World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
22045
World Ranking
6790
National Ranking
3679

David A. Hofmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Hofmann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David A. Hofmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Hofmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Hofmann is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research contributions have appeared across multiple scholarly venues and cover various interdisciplinary topics related to sociology, psychology, and management.

Their recent published works include:

  • Out of sight, out of mind: How high-level construals can decrease the ethical framing of risk-mitigating behavior. (2024, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • From Deviance to Cover-Up: The Roles of Confessional Silence and Punitive Policies (2020, Academy of Management Proceedings)
  • Determining the predictors of innovation implementation in healthcare: a quantitative analysis of implementation effectiveness (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Motivating Process Compliance Through Individual Electronic Monitoring: An Empirical Examination of Hand Hygiene in Healthcare (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Broadening Sight at the Board Level: Perspectives from Error Management Research (2020, Academy of Management Proceedings)

Hofmann has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Salvatore J. Affinito
  • Jonathan E. Keeney
  • Michael S. Christian
  • John S. Carroll
  • Michael Fresé

Their work has been published predominantly in venues such as:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Applied Psychology

Their research spans multiple subfields, most notably:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Strategy and Management
  • Accounting

Key topics examined in Hofmann's work include:

  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Risk Management in Financial Firms

Best Publications

  • Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations

    David A. Hofmann;Mark B. Gavin

  • Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes

    Jennifer D. Nahrgang;Frederick P. Morgeson;David A. Hofmann

  • An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models

    David A. Hofmann

  • The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development

    Frederick P. Morgeson;David A. Hofmann

  • Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar.

    David A. Hofmann;Frederick P. Morgeson;Stephen J. Gerras

  • A CROSS-LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING UNSAFE BEHAVIORS AND ACCIDENTS

    David A. Hofmann;Adam Stetzer

  • Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange.

    David A. Hofmann;Frederick P. Morgeson

  • The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research.

    David A. Hofmann;Mark A. Griffin;Mark B. Gavin

  • Reversing the Extraverted Leadership Advantage: The Role of Employee Proactivity

    Adam M. Grant;Francesca Gino;David A. Hofmann

  • An investigation of the relationship between safety climate and medication errors as well as other nurse and patient outcomes.

    David A. Hofmann;Barbara Mark

  • The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: Implications for learning from negative events

    David A. Hofmann;Adam Stetzer

  • Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions.

    Katherine J. Klein;Paul D. Bliese;Steve W. Kozlowski;Fred Dansereau

  • High reliability process industries: Individual, micro, and macro organizational influences on safety performance

    David A. Hofmann;Rick R. Jacobs;Frank Landy

  • 100 years of occupational safety research: From basic protections and work analysis to a multilevel view of workplace safety and risk.

    David A. Hofmann;Michael J. Burke;Dov Zohar

  • Leadership, collective personality, and performance.

    David A. Hofmann;Lisa M. Jones

  • It’s Not All About Me Motivating Hand Hygiene Among Health Care Professionals by Focusing on Patients

    Adam M. Grant;David A. Hofmann

  • Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate

    Mark B. Gavin;David A. Hofmann

  • Organizational Culture and Climate

    Dov M. Zohar;David A. Hofmann

  • Seeking help in the shadow of doubt: the sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice.

    David A. Hofmann;Zhike Lei;Adam M. Grant

  • Dynamic Criteria and the Measurement of Change

    David A. Hofmann;Rick Jacobs;Joseph E. Baratta

  • "Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity:" Erratum.

    Adam M. Grant;Francesca Gino;David A. Hofmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam M. Grant
Adam M. Grant University of Pennsylvania
Francesca Gino
Francesca Gino Harvard University
Michael Frese
Michael Frese Asia School of Business
Frederick P. Morgeson
Frederick P. Morgeson Michigan State University
Michael Belyea
Michael Belyea Arizona State University
Frank J. Landy
Frank J. Landy Pennsylvania State University
Mark A. Griffin
Mark A. Griffin Curtin University
John E. Mathieu
John E. Mathieu University of Connecticut
Dov Zohar
Dov Zohar Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of career opportunities, extending well beyond traditional clinical practice. Many students interested in mental health and helping professions also consider advanced degrees in social work. Social work offers avenues to support individuals, families, and communities, and there’s increasing demand for professionals in this field.

Flexible online education makes these careers even more accessible. For those seeking budget-friendly options, explore the affordable online social work master's programs in the South or the affordable online social work master's degrees in Texas. Online learning allows working professionals to upskill and change careers without relocating.

To get a broader picture of opportunities nationwide, check out the most affordable online master's in social work degree programs in USA. If you’re interested in studying in Ohio, explore the cheapest online social work degrees in Ohio. These resources can help you find programs suited to your goals and budget, making a fulfilling career in mental health and social services more achievable.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Hofmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles