World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
23461
World Ranking
19337
National Ranking
9627

Samuel E. Wilson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel E. Wilson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 383 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Samuel E. Wilson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel E. Wilson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Samuel E. Wilson is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Surgery, Ophthalmology, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Evaluating Primary Treatment for People with Advanced Glaucoma, 2024, published in Ophthalmology
  • Community-based wind energy development does not work? Empirical evidence from residents in Canada and Ireland, 2024, published in Energy Policy
  • A Systems Approach to Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, and Biotransport, 2024, published in Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
  • Output force and ratio of laparoscopic graspers: an evaluation of operating room ergonomics, 2023, published in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Quantifying Lumbar Mobilization With Inertial Measurement Unit, 2020, published in Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Anthony King
  • Augusto Azuara-Blanco
  • J M Sparrow
  • Eleni Nikita
  • Obaid Kousha

The venues where Wilson has published most often include:

  • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
  • Ophthalmology
  • Energy Policy
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Wilson's work covers several main topics, such as:

  • Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions

Best Publications

  • Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

    Frank A. Lederle;Samuel E. Wilson;Gary R. Johnson;Donovan B. Reinke

  • Prevalence and Associations of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detected through Screening

    Frank A. Lederle;Gary R. Johnson;Samuel E. Wilson;Edmund P. Chute

  • Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

    M R Mayberg;S E Wilson;F Yatsu;D G Weiss

  • Complications After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: A Review of 3464 Cases

    Yale D. Podnos;Juan C. Jimenez;Samuel E. Wilson;C. Melinda Stevens

  • The Aneurysm Detection and Management Study Screening Program Validation Cohort and Final Results

    Frank A. Lederle;Gary R. Johnson;Samuel E. Wilson;Edmund P. Chute

  • Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair

    Frank A. Lederle;Gary R. Johnson;Samuel E. Wilson;David J. Ballard

  • The Relationship Between Hospital Volume and Outcome in Bariatric Surgery at Academic Medical Centers

    Ninh T. Nguyen;Mahbod Paya;C Melinda Stevens;Shahrzad Mavandadi

  • Reduced Mortality From Bleeding Pseudocysts and Pseudoaneurysms Caused by Pancreatitis

    Bruce E. Stabile;Samuel E. Wilson;Haile T. Debas

  • Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus operation for peripheral arteriosclerosis * ** ★: Report of a prospective randomized trial in a selected group of patients

    Samuel E. Wilson;Gerald L. Wolf;Anne P. Cross

  • Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass.

    Nancy Puzziferri;Iselin T. Austrheim-Smith;Bruce M. Wolfe;Samuel E. Wilson

  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women

    Frank A. Lederle;Gary R. Johnson;Samuel E. Wilson

  • Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.

    Kamal M F Itani;Samuel E Wilson;Samir S Awad;Erin H Jensen

  • Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery.

    Ninh T. Nguyen;Jeffrey Root;Kambiz Zainabadi;Allen Sabio

  • Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Frank A. Lederle;Samuel E. Wilson;Gary R. Johnson;Donovan B. Reinke

  • Telavancin Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Organisms

    Martin E. Stryjewski;Donald R. Graham;Samuel E. Wilson;William O'Riordan

  • Relationship of age, gender, race, and body size to infrarenal aortic diameter

    Frank A. Lederle;Gary R. Johnson;Samuel E. Wilson;Ian L. Gordon

  • Improved Survival Following Massive Transfusion in Patients Who Have Undergone Trauma

    Marianne E. Cinat;William C. Wallace;Frank Nastanski;Justin West

  • Effect of the 80-Hour Workweek on Resident Burnout

    Dmitri V. Gelfand;Yale D. Podnos;Joseph C. Carmichael;Darin J. Saltzman

  • Clinical Significance of Type II Endoleak after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

    Dmitri V. Gelfand;Geoffrey H. White;Samuel E. Wilson

  • Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair

    F.A. Lederle;G.R. Johnson;S.E. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ninh T. Nguyen
Ninh T. Nguyen University of California, Irvine
Dennis F. Bandyk
Dennis F. Bandyk University of California, San Diego
Michael W. Berns
Michael W. Berns University of California, Irvine
Jonathan R. Hiatt
Jonathan R. Hiatt University of California, Los Angeles
Timothy C. Fabian
Timothy C. Fabian University of Tennessee Health Science Center
David C. Chang
David C. Chang Massachusetts General Hospital
Kamal M.F. Itani
Kamal M.F. Itani Boston University
Joseph S. Solomkin
Joseph S. Solomkin University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Mark A. Talamini
Mark A. Talamini Stony Brook University
Vance G. Fowler
Vance G. Fowler Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to medicine can open diverse and flexible career pathways. Many prospective students are concerned about tuition fees, and choosing the cost of mha degree options can help you find affordable master’s programs in healthcare administration. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles in hospitals and health organizations.

For those seeking advanced clinical roles, pursuing the least expensive dnp programs gives nurses and practitioners a pathway to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree online, often at a lower cost and with greater flexibility.

If you are interested in pharmacy, accredited online pharmacy programs enable students to study for a PharmD remotely, making it more accessible for working professionals.

Technology is transforming healthcare, and earning a degree from reputable healthcare informatics degree programs prepares students for careers in health information management. This field is rapidly growing as hospitals and clinics increase their reliance on digital records and analytics.

Best Scientists Citing Samuel E. Wilson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles