World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
26633
World Ranking
16043
National Ranking
8074

John M. Porter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Porter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 386 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John M. Porter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Porter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Porter is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, including Medicine and Environmental Science, with a particular focus on subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Neurology, Ecology, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies

John M. Porter has published extensively in several venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Neurocritical Care
  • Critical Care
  • Journal of Surgical Research
  • Scientific Data

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Porter include:

  • Extubation in neurocritical care patients: the ENIO international prospective study (2022), Intensive Care Medicine
  • Clinical practice and effect of carbon dioxide on outcomes in mechanically ventilated acute brain-injured patients: a secondary analysis of the ENIO study (2024), Intensive Care Medicine
  • Aerial surveys of waterbirds in Australia (2020), Scientific Data
  • Individualized Thresholds of Hypoxemia and Hyperoxemia and their Effect on Outcome in Acute Brain Injured Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the ENIO Study (2023), Neurocritical Care
  • Utilization of mechanical power and associations with clinical outcomes in brain injured patients: a secondary analysis of the extubation strategies in neuro-intensive care unit patients and associations with outcome (ENIO) trial (2023), Critical Care

Throughout their career, Porter has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Chiara Robba
  • Denise Battaglini
  • Giuseppe Citerio
  • Mohammed A. Azab
  • Olivier Huet

Best Publications

  • Reporting standards in venous disease: An update

    John M. Porter;Gregory L. Moneta

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Arterial Insufficiency of the Lower Extremities: A Critical Review

    Weitz Ji;Byrne J;Clagett Gp;Farkouh Me

  • Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning

    Gregory L. Moneta;James M. Edwards;Richard W. Chitwood;Lloyd M. Taylor

  • Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: Five-year results of a modern series

    Lloyd M Taylor;James M. Edwards;John M. Porter

  • Pentoxifylline efficacy in the treatment of intermittent claudication: multicenter controlled double-blind trial with objective assessment of chronic occlusive arterial disease patients.

    John M Porter;Bruce S Cutler;Bok Y Lee;Theobald Reich

  • Reporting standards in venous disease

    John M. Porter;Robert B. Rutherford;G.Patrick Clagett;John J. Cranley

  • Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs. A consensus statement

    Hugh G. Beebe;John J. Bergan;David Bergqvist;Bo Eklof

  • Fifteen-year results of ambulatory compression therapy for chronic venous ulcers.

    Mayberry Jc;Moneta Gl;Taylor Lm;Porter Jm

  • The association of elevated plasma homocyst(e)ine with progression of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease

    Lloyd M. Taylor;Robert D. DeFrang;E.John Harris;John M. Porter

  • Mesenteric duplex scanning: A blinded prospective study ☆ ☆☆

    Gregory L. Moneta;Raymond W. Lee;Richard A. Yeager;Lloyd M. Taylor

  • Aerobic fitness in patients with fibrositis. A controlled study of respiratory gas exchange and 133xenon clearance from exercising muscle

    R M Bennett;S R Clark;L Goldberg;D Nelson

  • Accuracy of lower extremity arterial duplex mapping

    Gregory L. Moneta;Richard A. Yeager;Ruza Antonovic;Lee D. Hall

  • Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: Duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis

    Gregory L. Moneta;James M. Edwards;George Papanicolaou;Thomas Hatsukami

  • Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs : a consensus statement

    H. G. Beebe;J. J. Bergan;D. Bergqvist;B. Eklof

  • Duplex ultrasound criteria for diagnosis of splanchnic artery stenosis or occlusion

    Gregory L. Moneta;Richard A. Yeager;Ronald Dalman;Ruza Antonovic

  • Prospective blinded study of the relationship between plasma homocysteine and progression of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease

    Lloyd M. Taylor;Gregory L. Moneta;Gary J. Sexton;Robert A. Schuff

  • Surgical treatment of infected aortic aneurysm

    Gregory L. Moneta;Lloyd M. Taylor;Richard A. Yeager;James M. Edwards

  • Long-term hemodynamic and clinical sequelae of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

    Daniel J. Lindner;James M. Edwards;Edward S. Phinney;Lloyd M. Taylor

  • Patient recovery after infrainguinal bypass grafting for limb salvage

    Alexander D. Nicoloff;Lloyd M. Taylor;Robert B. McLafferty;Gregory L. Moneta

  • Hypothenar hammer syndrome: Proposed etiology

    Brian L. Ferris;Lloyd M. Taylor;Karen Oyama;Robert B. McLafferty

Frequent Co-Authors

Lloyd M. Taylor
Lloyd M. Taylor Oregon Health & Science University
Gregory L. Moneta
Gregory L. Moneta Oregon Health & Science University
Ronald L. Dalman
Ronald L. Dalman Stanford University
John J. Bergan
John J. Bergan University of California, San Diego
Thomas F. O'Donnell
Thomas F. O'Donnell Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lazar J. Greenfield
Lazar J. Greenfield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert W. Hobson
Robert W. Hobson Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Robert M. Bennett
Robert M. Bennett Oregon Health & Science University
Andrew N. Nicolaides
Andrew N. Nicolaides Imperial College London
David Bergqvist
David Bergqvist Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to numerous related fields and alternative career pathways. Many students consider online health degree programs for their flexibility, affordability, and accessibility. For those interested in nursing, there are cheap online nursing programs that provide quality education without breaking the bank.

Nurses aiming to advance their qualifications can explore phd in nursing online programs, which allow professionals to combine research and practice at the highest academic level. If you already have an RN license and want to expand your role, consider the cheapest rn to bsn online options to boost your credentials and career opportunities.

Even non-nursing majors can quickly transition into the healthcare field through online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors. These programs are tailored for students seeking accelerated pathways to advanced nursing roles. No matter your background, online degrees can help you find a rewarding career in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Porter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles