World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Physics 100 1649 1569 139 131 361 36942

Lance Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lance Miller between 1984 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lance Miller published across 38 years, from 1984 to 2021, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2005. 14 of the 362 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2005. 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 10 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 43 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications
1984 2021

362 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lance Miller: publications per year, 1984 to 2021
Year Publications
1984 3
1985 3
1986 4
1987 1
1988 3
1989 3
1990 2
1991 4
1992 3
1993 5
1994 4
1995 4
1996 2
1997 1
1998 10
1999 14
2000 5
2001 18
2002 14
2003 13
2004 19
2005 43
2006 9
2007 11
2008 13
2009 8
2010 12
2011 11
2012 16
2013 20
2014 12
2015 21
2016 9
2017 14
2018 9
2019 5
2020 7
2021 7
Total 362
Download as CSV

Lance Miller publication distribution in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Physics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lance Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 70 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 103–122 to 1,469+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 323–342 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 343–362 publications, is where this scientist sits. 103–122 publications: 7 scientists 123–142 publications: 10 scientists 143–162 publications: 31 scientists 163–182 publications: 35 scientists 183–202 publications: 53 scientists 203–222 publications: 81 scientists 223–242 publications: 85 scientists 243–262 publications: 112 scientists 263–282 publications: 114 scientists 283–302 publications: 126 scientists 303–322 publications: 136 scientists 323–342 publications: 162 scientists 343–362 publications: 155 scientists 363–382 publications: 156 scientists 383–402 publications: 134 scientists 403–422 publications: 145 scientists 423–442 publications: 147 scientists 443–462 publications: 131 scientists 463–482 publications: 131 scientists 483–502 publications: 116 scientists 503–522 publications: 106 scientists 523–542 publications: 103 scientists 543–562 publications: 87 scientists 563–582 publications: 84 scientists 583–602 publications: 94 scientists 603–622 publications: 70 scientists 623–642 publications: 76 scientists 643–662 publications: 60 scientists 663–682 publications: 54 scientists 683–702 publications: 60 scientists 703–722 publications: 48 scientists 723–742 publications: 64 scientists 743–762 publications: 48 scientists 763–782 publications: 37 scientists 783–802 publications: 43 scientists 803–822 publications: 34 scientists 823–842 publications: 36 scientists 843–862 publications: 32 scientists 863–882 publications: 32 scientists 883–902 publications: 31 scientists 903–922 publications: 25 scientists 923–942 publications: 15 scientists 943–962 publications: 24 scientists 963–982 publications: 13 scientists 983–1,002 publications: 21 scientists 1,003–1,022 publications: 21 scientists 1,023–1,042 publications: 16 scientists 1,043–1,062 publications: 9 scientists 1,063–1,082 publications: 19 scientists 1,083–1,102 publications: 11 scientists 1,103–1,122 publications: 17 scientists 1,123–1,142 publications: 11 scientists 1,143–1,162 publications: 7 scientists 1,163–1,182 publications: 4 scientists 1,183–1,202 publications: 10 scientists 1,203–1,222 publications: 8 scientists 1,223–1,242 publications: 16 scientists 1,243–1,262 publications: 4 scientists 1,263–1,282 publications: 10 scientists 1,283–1,302 publications: 5 scientists 1,303–1,322 publications: 7 scientists 1,323–1,342 publications: 4 scientists 1,343–1,362 publications: 8 scientists 1,363–1,382 publications: 6 scientists 1,383–1,402 publications: 7 scientists 1,403–1,422 publications: 3 scientists 1,423–1,442 publications: 4 scientists 1,443–1,462 publications: 4 scientists 1,463–1,468 publications: 3 scientists 1,469+ publications: 100 scientists
103–122 publications 1,469+

This scientist: 361 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Physics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,678 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
103–122 7
123–142 10
143–162 31
163–182 35
183–202 53
203–222 81
223–242 85
243–262 112
263–282 114
283–302 126
303–322 136
323–342 162
343–362 155 361
363–382 156
383–402 134
403–422 145
423–442 147
443–462 131
463–482 131
483–502 116
503–522 106
523–542 103
543–562 87
563–582 84
583–602 94
603–622 70
623–642 76
643–662 60
663–682 54
683–702 60
703–722 48
723–742 64
743–762 48
763–782 37
783–802 43
803–822 34
823–842 36
843–862 32
863–882 32
883–902 31
903–922 25
923–942 15
943–962 24
963–982 13
983–1,002 21
1,003–1,022 21
1,023–1,042 16
1,043–1,062 9
1,063–1,082 19
1,083–1,102 11
1,103–1,122 17
1,123–1,142 11
1,143–1,162 7
1,163–1,182 4
1,183–1,202 10
1,203–1,222 8
1,223–1,242 16
1,243–1,262 4
1,263–1,282 10
1,283–1,302 5
1,303–1,322 7
1,323–1,342 4
1,343–1,362 8
1,363–1,382 6
1,383–1,402 7
1,403–1,422 3
1,423–1,442 4
1,443–1,462 4
1,463–1,468 3
1,469+ 100
Download as CSV

Lance Miller D-index placement in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Physics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lance Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 59 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 185+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 167. Most scientists, 167, have 80–81 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 76 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 110 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 143 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 153 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 144 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 167 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 167 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 166 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 132 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 155 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 134 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 137 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 102 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 112 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 110 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 116 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 97 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 103 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 87 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 90 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 78 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 75 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 67 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 69 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 59 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 53 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 42 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 41 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 33 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 32 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 45 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 19 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 24 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 28 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 31 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 20 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 12 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 24 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 23 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 15 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 15 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 11 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 17 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 12 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 11 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 9 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 9 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 11 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 4 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 8 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 5 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 3 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 4 scientists 184 D-Index: 4 scientists 185+ D-Index: 99 scientists
70–71 D-Index 185+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Physics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,678 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 76
72–73 110
74–75 143
76–77 153
78–79 144
80–81 167
82–83 167
84–85 166
86–87 132
88–89 155
90–91 134
92–93 137
94–95 102
96–97 112
98–99 110
100–101 116 100
102–103 97
104–105 103
106–107 87
108–109 90
110–111 67
112–113 78
114–115 75
116–117 67
118–119 69
120–121 60
122–123 59
124–125 53
126–127 42
128–129 41
130–131 33
132–133 32
134–135 45
136–137 19
138–139 24
140–141 28
142–143 31
144–145 22
146–147 20
148–149 12
150–151 16
152–153 24
154–155 23
156–157 15
158–159 15
160–161 11
162–163 17
164–165 12
166–167 11
168–169 9
170–171 9
172–173 11
174–175 4
176–177 8
178–179 5
180–181 3
182–183 4
184 4
185+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Lance Miller is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile reflects a professional engaged in research and scholarship within this institution.

Details on recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not available, which limits insight into specific research outputs or collaboration networks.

There is no documented information on book publications by this researcher, indicating a focus that may be oriented more towards articles, conference papers, or other scholarly outputs.

Similarly, there are no listed main fields of study, subfields, or specific topics of research that could provide a precise outline of Lance Miller's academic interests or areas of specialization.

No awards or honors have been noted, which means there is no public record of formal recognition in the scope provided.

Best Publications

  • Euclid Definition Study Report

    R. Laureijs;J. Amiaux;S. Arduini;J.-L. Auguères

  • Measurement of the J/ψ meson and b-hadron production cross sections in pp̄ collisions at √s = 1960 GeV

    D. Acosta;J. Adelman;T. Affolder;T. Akimoto

  • Observation of the narrow state X(3872) → J/ψπ+π- in p̄p collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV

    D. Acosta;T. Affolder;M. H. Ahn;M. H. Ahn;M. H. Ahn;T. Akimoto

  • KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing

    H. Hildebrandt;Massimo Viola;Catherine Heymans;S. Joudaki

  • The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey – XII. The spectroscopic catalogue and luminosity function

    S. M. Croom;R. J. Smith;B. J. Boyle;T. Shanks

  • The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - I. The Optical QSO Luminosity Function

    B. J. Boyle;T. Shanks;S. M. Croom;R. J. Smith

  • CFHTLenS: the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey

    Catherine Heymans;Ludovic Van Waerbeke;Lance Miller;Thomas Erben

  • CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing cosmological parameter constraints: Mitigating the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignments

    Catherine Heymans;Emma Grocutt;Alan Heavens;Martin Kilbinger

  • The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey — I. The optical luminosity function of quasi-stellar objects

    Brian John Boyle;Tom Shanks;Scott Croom;R Smith

  • KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints

    Catherine Heymans;Catherine Heymans;Tilman Tröster;Marika Asgari;Chris Blake

  • Measurement of the J/psi meson and b-hadron production cross sections in p(p)over-bar collisions at root s=1960 GeV RID C-1693-2008 RID G-1087-2011 RID E-4473-2011

    D. Acosta;J. Adelman;T. Affolder;T. Akimoto

  • The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function

    Scott M. Croom;B. J. Boyle;T. Shanks;R. J. Smith

  • CFHTLenS: the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey – imaging data and catalogue products

    T. Erben;H. Hildebrandt;H. Hildebrandt;L. Miller;L. van Waerbeke

  • Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys – III. Application to the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey

    L. Miller;C. Heymans;T. D. Kitching;L. van Waerbeke

  • A semi-empirical simulation of the extragalactic radio continuum sky for next generation radio telescopes

    R.J. Wilman;L. Miller;M.J. Jarvis;T. Mauch

  • The Kilo-Degree Survey

    J. T. A. de Jong;K. Kuijken;D. Applegate;K. Begeman

  • CFHTLenS: combined probe cosmological model comparison using 2D weak gravitational lensing

    Martin Kilbinger;Liping Fu;Catherine Heymans;Fergus Simpson

  • Gravitational lensing analysis of the Kilo-Degree Survey

    Konrad Kuijken;Catherine Heymans;Hendrik Hildebrandt;Reiko Nakajima

  • The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO survey: QSO clustering and the L-z degeneracy

    J. DaÂngela;T. Shanks;S. M. Croom;P. Weilbacher

  • KiDS-1000 Cosmology : Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics

    Marika Asgari;Chieh-An Lin;Benjamin Joachimi;Benjamin Giblin

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott M. Croom
Scott M. Croom University of Sydney
Tom Shanks
Tom Shanks Durham University
James Reeves
James Reeves University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Catherine Heymans
Catherine Heymans University of Edinburgh
T. J. Turner
T. J. Turner University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Henk Hoekstra
Henk Hoekstra Leiden University
Konrad Kuijken
Konrad Kuijken Leiden University
William Trischuk
William Trischuk University of Toronto
Michael J. Hudson
Michael J. Hudson University of Waterloo
Steven B. Kraemer
Steven B. Kraemer Catholic University of America

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Lance Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles