World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexandria B. Boehm

Alexandria B. Boehm

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 85 769 732 327 303 285 21090
Biology and Biochemistry 85 3214 2956 1626 1460 263 20510

Alexandria B. Boehm publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alexandria B. Boehm between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alexandria B. Boehm published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 15.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2024. 41 of the 460 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2024. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 48 publications 2023: 54 publications 2024: 57 publications 2025: 37 publications 2026: 4 publications
1998 2026

460 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alexandria B. Boehm: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 3
2003 2
2004 4
2005 3
2006 8
2007 9
2008 6
2009 10
2010 10
2011 22
2012 11
2013 24
2014 20
2015 13
2016 17
2017 16
2018 15
2019 11
2020 20
2021 32
2022 48
2023 54
2024 57
2025 37
2026 4
Total 460
Download as CSV

Alexandria B. Boehm publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandria B. Boehm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 285 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130 285
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Alexandria B. Boehm D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandria B. Boehm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43 85
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Alexandria B. Boehm is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Infectious Diseases. Other notable subfields include Biomedical Engineering, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, and Ecology.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Alexandria B. Boehm has coauthored numerous publications with several frequent collaborators, including:

  • Marlene K. Wolfe (96 coauthored works)
  • Dorothea Duong (55 coauthored works)
  • Bradley J. White (46 coauthored works)
  • Krista R. Wigginton (32 coauthored works)
  • Bridgette Hughes (30 coauthored works)

Their research has been featured predominantly in the following publication venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 62 publications
  • Environmental Science & Technology - 33 publications
  • Environmental Science & Technology Letters - 21 publications
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology - 9 publications
  • Environmental Science Water Research & Technology - 7 publications

Some recent papers by Alexandria B. Boehm include:

  • Wastewater-Based Epidemiology: Global Collaborative to Maximize Contributions in the Fight Against COVID-19, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater Settled Solids Is Associated with COVID-19 Cases in a Large Urban Sewershed, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Environmental DNA reveals seasonal shifts and potential interactions in a marine community, 2020, Nature Communications
  • The Environmental Microbiology Minimum Information (EMMI) Guidelines: qPCR and dPCR Quality and Reporting for Environmental Microbiology, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Wastewater concentrations of human influenza, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, and seasonal coronavirus nucleic-acids during the COVID-19 pandemic: a surveillance study, 2023, The Lancet Microbe

Best Publications

  • Rapid water disinfection using vertically aligned MoS2 nanofilms and visible light

    Chong Liu;Desheng Kong;Po Chun Hsu;Hongtao Yuan

  • Shifts in the relative abundance of ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria and archaea across physicochemical gradients in a subterranean estuary

    Alyson E. Santoro;Christopher A. Francis;Nicholas R. De Sieyes;Alexandria B. Boehm

  • Quantification of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Shedding and Decay Rates for Three Marine Fish.

    Lauren M. Sassoubre;Kevan M. Yamahara;Luke D. Gardner;Barbara A. Block

  • Wastewater-Based Epidemiology: Global Collaborative to Maximize Contributions in the Fight Against COVID-19.

    Aaron Bivins;Devin North;Arslan Ahmad;Warish Ahmed

  • Decadal and shorter period variability of surf zone water quality at Huntington Beach, California.

    Boehm Ab;Grant Sb;Kim Jh;Mowbray Sl

  • SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater Settled Solids Is Associated with COVID-19 Cases in a Large Urban Sewershed.

    Katherine E Graham;Stephanie K Loeb;Marlene K Wolfe;David Catoe

  • Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.

    Alexandria B. Boehm;Laurie C. Van De Werfhorst;John F. Griffith;Patricia A. Holden

  • Environmental DNA reveals seasonal shifts and potential interactions in a marine community

    Anni Djurhuus;Collin J. Closek;Ryan P. Kelly;Kathleen J. Pitz

  • Sunlight-mediated inactivation of health-relevant microorganisms in water: a review of mechanisms and modeling approaches

    Kara L. Nelson;Alexandria B. Boehm;Robert J. Davies-Colley;Michael C. Dodd

  • Biomonitoring of marine vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding.

    Elizabeth A. Andruszkiewicz;Hilary A. Starks;Francisco P. Chavez;Lauren M. Sassoubre

  • Wastewater-Based Detection of Two Influenza Outbreaks

    Unknown

  • Beach Sands along the California Coast Are Diffuse Sources of Fecal Bacteria to Coastal Waters

    Kevan M. Yamahara;Blythe A. Layton;and Alyson E. Santoro;Alexandria B. Boehm

  • The Environmental Microbiology Minimum Information (EMMI) Guidelines: qPCR and dPCR Quality and Reporting for Environmental Microbiology.

    Mark A Borchardt;Alexandria B Boehm;Marc Salit;Marc Salit;Susan K Spencer

  • Tiered Approach for Identification of a Human Fecal Pollution Source at a Recreational Beach: Case Study at Avalon Bay, Catalina Island, California

    Alexandria B Boehm;Jed A Fuhrman;Robert D Mrse;Stanley B Grant

  • Generation of enterococci bacteria in a coastal saltwater marsh and its impact on surf zone water quality.

    S B Grant;B F Sanders;A B Boehm;J A Redman

  • Scaling and management of fecal indicator bacteria in runoff from a coastal urban watershed in southern California.

    Ryan L. Reeves;Stanley B. Grant;Robert D. Mrse;Carmen M. Copil Oancea

  • A sea change ahead for recreational water quality criteria

    Alexandria B. Boehm;Nicholas J. Ashbolt;John M. Colford;Lee E. Dunbar

  • Denitrifier Community Composition along a Nitrate and Salinity Gradient in a Coastal Aquifer

    Alyson E. Santoro;Alexandria B. Boehm;Christopher A. Francis

  • Fecal Contamination and Diarrheal Pathogens on Surfaces and in Soils among Tanzanian Households with and without Improved Sanitation

    Amy J. Pickering;Timothy R. Julian;Sara J. Marks;Mia C. Mattioli

  • Engineered Infiltration Systems for Urban Stormwater Reclamation

    Janel E. Grebel;Janel E. Grebel;Sanjay K. Mohanty;Sanjay K. Mohanty;Andrew A. Torkelson;Andrew A. Torkelson;Alexandria B. Boehm;Alexandria B. Boehm

  • Persistence of nucleic acid markers of health-relevant organisms in seawater microcosms: implications for their use in assessing risk in recreational waters.

    Sarah P. Walters;Kevan M. Yamahara;Alexandria B. Boehm

  • Growth of Enterococci in Unaltered, Unseeded Beach Sands Subjected to Tidal Wetting

    Kevan M. Yamahara;Sarah P. Walters;Alexandria B. Boehm

Frequent Co-Authors

Orin C. Shanks
Orin C. Shanks Environmental Protection Agency
Kara L. Nelson
Kara L. Nelson University of California, Berkeley
Stephen B. Weisberg
Stephen B. Weisberg Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Adina Paytan
Adina Paytan University of California, Santa Cruz
Helena M. Solo-Gabriele
Helena M. Solo-Gabriele University of Miami
Thomas A. Edge
Thomas A. Edge Environment and Climate Change Canada
Stanley B. Grant
Stanley B. Grant Virginia Tech
Michael J. Sadowsky
Michael J. Sadowsky University of Minnesota
Rachel T. Noble
Rachel T. Noble University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Stefan Wuertz
Stefan Wuertz Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Professionals often combine environmental knowledge with technical skills like Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to analyze spatial data and address real-world ecological challenges. For those interested in this focus, exploring the best gis schools can enhance your expertise and employability.

Leadership and policy also play vital roles in environmental work. Pursuing programs like the best online masters in public administration equips students with skills to influence environmental policy and community management, blending science with governance.

Understanding societal impacts and human behavior is crucial in environmental advocacy and sustainability efforts. Online options such as a bachelors degree in sociology online provide foundational insights into social systems relevant to environmental change.

For professionals aiming to advance research or leadership roles without the extensive commitment of a traditional dissertation, doctoral programs online no dissertation offer flexible pathways to doctoral qualifications, making higher education more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Alexandria B. Boehm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles