World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
19080
World Ranking
18525
National Ranking
9233

Dennis F. Bandyk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dennis F. Bandyk sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 281 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Dennis F. Bandyk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dennis F. Bandyk sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dennis F. Bandyk is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. The research primarily focuses on medicine, with specific attention to pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, internal medicine, and epidemiology.

Their work covers a range of topics within vascular and cardiovascular health, including:

  • Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Dennis F. Bandyk has contributed to discussions on follow-up care after carotid endarterectomy and stenting, reflecting expertise in cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases. Notable recent publications include:

  • Follow-up after carotid endarterectomy and stenting: What to look for and why (2020), published in Seminars in Vascular Surgery
  • Aortic aneurysm screening using duplex ultrasound: Choosing wisely who to examine (2020), published in Seminars in Vascular Surgery
  • Common Iliac Artery Aneurysm Repair with Hypogastric Preservation via Balloon-Expandable Covered Stents Using the Eyelet Technique-Iliac Branched Devices Still Inappropriate in Many Patients (2020), published in Annals of Vascular Surgery
  • Novel Approach to Treatment of Chronic Iliocaval Occlusion Utilizing Covered Stents (2020), published in Annals of Vascular Surgery
  • Resurrection of Chronically Occluded Prosthetic Bypass Grafts in a Single Stage with Suction Thrombectomy and Intervention (2020), published in Annals of Vascular Surgery

Their research has been disseminated predominantly through two frequent publication venues:

  • Seminars in Vascular Surgery
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery

Dennis F. Bandyk collaborates regularly with several researchers, including:

  • John S. Lane
  • Mahmoud B. Malas
  • Andrew Barleben
  • Rachel M. Jensen
  • Sean Flynn

Their scholarly contributions span across 18 publications focused on medicine, with substantial emphasis on conditions affecting the vascular system and methods for improving surgical outcomes and disease management.

Best Publications

  • Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

    Frank A. Lederle;Samuel E. Wilson;Gary R. Johnson;Donovan B. Reinke

  • Prevalence and Associations of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detected through Screening

    Frank A. Lederle;Gary R. Johnson;Samuel E. Wilson;Edmund P. Chute

  • The Aneurysm Detection and Management Study Screening Program Validation Cohort and Final Results

    Frank A. Lederle;Gary R. Johnson;Samuel E. Wilson;Edmund P. Chute

  • Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair

    Frank A. Lederle;Gary R. Johnson;Samuel E. Wilson;David J. Ballard

  • Results of PREVENT III: a multicenter, randomized trial of edifoligide for the prevention of vein graft failure in lower extremity bypass surgery.

    Michael S. Conte;Dennis F. Bandyk;Alexander W. Clowes;Gregory L. Moneta

  • Carotid Artery Stenosis Following Endarterectomy

    R. Eugene Zierler;Dennis F. Bandyk;Brian L. Thiele;D. Eugene Strandness

  • Relationship of age, gender, race, and body size to infrarenal aortic diameter

    Frank A. Lederle;Gary R. Johnson;Samuel E. Wilson;Ian L. Gordon

  • The diabetic foot: Pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment.

    Dennis F. Bandyk

  • A low flow velocity predicts failure of femoropopliteal and femorotibial bypass grafts.

    D F Bandyk;R F Cato;J B Towne

  • Technical factors affecting autogenous vein graft failure: Observations from a large multicenter trial

    Andres Schanzer;Nathanael Hevelone;Christopher D. Owens;Michael Belkin

  • Monitoring functional patency of in situ saphenous vein bypasses: the impact of a surveillance protocol and elective revision.

    Dennis F. Bandyk;David D. Schmitt;Gary R. Seabrook;Mark B. Adams

  • Experience with in situ saphenous vein bypasses during 1981 to 1989: determinant factors of long-term patency.

    Thomas M. Bergamini;Jonathan B. Towne;Dennis F. Bandyk;Gary R. Seabrook

  • Risk stratification in critical limb ischemia: derivation and validation of a model to predict amputation-free survival using multicenter surgical outcomes data.

    Andres Schanzer;Jessica Mega;Judith Meadows;Russell H. Samson

  • Vascular surgical site infection: risk factors and preventive measures

    Dennis F. Bandyk

  • Failure of foot salvage in patients with end-stage renal disease after surgical revascularization.

    Brad L. Johnson;Marc H. Glickman;Dennis F. Bandyk;Glenn E. Esses

  • Aortofemoral Graft Infection due to Staphylococcus epidermidis

    Dennis F. Bandyk;George A. Berni;Brian L. Thiele;Jonathan B. Towne

  • Bacterial adherence to vascular prostheses: A determinant of graft infectivity

    David D. Schmitt;Dennis F. Bandyk;Arch J. Pequet;Jonathan B. Towne

  • Expanded application of in situ replacement for prosthetic graft infection.

    Dennis F. Bandyk;Michael L. Novotney;Martin R. Back;Brad L. Johnson

  • Use of Rifampin-Soaked Gelatin-Sealed Polyester Grafts for in Situ Treatment of Primary Aortic and Vascular Prosthetic Infections

    Dennis F. Bandyk;Michael L. Novotney;Brad L. Johnson;Martin R. Back

  • Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair

    F.A. Lederle;G.R. Johnson;S.E. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory L. Moneta
Gregory L. Moneta Oregon Health & Science University
Michael S. Conte
Michael S. Conte University of California, San Francisco
Alexander W. Clowes
Alexander W. Clowes University of Washington
Samuel E. Wilson
Samuel E. Wilson University of California, Irvine
Michael Belkin
Michael Belkin Tel Aviv University
Alan B. Lumsden
Alan B. Lumsden Houston Methodist
Stuart R. Lipsitz
Stuart R. Lipsitz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Alan B. Cantor
Alan B. Cantor Harvard University
David C. Chang
David C. Chang Massachusetts General Hospital
Thomas F. O'Donnell
Thomas F. O'Donnell Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, you might also be interested in other healthcare-related degrees and career paths available online. There are many alternatives for those who want to work in healthcare but are exploring roles outside of becoming a physician.

For those drawn to leadership positions, pursuing the best online healthcare administration degree can lead to opportunities in hospital management and policy-making. Professionals seeking career advancement while balancing work can also explore whats the best online mha program for working adults for a flexible way to earn a respected master's degree.

Nursing is another essential area in healthcare. Registered nurses looking to advance can find streamlined options through asn to nurse practitioner programs, which fast-track graduates into highly demanded clinical roles.

Lastly, those passionate about patient wellness and lifestyle medicine may benefit from a nutrition bachelor degree online, preparing graduates for roles in dietetics, counseling, and community health.

Online degrees offer flexibility, making it easier for students and working professionals to take the next step in their healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Dennis F. Bandyk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles