World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
29361
World Ranking
18990
National Ranking
9465

Lloyd M. Taylor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lloyd M. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 220 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lloyd M. Taylor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lloyd M. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lloyd M. Taylor is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions to subfields such as Genetics, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Gastroenterology.

The scientist's work focuses on several key topics related to digestive and inflammatory conditions. These include:

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Microscopic Colitis
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
  • Gastrointestinal motility and disorders

Recent publications demonstrate ongoing engagement with gastrointestinal research, particularly in relation to Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Notable papers are:

  • "A18 DIETARY PREDICTORS OF BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY IN CROHN'S DISEASE: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY," 2021, Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
  • "A47 A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE CROHN'S DISEASE THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION TRIAL (CD-TDI) IN MILD-TO-MODERATE CROHN'S DISEASE," 2024, Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
  • "A182 EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN SPECIFIC MICROBIAL STRAINS AND ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS," 2024, Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology

These publications were all featured in the Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, which is the primary venue for their scholarly articles to date.

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Taylor's research output. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Subrata Ghosh
  • Natasha Haskey
  • Christina Ohland
  • Kathy D. McCoy
  • Maitreyi Raman

The partnerships suggest a multidisciplinary approach encompassing clinical and molecular research perspectives within their areas of study.

Best Publications

  • ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic)

    Alan T. Hirsch;Ziv J. Haskal;Norman R. Hertzer;Curtis W. Bakal

  • ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (Lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): Executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vas

    A. T. Hirsch;Z. J. Haskal;N. R. Hertzer;C. W. Bakal

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Arterial Insufficiency of the Lower Extremities: A Critical Review

    Weitz Ji;Byrne J;Clagett Gp;Farkouh Me

  • Prevalence of hyperhomocyst(e)inemia in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

    M. R. Malinow;S. S. Kang;L. M. Taylor;P. W. K. Wong

  • Functional decline in peripheral arterial disease: associations with the ankle brachial index and leg symptoms.

    Mary Mc Grae McDermott;Kiang Liu;Philip Greenland;Jack M. Guralnik

  • ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic)

    Alan T. Hirsch;Ziv J. Haskal;Norman R. Hertzer;Curtis W. Bakal

  • The Ankle Brachial Index Is Associated with Leg Function and Physical Activity: The Walking and Leg Circulation Study

    Mary McGrae McDermott;Philip Greenland;Kiang Liu;Jack M. Guralnik

  • Rapid HPLC determination of total homocysteine and other thiols in serum and plasma: sex differences and correlation with cobalamin and folate concentrations in healthy subjects.

    Donald W. Jacobsen;Vytenis J. Gatautis;Ralph Green;Killian Robinson

  • Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning

    Gregory L. Moneta;James M. Edwards;Richard W. Chitwood;Lloyd M. Taylor

  • Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: Five-year results of a modern series

    Lloyd M Taylor;James M. Edwards;John M. Porter

  • Fifteen-year results of ambulatory compression therapy for chronic venous ulcers.

    Mayberry Jc;Moneta Gl;Taylor Lm;Porter Jm

  • Recommended indications for operative treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Larry H. Hollier;Lloyd M. Taylor;John Ochsner

  • The association of elevated plasma homocyst(e)ine with progression of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease

    Lloyd M. Taylor;Robert D. DeFrang;E.John Harris;John M. Porter

  • Mesenteric duplex scanning: A blinded prospective study ☆ ☆☆

    Gregory L. Moneta;Raymond W. Lee;Richard A. Yeager;Lloyd M. Taylor

  • Common Mutation in Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Correlation With Homocysteine Metabolism and Late-Onset Vascular Disease

    Thomas G. Deloughery;Adam Evans;Abbas Sadeghi;Jeffrey Mcwilliams

  • Statin Use and Leg Functioning in Patients With and Without Lower-Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease

    Mary Mc Grae McDermott;Jack M. Guralnik;Philip Greenland;William H. Pearce

  • Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: Duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis

    Gregory L. Moneta;James M. Edwards;George Papanicolaou;Thomas Hatsukami

  • Prospective blinded study of the relationship between plasma homocysteine and progression of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease

    Lloyd M. Taylor;Gregory L. Moneta;Gary J. Sexton;Robert A. Schuff

  • Surgical treatment of infected aortic aneurysm

    Gregory L. Moneta;Lloyd M. Taylor;Richard A. Yeager;James M. Edwards

  • Long-term hemodynamic and clinical sequelae of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

    Daniel J. Lindner;James M. Edwards;Edward S. Phinney;Lloyd M. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Porter
John M. Porter Oregon Health & Science University
Gregory L. Moneta
Gregory L. Moneta Oregon Health & Science University
William H. Pearce
William H. Pearce Northwestern University
Ronald L. Dalman
Ronald L. Dalman Stanford University
Michael H. Criqui
Michael H. Criqui University of California, San Diego
Philip Greenland
Philip Greenland Northwestern University
Kiang Liu
Kiang Liu Northwestern University
Mary M. McDermott
Mary M. McDermott Northwestern University
Jack M. Guralnik
Jack M. Guralnik University of Maryland, Baltimore
David Green
David Green Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens the door to numerous related pathways—many of which are available online and can be great stepping-stones. Students looking for advanced practical nursing roles often consider dnp programs online, which are designed for those wanting to achieve the highest level of nursing practice without sacrificing schedule flexibility.

Cost is a significant consideration for many learners. Fortunately, there are options for cheapest online dnp programs that make advanced degrees more accessible while maintaining quality education standards.

Aspiring nurses eager to begin working quickly might consider an lpn accelerated program. These programs are tailored for those who want to enter the healthcare field in less time.

The mental health field also offers in-demand roles, such as nurse practitioners specializing in psychiatric care. The online msn pmhnp programs enable registered nurses to build expertise in mental health, often at an accelerated pace and from the convenience of home.

Whether you want to fast-track your nursing education or pursue specialized advanced practice, online programs can provide flexible, affordable options to launch or elevate your medical career.

Best Scientists Citing Lloyd M. Taylor

Recently Published Articles