review of the Therapeutic Targeting of SCN9A and Nav1.7 for Pain Relief in Current Human Clinical Trials, 2023, Journal of Pain Research
  • Neural Net Modeling of Checkpoint Inhibitor Related Myocarditis and Steroid Response, 2022, Clinical Pharmacology Advances and Applications
  • Development of the cholestosome, a novel delivery system made exclusively from cholesteryl esters, 2023, European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology
  • 1013-P: Modification of Inflammatory and Alzheimer Markers with Intracellular Delivery of Insulin Using Cholestosomes, 2020, Diabetes

Best Publications

  • Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.

    A Forrest;D E Nix;C H Ballow;T F Goss

  • Relationship of MIC and Bactericidal Activity to Efficacy of Vancomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

    George Sakoulas;Pamela A. Moise-Broder;Jerome Schentag;Alan Forrest

  • A Controlled Clinical Trial of E5 Murine Monoclonal IgM Antibody to Endotoxin in the Treatment of Gram-Negative Sepsis

    R L Greenman;R M Schein;M A Martin;R P Wenzel

  • Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions

    Jason A Roberts;Jason A Roberts;Mohd H Abdul-Aziz;Jeffrey Lipman;Jeffrey Lipman;Johan W Mouton

  • Pharmacodynamics of Vancomycin and Other Antimicrobials in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

    Pamela A. Moise-Broder;Alan Forrest;Mary C. Birmingham;Jerome J. Schentag

  • Telemetry capsule and process

    Jerome J. Schentag;David T. D'andrea

  • Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Factors Associated with the Development of Bacterial Resistance in Acutely Ill Patients during Therapy

    Jennifer K. Thomas;Alan Forrest;Sujata M. Bhavnani;Judith M. Hyatt

  • Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe Pneumonia Study Group.

    Mitchell P. Fink;David R. Snydman;Michael S. Niederman;Kenneth V. Leeper Jr.

  • Evaluation of area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC) and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) as predictors of outcome for cefepime and ceftazidime in serious bacterial infections

    Peggy S. McKinnon;Joseph A. Paladino;Jerome J. Schentag

  • Linezolid for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant, Gram-Positive Infections: Experience from a Compassionate-Use Program

    Mary C. Birmingham;Craig R. Rayner;Alison K. Meagher;Susan M. Flavin

  • Applied pharmacokinetics : principles of therapeutic drug monitoring

    William E. Evans;Jerome J. Schentag;William J. Jusko

  • The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents.

    Judith M. Hyatt;Peggy S. McKinnon;Gabrial S. Zimmer;Jerome J. Schentag

  • Opportunities for Integration of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Toxicokinetics in Rational Drug Development

    Carl C. Peck;William H. Barr;Leslie Z. Benet;Jerry Collins

  • Accessory Gene Regulator Group II Polymorphism in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Is Predictive of Failure of Vancomycin Therapy

    Pamela A. Moise-Broder;George Sakoulas;George M. Eliopoulos;Jerome J. Schentag

  • The burden of Staphylococcus aureus infections on hospitals in the United States: an analysis of the 2000 and 2001 Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.

    Gary A. Noskin;Robert J. Rubin;Jerome J. Schentag;Jan Kluytmans

  • Sampling capsule and process

    David T. D'Andrea;Jerome J. Schentag

  • Clinical Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid in Seriously Ill Patients Treated in a Compassionate Use Programme

    Craig R Rayner;Alan Forrest;Alison K Meagher;Mary C Birmingham

  • Interpretation of antibiotic concentration ratios measured in epithelial lining fluid

    Sungmin Kiem;Jerome J. Schentag

  • Vancomycin in vitro bactericidal activity and its relationship to efficacy in clearance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

    Pamela A. Moise;George Sakoulas;Alan Forrest;Jerome J. Schentag

  • Factors affecting theophylline clearances: Age, tobacco, marijuana, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, obesity, oral contraceptives, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and ethanol

    William J. Jusko;Mark J. Gardner;Antoinette Mangione;Jerome J. Schentag

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Forrest
Alan Forrest University at Buffalo, State University of New York
William J. Jusko
William J. Jusko University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Frank V. Bright
Frank V. Bright University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Jan Kluytmans
Jan Kluytmans Utrecht University
Gerhard Levy
Gerhard Levy University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Leslie Z. Benet
Leslie Z. Benet University of California, San Francisco
Sujata M. Bhavnani
Sujata M. Bhavnani University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Donald R. Stanski
Donald R. Stanski Stanford University School of Medicine
Jerry M. Collins
Jerry M. Collins National Institutes of Health
James Williams
James Williams Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary career pathways in healthcare can broaden your opportunities if you’re considering or currently studying Medicine in the USA. Many fields offer accessible online programs that cater to students seeking flexibility or career advancement.

For those interested in administrative and technical roles, best online medical billing and coding schools provide training in processing healthcare records—an essential skill in today’s medical landscape. If you’re motivated by patient care but looking for a fast track, some absn programs that don't require teas allow aspiring nurses to begin their careers without specific standardized testing barriers.

Leadership-oriented students may prefer online health administration programs, which help you step into managerial positions within healthcare settings. Similarly, nurses holding an associate degree can further their scope of practice with asn to fnp programs—accelerated bridges that lead to advanced clinical roles.

These online study options can enrich your medical education journey, help you diversify skill sets, and open new career pathways beyond the traditional MD.

Best Scientists Citing Jerome J. Schentag

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles