What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Statistics
- Marketing
- The Internet
His scientific interests lie mostly in Marketing, Advertising, The Internet, Mass customization and Business studies.
His Marketing research includes themes of Empirical research and Operations research.
The various areas that Benedict G. C. Dellaert examines in his Advertising study include Purchasing and Affect.
The concepts of his Purchasing study are interwoven with issues in Situational ethics and Usability, Technology acceptance model.
He has researched Mass customization in several fields, including Balance, Control and Adaptation.
As a part of the same scientific family, Benedict G. C. Dellaert mostly works in the field of Choice architecture, focusing on Management science and, on occasion, Preference data.
His most cited work include:
- What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review (650 citations)
- Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture (412 citations)
- Marketing Mass-Customized Products: Striking a Balance Between Utility and Complexity (311 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Marketing, Microeconomics, Consumer choice, Advertising and Mental representation.
His work on Consumer behaviour as part of general Marketing study is frequently linked to Conceptual framework, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Microeconomics course of study focuses on Network formation and Stochastic game and Value.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mass customization, Econometrics and Set.
His Advertising study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as The Internet.
He combines subjects such as Sharing economy and Production theory with his study of Value.
He most often published in these fields:
- Marketing (30.43%)
- Microeconomics (20.65%)
- Consumer choice (14.13%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2020)?
- Marketing (30.43%)
- Conceptual framework (14.13%)
- Set (12.32%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Benedict G. C. Dellaert focuses on Marketing, Conceptual framework, Set, Choice architecture and Production.
His Marketing research focuses on Intermediary in particular.
His studies in Set integrate themes in fields like Field and Environmental economics.
Benedict G. C. Dellaert interconnects Quality, Financial literacy, Industrial organization and Portfolio in the investigation of issues within Choice architecture.
His Quality study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Machine learning, Consumer choice and Artificial intelligence.
His Production study incorporates themes from Value, Sharing economy and Consumer behaviour.
Between 2014 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy (47 citations)
- The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy (47 citations)
- Regulating Robo Advice across the Financial Services Industry (19 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Statistics
- Marketing
- The Internet
Benedict G. C. Dellaert mostly deals with Marketing, Conceptual framework, Actuarial science, Welfare and Management science.
His Marketing study focuses on Intermediary in particular.
Conceptual framework is intertwined with Production, Sharing economy, Production theory, Value and Consumer behaviour in his research.
His work carried out in the field of Actuarial science brings together such families of science as Quality, Outcome, Asset allocation and Set.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Preference elicitation, Preference, Asset and Lottery in addition to Welfare.
While the research belongs to areas of Management science, Benedict G. C. Dellaert spends his time largely on the problem of Identification, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Discrete choice and Goal conflict.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
