World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
6436
World Ranking
11560
National Ranking
4750

Derek Bradley publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek Bradley sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Derek Bradley D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek Bradley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Derek Bradley is affiliated with Walt Disney in the United States and has contributed broadly to the fields of computer science and engineering, focusing specifically on computer vision, pattern recognition, and computational mechanics. Their research encompasses various subfields including control and systems engineering, human-computer interaction, and computer graphics and computer-aided design.

The scientist's work concentrates on key topics such as face recognition and analysis, 3D shape modeling and analysis, human motion and animation, generative adversarial networks and image synthesis, computer graphics and visualization techniques, advanced vision and imaging, and gaze tracking and assistive technology.

Among the recent publications authored or coauthored by Derek Bradley are:

  • "Single-shot high-quality facial geometry and skin appearance capture," 2020, ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "Accurate Real-time 3D Gaze Tracking Using a Lightweight Eyeball Calibration," 2020, Computer Graphics Forum
  • "Local anatomically-constrained facial performance retargeting," 2022, ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "ETH-XGaze: A Large Scale Dataset for Gaze Estimation under Extreme Head Pose and Gaze Variation," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Rendering with style," 2021, ACM Transactions on Graphics

Frequent collaborators throughout their career have included:

  • Gaspard Zoss
  • Prashanth Chandran
  • Markus Groß
  • Paulo Gotardo
  • Thabo Beeler

Derek Bradley has published extensively in several key venues, prominently including:

  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • Computers & Graphics

The breadth of their research showcases a strong interdisciplinary approach combining engineering principles and computational techniques to advance understanding and technology in facial analysis, 3D modeling, and visual computing. This work is situated within both foundational computer science contexts and applied engineering frameworks.

Best Publications

  • Adaptive Thresholding using the Integral Image

    Derek Bradley;Gerhard Roth

  • High-quality passive facial performance capture using anchor frames

    Thabo Beeler;Fabian Hahn;Derek Bradley;Bernd Bickel

  • High resolution passive facial performance capture

    Derek Bradley;Wolfgang Heidrich;Tiberiu Popa;Alla Sheffer

  • State of the Art on Monocular 3D Face Reconstruction, Tracking, and Applications

    Michael Zollhöfer;Michael Zollhöfer;Justus Thies;Pablo Garrido;Derek Bradley

  • Time-resolved 3d capture of non-stationary gas flows

    Bradley Atcheson;Ivo Ihrke;Wolfgang Heidrich;Art Tevs

  • Accurate multi-view reconstruction using robust binocular stereo and surface meshing

    D. Bradley;T. Boubekeur;W. Heidrich

  • ETH-XGaze: A Large Scale Dataset for Gaze Estimation Under Extreme Head Pose and Gaze Variation

    Xucong Zhang;Seonwook Park;Thabo Beeler;Derek Bradley

  • Real-time high-fidelity facial performance capture

    Chen Cao;Derek Bradley;Kun Zhou;Thabo Beeler

  • Markerless garment capture

    Derek Bradley;Tiberiu Popa;Alla Sheffer;Wolfgang Heidrich

  • High-quality passive facial performance capture using anchor frames

    Unknown

  • Data-Driven Estimation of Cloth Simulation Models

    E. Miguel;D. Bradley;B. Thomaszewski;B. Bickel

  • Tomographic reconstruction of transparent objects

    Borislav Trifonov;Derek Bradley;Wolfgang Heidrich

  • Synchronization and rolling shutter compensation for consumer video camera arrays

    Derek Bradley;Bradley Atcheson;Ivo Ihrke;Wolfgang Heidrich

  • An anatomically-constrained local deformation model for monocular face capture

    Chenglei Wu;Derek Bradley;Markus Gross;Thabo Beeler

  • MoRF: Morphable Radiance Fields for Multiview Neural Head Modeling

    Unknown

  • Wrinkling Captured Garments Using Space‐Time Data‐Driven Deformation

    Tiberiu Popa;Quan Zhou;Derek Bradley;Vladislav Kraevoy

  • High-quality capture of eyes

    Pascal Bérard;Derek Bradley;Maurizio Nitti;Thabo Beeler

  • Physical face cloning

    Bernd Bickel;Peter Kaufmann;Mélina Skouras;Bernhard Thomaszewski

  • Model-based teeth reconstruction

    Chenglei Wu;Derek Bradley;Pablo Garrido;Michael Zollhöfer

  • Image-based reconstruction and synthesis of dense foliage

    Derek Bradley;Derek Nowrouzezahrai;Paul Beardsley

  • Modeling and estimation of internal friction in cloth

    Eder Miguel;Rasmus Tamstorf;Derek Bradley;Sara C. Schvartzman

  • Practical dynamic facial appearance modeling and acquisition

    Paulo Gotardo;Jérémy Riviere;Derek Bradley;Abhijeet Ghosh

  • Image-based navigation in real environments using panoramas

    D. Bradley;A. Brunton;M. Fiala;G. Roth

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Gross
Markus Gross ETH Zurich
Bernd Bickel
Bernd Bickel ETH Zurich
Wolfgang Heidrich
Wolfgang Heidrich King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Miguel A. Otaduy
Miguel A. Otaduy King Juan Carlos University
Steve Marschner
Steve Marschner Cornell University
Michael Zollhöfer
Michael Zollhöfer Stanford University
Alla Sheffer
Alla Sheffer University of British Columbia
Christian Theobalt
Christian Theobalt Max Planck Institute for Informatics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The growth of online learning has opened up new pathways for students interested in Computer Science and related fields. Many students begin with an online associate's degree, which can provide foundational knowledge and serve as a stepping stone to further studies or entry-level tech positions.

Affordability is a key concern for many learners. Fortunately, there are affordable online colleges that offer computer science programs, making it easier to pursue a degree without accumulating excessive debt. Additionally, flexible admissions options help widen access; some online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa give students with lower GPAs a valuable chance to continue their education.

Beyond core computer science, students often look into interdisciplinary areas. For example, computer science skills are increasingly valuable for those pursuing environmental careers. To see how these fields overlap, explore opportunities through what can you do with an environmental studies degree. These pathways highlight how online learning can support diverse career ambitions in our technology-driven world.

Best Scientists Citing Derek Bradley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles