World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
21837
World Ranking
18425
National Ranking
9192

William H. Pearce publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Pearce sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 334 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William H. Pearce D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Pearce sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William H. Pearce is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a focus on the intersection of economics and medicine.

The main fields of study addressed in Pearce's work include:

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • Medicine

Subfields of particular emphasis are:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

The scientific topics covered in Pearce's research highlight areas such as:

  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy

One recent paper authored or co-authored by Pearce is titled "Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors in Prospective Retina-Focused Clinical Trial Screening and Enrollment", published in the Journal of Personalized Medicine in 2023. This paper, which received citations, explores variables impacting clinical trial participation specifically for retina-focused medical studies.

Frequent collaborators in Pearce's research include:

  • J. Cao
  • Sagar B. Patel
  • Calvin W. Wong
  • David O. Garcia
  • José Muñóz

The Journal of Personalized Medicine is a notable venue for Pearce's recent scholarly publications.

Best Publications

  • Leg symptoms in peripheral arterial disease: associated clinical characteristics and functional impairment.

    Mary Mc Grae McDermott;Philip Greenland;Kiang Liu;Jack M. Guralnik

  • Functional decline in peripheral arterial disease: associations with the ankle brachial index and leg symptoms.

    Mary Mc Grae McDermott;Kiang Liu;Philip Greenland;Jack M. Guralnik

  • The Ankle Brachial Index Is Associated with Leg Function and Physical Activity: The Walking and Leg Circulation Study

    Mary McGrae McDermott;Philip Greenland;Kiang Liu;Jack M. Guralnik

  • Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

    Sandra Carr;Andrew Farb;William H. Pearce;Renu Virmani

  • Treadmill Exercise and Resistance Training in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease With and Without Intermittent Claudication: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Mary M. McDermott;Philip Ades;Jack M. Guralnik;Alan Dyer

  • Clinical Applications of Blood-Derived and Marrow-Derived Stem Cells for Nonmalignant Diseases

    Richard K. Burt;Yvonne Loh;William Pearce;Nirat Beohar

  • Prolonged administration of doxycycline in patients with small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: report of a prospective (Phase II) multicenter study.

    B.Timothy Baxter;William H. Pearce;Eugene A. Waltke;Fred N. Littooy

  • Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in aneurysms and normal aorta

    Natalia A Tamarina;William D McMillan;Vera P Shively;William H Pearce

  • The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures

    William H. Pearce;Michele A. Parker;Joe Feinglass;Michael Ujiki

  • Lower ankle/brachial index, as calculated by averaging the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arterial pressures, and association with leg functioning in peripheral arterial disease

    Mary Mc Grae McDermott;Michael H. Criqui;Michael H. Criqui;Kiang Liu;Jack M. Guralnik

  • Current management of visceral artery aneurysms.

    Sandra C. Carr;William H. Pearce;Robert L. Vogelzang;Walter J. McCarthy

  • Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A multidisciplinary research program supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute******

    Momtaz Wassef;B. Timothy Baxter;Rex L. Chisholm;Ronald L. Dalman

  • Enhanced production of the chemotactic cytokines interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human abdominal aortic aneurysms.

    A. E. Koch;S. L. Kunkel;S. L. Kunkel;W. H. Pearce;M. R. Shah

  • Carotid stenting and angioplasty: A statement for healthcare professionals from the councils on cardiovascular radiology, stroke, cardio- thoracic and vascular surgery, epidemiology and prevention, and clinical cardiology, American Heart Association

    Michael A. Bettmann;Barry T. Katzen;Jack Whisnant;Michael Brant-Zawadzki

  • Size matters: The relationship between MMP-9 expression and aortic diameter

    William D. McMillan;Natalia A. Tamarina;Maria Cipollone;David A. Johnson

  • Statin Use and Leg Functioning in Patients With and Without Lower-Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease

    Mary Mc Grae McDermott;Jack M. Guralnik;Philip Greenland;William H. Pearce

  • Mesenteric venous thrombosis: A changing clinical entity****

    Mark D. Morasch;James L. Ebaugh;Andy C. Chiou;Jon S. Matsumura

  • Increased plasma levels of metalloproteinase-9 are associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms

    William D. McMillan;William H. Pearce

  • In Situ Localization and Quantification of mRNA for 92-kD Type IV Collagenase and Its Inhibitor in Aneurysmal, Occlusive, and Normal Aorta

    William D. McMillan;Bruce K. Patterson;Richard R. Keen;Vera P. Shively

  • Functional decline in peripheral arterial disease: Associations with the ankle-brachial index and leg symptoms☆

    M.M. McDermott;K. Liu;P. Greenland

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary M. McDermott
Mary M. McDermott Northwestern University
Michael H. Criqui
Michael H. Criqui University of California, San Diego
Kiang Liu
Kiang Liu Northwestern University
Jack M. Guralnik
Jack M. Guralnik University of Maryland, Baltimore
Philip Greenland
Philip Greenland Northwestern University
Luigi Ferrucci
Luigi Ferrucci National Institutes of Health
David Green
David Green Northwestern University
Lloyd M. Taylor
Lloyd M. Taylor Oregon Health & Science University
Paul M. Ridker
Paul M. Ridker Brigham and Women's Hospital
Leena Sharma
Leena Sharma Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in the medical field but looking for flexible, affordable education options? Online degrees and specialized certifications offer excellent pathways for entering healthcare roles beyond traditional medical school.

Fields like health information technology online degree studies are growing rapidly, providing critical support to hospitals and medical practices. These programs typically cover topics such as medical records management, data security, and healthcare law, making graduates highly employable in administrative roles.

Another in-demand field is medical billing and coding. Earning a certificate can be achieved quickly and at an affordable price. Exploring medical coding certification cost can help you assess the investment required to start this career, which is essential for healthcare facilities to process insurance claims efficiently.

For those interested in direct patient care, there are numerous affordable online nursing and nurse practitioner programs. The cheapest online np programs and cheapest online nursing program options allow aspiring nurses and advanced practice providers to balance work and study while preparing for high-demand roles.

Exploring these online pathways can open doors to rewarding healthcare careers with flexible and budget-friendly learning options.

Best Scientists Citing William H. Pearce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles