World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexandria B. Boehm

Alexandria B. Boehm

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
85
Citations
21090
World Ranking
766
National Ranking
327

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
85
Citations
20510
World Ranking
3215
National Ranking
1627

Alexandria B. Boehm publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandria B. Boehm sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 285 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Alexandria B. Boehm D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandria B. Boehm sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexandria B. Boehm is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Infectious Diseases. Other notable subfields include Biomedical Engineering, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, and Ecology.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Alexandria B. Boehm has coauthored numerous publications with several frequent collaborators, including:

  • Marlene K. Wolfe (96 coauthored works)
  • Dorothea Duong (55 coauthored works)
  • Bradley J. White (46 coauthored works)
  • Krista R. Wigginton (32 coauthored works)
  • Bridgette Hughes (30 coauthored works)

Their research has been featured predominantly in the following publication venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 62 publications
  • Environmental Science & Technology - 33 publications
  • Environmental Science & Technology Letters - 21 publications
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology - 9 publications
  • Environmental Science Water Research & Technology - 7 publications

Some recent papers by Alexandria B. Boehm include:

  • Wastewater-Based Epidemiology: Global Collaborative to Maximize Contributions in the Fight Against COVID-19, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater Settled Solids Is Associated with COVID-19 Cases in a Large Urban Sewershed, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Environmental DNA reveals seasonal shifts and potential interactions in a marine community, 2020, Nature Communications
  • The Environmental Microbiology Minimum Information (EMMI) Guidelines: qPCR and dPCR Quality and Reporting for Environmental Microbiology, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Wastewater concentrations of human influenza, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, and seasonal coronavirus nucleic-acids during the COVID-19 pandemic: a surveillance study, 2023, The Lancet Microbe

Best Publications

  • Rapid water disinfection using vertically aligned MoS2 nanofilms and visible light

    Chong Liu;Desheng Kong;Po Chun Hsu;Hongtao Yuan

  • Shifts in the relative abundance of ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria and archaea across physicochemical gradients in a subterranean estuary

    Alyson E. Santoro;Christopher A. Francis;Nicholas R. De Sieyes;Alexandria B. Boehm

  • Quantification of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Shedding and Decay Rates for Three Marine Fish.

    Lauren M. Sassoubre;Kevan M. Yamahara;Luke D. Gardner;Barbara A. Block

  • Wastewater-Based Epidemiology: Global Collaborative to Maximize Contributions in the Fight Against COVID-19.

    Aaron Bivins;Devin North;Arslan Ahmad;Warish Ahmed

  • Decadal and shorter period variability of surf zone water quality at Huntington Beach, California.

    Boehm Ab;Grant Sb;Kim Jh;Mowbray Sl

  • SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater Settled Solids Is Associated with COVID-19 Cases in a Large Urban Sewershed.

    Katherine E Graham;Stephanie K Loeb;Marlene K Wolfe;David Catoe

  • Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.

    Alexandria B. Boehm;Laurie C. Van De Werfhorst;John F. Griffith;Patricia A. Holden

  • Environmental DNA reveals seasonal shifts and potential interactions in a marine community

    Anni Djurhuus;Collin J. Closek;Ryan P. Kelly;Kathleen J. Pitz

  • Sunlight-mediated inactivation of health-relevant microorganisms in water: a review of mechanisms and modeling approaches

    Kara L. Nelson;Alexandria B. Boehm;Robert J. Davies-Colley;Michael C. Dodd

  • Wastewater-Based Estimation of the Effective Reproductive Number of SARS-CoV-2

    Unknown

  • Biomonitoring of marine vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding.

    Elizabeth A. Andruszkiewicz;Hilary A. Starks;Francisco P. Chavez;Lauren M. Sassoubre

  • Wastewater-Based Detection of Two Influenza Outbreaks

    Unknown

  • Beach Sands along the California Coast Are Diffuse Sources of Fecal Bacteria to Coastal Waters

    Kevan M. Yamahara;Blythe A. Layton;and Alyson E. Santoro;Alexandria B. Boehm

  • The Environmental Microbiology Minimum Information (EMMI) Guidelines: qPCR and dPCR Quality and Reporting for Environmental Microbiology.

    Mark A Borchardt;Alexandria B Boehm;Marc Salit;Marc Salit;Susan K Spencer

  • Tiered Approach for Identification of a Human Fecal Pollution Source at a Recreational Beach: Case Study at Avalon Bay, Catalina Island, California

    Alexandria B Boehm;Jed A Fuhrman;Robert D Mrse;Stanley B Grant

  • Generation of enterococci bacteria in a coastal saltwater marsh and its impact on surf zone water quality.

    S B Grant;B F Sanders;A B Boehm;J A Redman

  • Scaling and management of fecal indicator bacteria in runoff from a coastal urban watershed in southern California.

    Ryan L. Reeves;Stanley B. Grant;Robert D. Mrse;Carmen M. Copil Oancea

  • A sea change ahead for recreational water quality criteria

    Alexandria B. Boehm;Nicholas J. Ashbolt;John M. Colford;Lee E. Dunbar

  • Denitrifier Community Composition along a Nitrate and Salinity Gradient in a Coastal Aquifer

    Alyson E. Santoro;Alexandria B. Boehm;Christopher A. Francis

  • Fecal Contamination and Diarrheal Pathogens on Surfaces and in Soils among Tanzanian Households with and without Improved Sanitation

    Amy J. Pickering;Timothy R. Julian;Sara J. Marks;Mia C. Mattioli

  • Engineered Infiltration Systems for Urban Stormwater Reclamation

    Janel E. Grebel;Janel E. Grebel;Sanjay K. Mohanty;Sanjay K. Mohanty;Andrew A. Torkelson;Andrew A. Torkelson;Alexandria B. Boehm;Alexandria B. Boehm

  • Persistence of nucleic acid markers of health-relevant organisms in seawater microcosms: implications for their use in assessing risk in recreational waters.

    Sarah P. Walters;Kevan M. Yamahara;Alexandria B. Boehm

  • Growth of Enterococci in Unaltered, Unseeded Beach Sands Subjected to Tidal Wetting

    Kevan M. Yamahara;Sarah P. Walters;Alexandria B. Boehm

Frequent Co-Authors

Orin C. Shanks
Orin C. Shanks Environmental Protection Agency
Kara L. Nelson
Kara L. Nelson University of California, Berkeley
Stephen B. Weisberg
Stephen B. Weisberg Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Adina Paytan
Adina Paytan University of California, Santa Cruz
Helena M. Solo-Gabriele
Helena M. Solo-Gabriele University of Miami
Thomas A. Edge
Thomas A. Edge Environment and Climate Change Canada
Stanley B. Grant
Stanley B. Grant Virginia Tech
Michael J. Sadowsky
Michael J. Sadowsky University of Minnesota
Rachel T. Noble
Rachel T. Noble University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Stefan Wuertz
Stefan Wuertz Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Professionals often combine environmental knowledge with technical skills like Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to analyze spatial data and address real-world ecological challenges. For those interested in this focus, exploring the best gis schools can enhance your expertise and employability.

Leadership and policy also play vital roles in environmental work. Pursuing programs like the best online masters in public administration equips students with skills to influence environmental policy and community management, blending science with governance.

Understanding societal impacts and human behavior is crucial in environmental advocacy and sustainability efforts. Online options such as a bachelors degree in sociology online provide foundational insights into social systems relevant to environmental change.

For professionals aiming to advance research or leadership roles without the extensive commitment of a traditional dissertation, doctoral programs online no dissertation offer flexible pathways to doctoral qualifications, making higher education more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Alexandria B. Boehm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles