World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 31 9654 9237 713 687 84 4312

Mark D. Wyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark D. Wyer between 1984 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark D. Wyer published across 39 years, from 1984 to 2022, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2007. 2 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2007. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication
1984 2022

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark D. Wyer: publications per year, 1984 to 2022
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 4
1995 5
1996 4
1997 4
1998 3
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 4
2006 3
2007 8
2008 7
2009 8
2010 7
2011 3
2012 5
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 2
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
2022 1
Total 86
Download as CSV

Mark D. Wyer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Wyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 84 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 84
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark D. Wyer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Wyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26 31
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark D. Wyer is affiliated with Aberystwyth University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans environmental science and nursing, with a particular focus on wastewater treatment, water quality, and child nutrition related to water access.

The main fields of study for Wyer include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Nursing

Within these fields, they have worked on several subfields:

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Key research topics covered by Wyer include:

  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access

Their recent publication record features the following paper:

  • Effectiveness of constructed farm wetlands in attenuating faecal indicator fluxes to watercourses from yard runoff on livestock farms (2021), published in Water and Environment Journal

This venue has been the primary outlet for their publications.

Frequent collaborators in Wyer's work include:

  • David Kay
  • Cheryl M. Davies
  • Carol Francis
  • Carl Stapleton
  • Aldwyn Clarke

These coauthors have contributed multiple publications alongside Wyer, indicating ongoing collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Predicting likelihood of gastroenteritis from sea bathing: results from randomised exposure

    D Kay;F Jones;M.D Wyer;J.M Fleisher

  • Surveillance of adenoviruses and noroviruses in European recreational waters

    A. Peter Wyn-Jones;Annalaura Carducci;Nigel Cook;Martin D’Agostino

  • Relationships between microbial water quality and environmental conditions in coastal recreational waters: the fylde coast, UK

    John Crowther;David Kay;Mark D. Wyer

  • Faecal-indicator concentrations in waters draining lowland pastoral catchments in the UK: relationships with land use and farming practices

    John Crowther;David Kay;Mark D Wyer

  • Marine waters contaminated with domestic sewage: nonenteric illnesses associated with bather exposure in the United Kingdom.

    Jay M. Fleisher;David Kay;Roland L. Salmon;Frank Jones

  • Modelling faecal coliform dynamics in streams and rivers

    Jeremy Wilkinson;Alan Jenkins;Mark Wyer;David Kay

  • Faecal indicator organism concentrations in sewage and treated effluents

    D. Kay;J. Crowther;C.M. Stapleton;M.D. Wyer

  • Derivation of numerical values for the World Health Organization guidelines for recreational waters

    David Kay;James K Bartram;Annette Prüss;Nick Ashbolt

  • Faecal streptococci as indicators of faecal contamination in water.

    A.F. Godfree;D. Kay;M.D. Wyer

  • Catchment microbial dynamics: the emergence of a research agenda

    D. Kay;A. C. Edwards;R. C. Ferrier;C. Francis

  • Decay of intestinal enterococci concentrations in high-energy estuarine and coastal waters: towards real-time T90 values for modelling faecal indicators in recreational waters.

    D. Kay;C. M. Stapleton;M. Wyer;A. T. McDonald

  • Faecal indicator organism concentrations and catchment export coefficients in the UK.

    D. Kay;J. Crowther;C. M. Stapleton;M. D. Wyer

  • Water and Non-Water-Related Risk Factors for Gastroenteritis among Bathers Exposed to Sewage-Contaminated Marine Waters

    Jay M Fleisher;F Jones;D Kay;R Stanwell-Smith

  • Modelling faecal indicator concentrations in large rural catchments using land use and topographic data

    J. Crowther;M.D. Wyer;M. Bradford;D. Kay

  • Predicting faecal indicator fluxes using digital land use data in the UK's sentinel Water Framework Directive catchment: The Ribble study

    David Kay;Mark Wyer;John Crowther;Carl Stapleton

  • Farmyards, an overlooked source for highly contaminated runoff.

    Anthony C. Edwards;David Kay;Adrian T. McDonald;Carol Francis

  • Reducing fluxes of faecal indicator compliance parameters to bathing waters from diffuse agricultural sources: the Brighouse Bay study, Scotland.

    D. Kay;M. Aitken;J. Crowther;I. Dickson

  • Quantification and control of microbial pollution from agriculture: a new policy challenge?

    D. Kay;J. Crowther;L. Fewtrell;C.A. Francis

  • Microbial water pollution: a screening tool for initial catchment-scale assessment and source apportionment.

    D. Kay;S. Anthony;J. Crowther;B. J. Chambers

  • Evaluating the operational utility of a Bacteroidales quantitative PCR-based MST approach in determining the source of faecal indicator organisms at a UK bathing water

    Carl Michael Stapleton;David Kay;Mark David Wyer;Cheryl Margaret Davies

Frequent Co-Authors

David Kay
David Kay Aberystwyth University
Adrian McDonald
Adrian McDonald University of Leeds
Anthony C. Edwards
Anthony C. Edwards Scotland's Rural College
BinLiang Lin
BinLiang Lin Tsinghua University
Nigel D. Paul
Nigel D. Paul Lancaster University
Roger Alexander Falconer
Roger Alexander Falconer Cardiff University
Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Nicholas J. Ashbolt Queensland University of Technology
Ana Maria de Roda Husman
Ana Maria de Roda Husman Utrecht University
Rosina Girones
Rosina Girones University of Barcelona
Alan Jenkins
Alan Jenkins UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads students to consider complementary fields that enhance their expertise and career prospects. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a crucial area for environmental professionals, offering advanced tools for spatial data analysis. To develop these skills, many students turn to programs featuring the best GIS programs in the US. These programs equip graduates with valuable insights into earth sciences, resource management, and urban planning.

For those interested in public policy or administrative roles within environmental sectors, pursuing a degree such as a Master of Public Administration is advantageous. Accelerated options like the one year MPA enable professionals to gain leadership skills efficiently while focusing on sustainable development and environmental regulations.

Understanding social dynamics is also essential in environmental work, as it often involves community engagement and addressing societal impacts. Online degrees like the best online sociology bachelor degree provide vital knowledge on human behavior, social structures, and cultural factors relevant to environmental challenges.

Finally, experienced educators and practitioners aiming to expand their influence in environmental education or policy might pursue advanced credentials without the traditional dissertation requirement. Programs such as online Ed D programs without dissertation offer flexible pathways to doctoral-level expertise, enabling students to balance professional goals with academic advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Wyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles