World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard P. Larrick

Richard P. Larrick

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
12642
World Ranking
7723
National Ranking
4141

Richard P. Larrick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Larrick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard P. Larrick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Larrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard P. Larrick is a researcher affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their work primarily falls within the field of Psychology, with a focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics covered by their research encompass Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Forecasting Techniques and Applications, Psychological and Educational Research Studies, as well as Optimism, Hope, and Well-being.

Larrick has published in several academic venues, frequently appearing in:

  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Judgment and Decision Making
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Comparing fast thinking and slow thinking: The relative benefits of interventions, individual differences, and inferential rules" (2020, Judgment and Decision Making)
  • "The power of rank information." (2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  • "Blinding curiosity: Exploring preferences for "blinding" one's own judgment" (2022, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes)
  • "The morality of organization versus organized members: Organizations are attributed more control and responsibility for negative outcomes than are equivalent members." (2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  • "Individual Differences in Overconfidence and their Psychological Bases" (2023, SSRN Electronic Journal)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Jack B. Soll
  • M. Asher Lawson
  • Sean Fath
  • Jessica Reif
  • Andrea E. Abele

Best Publications

  • Goals as Reference Points

    Chip Heath;Richard P. Larrick;George Wu

  • Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture

    Eric J. Johnson;Suzanne B. Shu;Benedict G. C. Dellaert;Craig Fox

  • Conflict Management Style: Accounting for Cross-National Differences

    Michael W. Morris;Katherine Y. Williams;Kwok Leung;Richard Larrick

  • Protecting the self from the negative consequences of risky decisions.

    Robert A. Josephs;Richard P. Larrick;Claude M. Steele;Richard E. Nisbett

  • Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions.

    Jack B. Soll;Richard P. Larrick

  • The MPG Illusion

    Richard P. Larrick;Jack B. Soll

  • Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices

    Dena M. Gromet;Howard Kunreuther;Richard P. Larrick

  • Skilled or Unskilled, but Still Unaware of It: How Perceptions of Difficulty Drive Miscalibration in Relative Comparisons

    Katherine A. Burson;Richard P. Larrick;Joshua Klayman

  • Social comparison and confidence: When thinking you’re better than average predicts overconfidence (and when it does not)

    Richard P. Larrick;Katherine A. Burson;Jack B. Soll

  • Motivational factors in decision theories : the role of self-protection

    Richard P. Larrick

  • Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: Why the powerful don’t listen

    Leigh Plunkett Tost;Francesca Gino;Richard P. Larrick

  • When Power Makes Others Speechless: The Negative Impact of Leader Power on Team Performance

    Leigh Plunkett Tost;Francesca Gino;Richard P. Larrick

  • Avoiding Regret in Decisions with Feedback: A Negotiation Example

    Richard P. Larrick;Terry L. Boles

  • When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution.

    Michael W. Morris;Richard P. Larrick

  • Teaching the Use of Cost-Benefit Reasoning in Everyday Life

    Richard P. Larrick;James N. Morgan;Richard E. Nisbett

  • The wisdom of select crowds.

    Albert E. Mannes;Jack B. Soll;Richard P. Larrick

  • Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks.

    Gregory A. Janicik;Richard P. Larrick

  • The Claiming Effect: Why Players Are More Generous in Social Dilemmas Than in Ultimatum Games

    Richard P. Larrick;Sally Blount

  • Misperceiving negotiation counterparts : When situationally determined bargaining behaviors are attributed to personality traits

    Michael W. Morris;Richard P. Larrick;Steven K. Su

  • Consumer Misunderstanding of Credit Card Use, Payments, and Debt: Causes and Solutions

    Jack B . Soll;Ralph L . Keeney;Richard P . Larrick

  • Who uses the cost-benefit rules of choice? implications for the normative status of microeconomic theory

    Richard P. Larrick;Richard E. Nisbett;James N. Morgan

Frequent Co-Authors

Elke U. Weber
Elke U. Weber Princeton University
Francesca Gino
Francesca Gino Harvard University
Richard E. Nisbett
Richard E. Nisbett University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ellen Peters
Ellen Peters University of Oregon
Michael W. Morris
Michael W. Morris Columbia University
Benedict G. C. Dellaert
Benedict G. C. Dellaert Erasmus University Rotterdam
Daniel G. Goldstein
Daniel G. Goldstein Microsoft (United States)
Craig R. Fox
Craig R. Fox University of California, Los Angeles
John W. Payne
John W. Payne Duke University
David A. Schkade
David A. Schkade University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying Psychology, there are related fields such as Social Work that offer flexible and accessible online degree options. Choosing the right program can help you build a strong foundation for a variety of roles in mental health, counseling, community support, and more.

For learners seeking a smoother academic journey, explore the easiest online social work degree programs in America. These programs are designed for students who need a supportive and manageable pathway toward their career goals.

Speed is also a crucial factor for many. Students with limited time may benefit from the fastest online social work bachelor's degree programs in America. For those in specific regions, there's a focus on accelerated online social work degrees in Arizona and fastest online social work degrees in California.

These online degrees not only offer academic flexibility but also connect you to rewarding career pathways in social services, advocacy, and beyond. Consider your options to find a program that aligns with your timeline, learning style, and professional interests.

Best Scientists Citing Richard P. Larrick

Trending Scientists