World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 76 492 422 18 13 826 29214

Martin Weber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Weber between 1951 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Weber published across 76 years, from 1951 to 2026, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 98 publications in 2024. 34 of the 1,130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 98. Peak 98 publications in 2024. 1951: 1 publication 1952: 0 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 1 publication 1957: 0 publications 1958: 7 publications 1959: 3 publications 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 3 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 8 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 32 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 21 publications 1994: 21 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 28 publications 2000: 70 publications 2001: 31 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 36 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 36 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 37 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 62 publications 2023: 77 publications 2024: 98 publications 2025: 32 publications 2026: 2 publications
1951 2026

1,130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Weber: publications per year, 1951 to 2026
Year Publications
1951 1
1952 0
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 1
1957 0
1958 7
1959 3
1960 1
1961 0
1962 1
1963 0
1964 2
1965 0
1966 3
1967 0
1968 8
1969 1
1970 2
1971 3
1972 1
1973 3
1974 2
1975 0
1976 5
1977 2
1978 8
1979 3
1980 3
1981 0
1982 5
1983 7
1984 3
1985 9
1986 13
1987 3
1988 9
1989 12
1990 32
1991 6
1992 16
1993 21
1994 21
1995 12
1996 9
1997 17
1998 16
1999 28
2000 70
2001 31
2002 14
2003 36
2004 21
2005 36
2006 21
2007 37
2008 17
2009 23
2010 39
2011 23
2012 15
2013 20
2014 25
2015 18
2016 21
2017 29
2018 15
2019 22
2020 13
2021 14
2022 62
2023 77
2024 98
2025 32
2026 2
Total 1,130
Download as CSV

Martin Weber publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Weber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 570+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 826 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100 826
Download as CSV

Martin Weber D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Weber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45 76
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Germany Leader Award
  • 2020 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Martin Weber is affiliated with the University of Mannheim in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on fields within Economics, Econometrics and Finance, as well as Decision Sciences.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment

Their research contributions span several subfields, notably:

  • General Decision Sciences
  • Finance
  • Accounting
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Safety Research

Martin Weber has published in multiple venues, with the most frequent being:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • European Finance Review
  • Management Science
  • Experimental Economics
  • Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Closing a mental account: the realization effect for gains and losses (2020, Experimental Economics)
  • How to Alleviate Correlation Neglect in Investment Decisions (2022, Management Science)
  • Dynamic Inconsistency in Risky Choice: Evidence from the Lab and Field (2020, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • The Disposition Effect in Boom and Bust Markets (2021, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • Dynamic Inconsistency in Risky Choice: Evidence from the Lab and Field (2023, SSRN Electronic Journal)

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Pascal Kieren
  • Jan Müller-Dethard
  • Alex Imas
  • Michael Ungeheuer
  • Rawley Heimer

In recognition of their contributions, Martin Weber became a member of Academia Europaea in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity

    Colin F. Camerer;Martin Weber

  • The Disposition Effect in Securities Trading: An Experimental Analysis

    Martin Weber;Colin F. Camerer

  • Overconfidence and trading volume

    Markus Glaser;Martin Weber;Martin Weber

  • The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis

    Colin F. Camerer;George Loewenstein;Martin Weber

  • Informational efficiency of credit default swap and stock markets: The impact of credit rating announcements

    Lars Norden;Martin Weber;Martin Weber

  • Bankbetriebslehre

    Unknown

  • Loan growth and riskiness of banks.

    Daniel Foos;Lars Norden;Martin Weber;Martin Weber

  • The Co‐movement of Credit Default Swap, Bond and Stock Markets: an Empirical Analysis

    Lars Norden;Martin Weber

  • The role of non-financial factors in internal credit ratings

    Jens Grunert;Lars Norden;Martin Weber;Martin Weber

  • Bank behavior based on internal credit ratings of borrowers

    Achim Machauer;Martin Weber

  • Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making

    Martin Weber;Katrin Borcherding

  • Decision Making with Incomplete Information

    Martin Weber

  • Decline of the sea turtles: causes and prevention

    Unknown

  • Reference-Point Formation and Updating

    Manel Baucells;Martin Weber;Frank Welfens

  • Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty

    Mohammed Abdellaoui;Frank Vossmann;Martin Weber

  • Spanish Aerobiology Network (REA): management and quality manual

    Unknown

  • A new ultrafast superionic Li-conductor: ion dynamics in Li 11 Si 2 PS 12 and comparison with other tetragonal LGPS-type electrolytes

    Unknown

  • Home-Bias in International Stock Return Expectations

    Michael Kilka;Martin Weber

  • Risk-value models

    Rakesh K. Sarin;Martin Weber

  • Ambiguity Aversion, Comparative Ignorance, and Decision Context

    Craig R. Fox;Martin Weber

  • Credit Line Usage, Checking Account Activity, and Default Risk of Bank Borrowers

    Lars Norden;Martin Weber

  • Who takes Risks When and Why: Determinants of Changes in Investor Risk Taking*

    Martin Weber;Elke U. Weber;Alen Nosić

  • What Determines the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function Under Uncertainty

    Michael Kilka;Martin Weber

  • Rational Decision Making

    Franz Eisenführ;Martin Weber;Thomas Langer

  • The effects of splitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement

    Martin Weber;Franz Eisenführ;Detlof von Winterfeldt

  • Environmental Epidemiology, Volume 1: Public Health and Hazardous Wastes

    Unknown

  • Effects of ambiguity in market experiments

    Rakesh K. Sarin;Martin Weber

  • QT interval variability in body surface ECG: measurement, physiological basis, and clinical value: position statement and consensus guidance endorsed by the European Heart�…

    Unknown

  • How Riskily Do I Invest? The Role of Risk Attitudes, Risk Perceptions, and Overconfidence

    Alen Nosić;Martin Weber

  • Communicating asset risk: how name recognition and the format of historic volatility information affect risk perception and investment decisions.

    Elke U. Weber;Niklas Siebenmorgen;Martin Weber

  • Loan Growth and Riskiness of Banks

    Daniel Foos;Martin Weber;Lars Norden

Frequent Co-Authors

Cristina Fernandez Bedoya
Cristina Fernandez Bedoya University of Florence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up dynamic online study options and new career opportunities. For those passionate about advocacy and community support, a 1 year online master's in social work provides a fast track to licensed practice in social work fields.

Students interested in human behavior may consider an accelerated bachelor's in psychology, which helps graduates quickly begin careers in counseling, research, or pursue further specialization. These programs not only save valuable time but also provide flexibility for working professionals.

For those aiming to become licensed counselors, choosing from cacrep-accredited counseling programs ensures your degree meets national standards required in clinical practice. Additionally, an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy readies graduates for roles supporting families, couples, and children.

These online pathways enable students to balance studies with personal responsibilities while preparing for impactful careers across a range of communities and clinical settings in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Weber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles