World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
32350
World Ranking
8973
National Ranking
4618

James M. Ford publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Ford sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 402 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James M. Ford D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Ford sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James M. Ford is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields related to medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong focus on oncology.

Areas of study prominently addressed in their research include:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research
  • Genetics
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

The main research topics covered by James M. Ford are:

  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Frequent publication venues for Ford include:

  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Nature Cancer
  • Clinical Cancer Research

James M. Ford has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • Meredith Mills
  • M Snyder
  • Uri Ladabaum
  • Edward D. Esplin
  • Allison W. Kurian

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Ford include:

  • The Human Tumor Atlas Network: Charting Tumor Transitions across Space and Time at Single-Cell Resolution (2020, Cell)
  • Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical practice guidelines (2020, The Lancet Oncology)
  • Overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer (2022, Annals of Oncology)
  • Single-cell analyses define a continuum of cell state and composition changes in the malignant transformation of polyps to colorectal cancer (2022, Nature Genetics)
  • Tucatinib plus trastuzumab for chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer (MOUNTAINEER): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study (2023, The Lancet Oncology)

Best Publications

  • Pharmacology of drugs that alter multidrug resistance in cancer.

    J M Ford;W N Hait

  • Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

    Melinda L. Telli;Kirsten M. Timms;Julia Reid;Bryan Hennessy

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility

    Mark E. Robson;Mark E. Robson;Angela R. Bradbury;Banu K Arun;Susan M. Domchek

  • Expression of the p48 xeroderma pigmentosum gene is p53-dependent and is involved in global genomic repair

    Byung Joon Hwang;James M. Ford;Philip C. Hanawalt;Gilbert Chu

  • Single Cell Profiling of Circulating Tumor Cells: Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Diversity from Breast Cancer Cell Lines

    Ashley A. Powell;AmirAli H. Talasaz;Haiyu Zhang;Marc A. Coram

  • Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical guidelines with an emphasis on germline CDH1 mutation carriers.

    Rachel S van der Post;Ingrid P Vogelaar;Fátima Carneiro;Parry Guilford

  • p53-mediated DNA repair responses to UV radiation: studies of mouse cells lacking p53, p21, and/or gadd45 genes.

    Martin L. Smith;James M. Ford;M. Christine Hollander;Rachel A. Bortnick

  • The Human Tumor Atlas Network: Charting Tumor Transitions Across Space and Time at Single-Cell Resolution

    Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen;Aviv Regev;Aviv Regev;Aviv Regev;Philipp Oberdoerffer;Tal Nawy

  • Clinical Interpretation and Implications of Whole-Genome Sequencing

    Frederick E. Dewey;Megan E. Grove;Cuiping Pan;Benjamin A. Goldstein

  • Phase I study of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

    Albert C Koong;Quynh T Le;Anthony Ho;Bryan Fong

  • Clinical Evaluation of a Multiple-Gene Sequencing Panel for Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment

    Allison W. Kurian;Emily E. Hare;Meredith A. Mills;Kerry E. Kingham

  • Founder and Recurrent CDH1 Mutations in Families With Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer

    Pardeep Kaurah;Andrée MacMillan;Niki Boyd;Janine Senz

  • Germline E-cadherin mutations in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: assessment of 42 new families and review of genetic screening criteria

    A R Brooks-Wilson;P Kaurah;G Suriano;S Leach

  • Li-Fraumeni syndrome fibroblasts homozygous for p53 mutations are deficient in global DNA repair but exhibit normal transcription-coupled repair and enhanced UV resistance

    James M. Ford;Philip C. Hanawalt

  • Expression of Wild-type p53 Is Required for Efficient Global Genomic Nucleotide Excision Repair in UV-irradiated Human Fibroblasts

    James M. Ford;Philip C. Hanawalt

  • Stereotactic radiotherapy for unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

    Daniel T. Chang;Devin Schellenberg;John Shen;Jeff Kim

  • p53 and DNA damage-inducible expression of the xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene.

    Shanthi Adimoolam;James M. Ford

  • Phase II study to assess the efficacy of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy followed by a stereotactic radiosurgery boost in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

    Albert C. Koong;Erin Christofferson;Quynh Thu Le;Karyn A. Goodman

  • Xeroderma pigmentosum p48 gene enhances global genomic repair and suppresses UV-induced mutagenesis.

    Jean Y Tang;Byung Joon Hwang;James M Ford;Philip C Hanawalt

  • Founder and Recurrent CDH1 mutations in families with Hereditary diffuse gastric Cancer. Editorial

    Pardeep Kaurah;Andrée Macmillan;Niki Boyd;Janine Senz

Frequent Co-Authors

Allison W. Kurian
Allison W. Kurian Stanford University
Jeffrey A. Norton
Jeffrey A. Norton Stanford University
Albert C. Koong
Albert C. Koong The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Stephen B. Gruber
Stephen B. Gruber City Of Hope National Medical Center
Teri A. Longacre
Teri A. Longacre Stanford University
Dee W. West
Dee W. West Stanford University
Judy Garber
Judy Garber Harvard University
Philip C. Hanawalt
Philip C. Hanawalt Stanford University
Mark E. Robson
Mark E. Robson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael Snyder
Michael Snyder Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA can open doors to a wide variety of online degrees and healthcare careers. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, enrolling in a online medical coding classes with financial aid can be an affordable way to start working in medical billing and coding roles, which are in high demand across hospitals and clinics.

Nursing offers flexible options too. Many prospective students wonder: do you have to take a teas test for lpn? Fortunately, some nursing schools waive this requirement, helping you streamline your path to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN).

For those drawn to healthcare leadership, pursuing a healthcare administration associate degree online offers a fast-track into management positions overseeing medical facilities and patient care systems. Registered nurses hoping to advance further might consider adn to fnp bridge programs, which allow RNs with an associate degree to transition efficiently to roles as Family Nurse Practitioners.

With these flexible study options and career pathways, a fulfilling future in healthcare may be more accessible than ever—whether you're beginning your journey or looking to advance your credentials online.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Ford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles