World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
4727
World Ranking
10541
National Ranking
603

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
4803
World Ranking
9446
National Ranking
280

Jacqueline A. Rushby publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqueline A. Rushby sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jacqueline A. Rushby D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqueline A. Rushby sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacqueline A. Rushby is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work includes contributions to fields such as:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these fields, they have specialized in subfields including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Research topics commonly addressed in their publications cover:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Colleen Loo
  • Donel Martin
  • Frances M. De Blasio
  • Travis Wearne
  • Skye McDonald

The venues where Jacqueline A. Rushby has published most often are:

  • Neuropsychologia
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Brain Injury
  • Neuroimage Reports

Notable recent publications include:

  • tDCS effects on task-related activation and working memory performance in traumatic brain injury: A within group randomized controlled trial (2020, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation)
  • Stimulus intensity effects and sequential processing in the passive auditory ERP (2022, International Journal of Psychophysiology)
  • Regulating emotion following severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial of heart-rate variability biofeedback training (2021, Brain Injury)
  • Little evidence for a reduced late positive potential to unpleasant stimuli in major depressive disorder (2022, Neuroimage Reports)
  • The effect of tDCS electrode montage on attention and working memory (2022, Neuropsychologia)

Best Publications

  • EEG differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions.

    Robert J. Barry;Adam R. Clarke;Stuart J. Johnstone;Christopher A. Magee

  • Caffeine effects on resting-state arousal

    Robert J. Barry;Jacqueline A. Rushby;Mark J. Wallace;Adam R. Clarke

  • Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder

    Danielle Mathersul;Skye McDonald;Jacqueline A Rushby

  • Understanding deficits in empathy after traumatic brain injury: The role of affective responsivity

    Arielle de Sousa;Skye McDonald;Jacqueline Rushby;Shuoqi Li

  • Separation of the components of the late positive complex in an ERP dishabituation paradigm

    Jacqueline A. Rushby;Robert J. Barry;Rebecca J. Doherty

  • Age and gender effects in EEG coherence: I. Developmental trends in normal children.

    Robert J. Barry;Adam R. Clarke;Rory McCarthy;Mark Selikowitz

  • EEG differences in children as a function of resting-state arousal level.

    Robert J. Barry;Adam R. Clarke;Rory McCarthy;Mark Selikowitz

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation influences probabilistic association learning in schizophrenia.

    Ans Vercammen;Ans Vercammen;Jacqueline A. Rushby;Jacqueline A. Rushby;Colleen Loo;Colleen Loo;Brooke Short;Brooke Short

  • An orienting reflex perspective on anteriorisation of the P3 of the event-related potential.

    Robert J. Barry;Jacqueline A. Rushby

  • Why don't you feel how I feel? Insight into the absence of empathy after severe traumatic brain injury.

    Arielle de Sousa;Skye McDonald;Jacqueline Rushby;Shuoqi Li

  • The effects of inhibitory control training on alcohol consumption, implicit alcohol-related cognitions and brain electrical activity

    Claire Bowley;Cameron Faricy;Bronwyn Hegarty;Stuart J. Johnstone

  • Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task.

    Craig J. Gonsalvez;Robert J. Barry;Jacqueline A. Rushby;John Polich

  • Arousal and activation in a continuous performance task: An exploration of state effects in normal children

    Robert J. Barry;Adam R. Clarke;Rory McCarthy;Mark Selikowitz

  • Timing of caffeine's impact on autonomic and central nervous system measures: clarification of arousal effects.

    Robert J. Barry;Adam R. Clarke;Stuart J. Johnstone;Jacqueline A. Rushby

  • Changes in emotional empathy, affective responsivity, and behavior following severe traumatic brain injury.

    Arielle de Sousa;Skye McDonald;Jacqueline Rushby

  • Evidence for differentiation of arousal and activation in normal adults.

    S. Mohammad Vaezmousavi;Robert J. Barry;Jacqueline A. Rushby;Adam R. Clarke

  • Arousal and activation effects on physiological and behavioral responding during a continuous performance task.

    VaezMousavi Sm;Barry Rj;Rushby Ja;Clarke Ar

  • All alone with sweaty palms--physiological arousal and ostracism.

    Michelle Kelly;Skye McDonald;Jacqueline Rushby

  • Event-related potentials in the auditory oddball as a function of EEG alpha phase at stimulus onset.

    Robert J. Barry;Jacqueline A. Rushby;Stuart J. Johnstone;Adam R. Clarke

  • Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task.

    Robert J. Barry;Stuart J. Johnstone;Adam R. Clarke;Jacqueline A. Rushby

Frequent Co-Authors

Skye McDonald
Skye McDonald University of New South Wales
Robert J. Barry
Robert J. Barry University of Wollongong
Adam R. Clarke
Adam R. Clarke University of Wollongong
Colleen Loo
Colleen Loo University of New South Wales
Stuart J. Johnstone
Stuart J. Johnstone University of Wollongong
Olivier Piguet
Olivier Piguet University of Sydney
Thomas W. Weickert
Thomas W. Weickert SUNY Upstate Medical University
John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney
Rodney J. Croft
Rodney J. Croft University of Wollongong
Donel Martin
Donel Martin University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in neuroscience, exploring your educational options is important. There are many interesting majors that pay well and can complement or expand your neuroscience background, such as computer science, biomedical engineering, or data analytics.

Studying online is increasingly popular and flexible. Many students look for accredited online colleges that accept fafsa, making higher education more affordable and accessible, especially for those balancing work or family obligations.

Some learners pursue certifications online to quickly gain specialized skills in areas like data science, health informatics, or psychology. These credentials can boost your employability or help you transition into high-demand fields related to neuroscience.

If you're looking for an efficient route to gain qualifications, consider checking the list of easy online degrees that might align with your strengths and career interests. This can lead to greater flexibility and help you enter the workforce sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Jacqueline A. Rushby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles