World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Physics

D-Index
109
Citations
40663
World Ranking
1218
National Ranking
30

Scott M. Croom publication distribution in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Physics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Croom sits on this spectrum.

103–122 publications: 7 scientists 123–142 publications: 10 scientists 143–162 publications: 31 scientists 163–182 publications: 35 scientists 183–202 publications: 53 scientists 203–222 publications: 81 scientists 223–242 publications: 85 scientists 243–262 publications: 112 scientists 263–282 publications: 114 scientists 283–302 publications: 126 scientists 303–322 publications: 136 scientists 323–342 publications: 162 scientists 343–362 publications: 155 scientists 363–382 publications: 156 scientists 383–402 publications: 134 scientists 403–422 publications: 145 scientists 423–442 publications: 147 scientists 443–462 publications: 131 scientists 463–482 publications: 131 scientists 483–502 publications: 116 scientists 503–522 publications: 106 scientists 523–542 publications: 103 scientists 543–562 publications: 87 scientists 563–582 publications: 84 scientists 583–602 publications: 94 scientists 603–622 publications: 70 scientists 623–642 publications: 76 scientists 643–662 publications: 60 scientists 663–682 publications: 54 scientists 683–702 publications: 60 scientists 703–722 publications: 48 scientists 723–742 publications: 64 scientists 743–762 publications: 48 scientists 763–782 publications: 37 scientists 783–802 publications: 43 scientists 803–822 publications: 34 scientists 823–842 publications: 36 scientists 843–862 publications: 32 scientists 863–882 publications: 32 scientists 883–902 publications: 31 scientists 903–922 publications: 25 scientists 923–942 publications: 15 scientists 943–962 publications: 24 scientists 963–982 publications: 13 scientists 983–1,002 publications: 21 scientists 1,003–1,022 publications: 21 scientists 1,023–1,042 publications: 16 scientists 1,043–1,062 publications: 9 scientists 1,063–1,082 publications: 19 scientists 1,083–1,102 publications: 11 scientists 1,103–1,122 publications: 17 scientists 1,123–1,142 publications: 11 scientists 1,143–1,162 publications: 7 scientists 1,163–1,182 publications: 4 scientists 1,183–1,202 publications: 10 scientists 1,203–1,222 publications: 8 scientists 1,223–1,242 publications: 16 scientists 1,243–1,262 publications: 4 scientists 1,263–1,282 publications: 10 scientists 1,283–1,302 publications: 5 scientists 1,303–1,322 publications: 7 scientists 1,323–1,342 publications: 4 scientists 1,343–1,362 publications: 8 scientists 1,363–1,382 publications: 6 scientists 1,383–1,402 publications: 7 scientists 1,403–1,422 publications: 3 scientists 1,423–1,442 publications: 4 scientists 1,443–1,462 publications: 4 scientists 1,463–1,468 publications: 3 scientists 1,469+ publications: 100 scientists
103 publications 1,469+

This scientist: 479 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more.

Scott M. Croom D-index placement in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Physics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Croom sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 76 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 110 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 143 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 153 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 144 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 167 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 167 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 166 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 132 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 155 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 134 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 137 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 102 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 112 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 110 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 116 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 97 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 103 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 87 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 90 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 78 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 75 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 67 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 69 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 59 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 53 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 42 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 41 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 33 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 32 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 45 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 19 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 24 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 28 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 31 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 20 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 12 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 24 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 23 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 15 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 15 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 11 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 17 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 12 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 11 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 9 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 9 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 11 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 4 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 8 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 5 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 3 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 4 scientists 184 D-Index: 4 scientists 185+ D-Index: 99 scientists
70 D-Index 185+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott M. Croom is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has an extensive research portfolio within the fields of physics and astronomy. Their work focuses primarily on astronomy and astrophysics, with significant contributions to instrumentation, computational mechanics, and related subfields.

Their research spans a range of topics including galaxies: formation, evolution, and phenomena; astronomy and astrophysical research; stellar, planetary, and galactic studies; astrophysics and star formation studies; gamma-ray bursts and supernovae; astronomical observations and instrumentation; and broader astrophysical phenomena and observations.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Scott M. Croom include:

  • The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: The growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9, 2024, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Data Release 4 and the z < 0.1 total and z < 0.08 morphological galaxy stellar mass functions, 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Testing the cosmological model with baryon acoustic oscillations at z= 0.6, 2024, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the transition to large-scale cosmic homogeneity, 2024, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • The SAMI Galaxy Survey: the third and final data release, 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Scott M. Croom frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Jesse van de Sande
  • Joss Bland-Hawthorn
  • Julia J. Bryant
  • Sarah Brough
  • Sarah M. Sweet

Their research has been published extensively in a number of scientific venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • UNC Libraries

Scott M. Croom's primary and subfields of study include:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Instrumentation
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

The main topics of their work reflect a broad engagement with both theoretical and observational aspects of astrophysics, including the formation and evolution of galaxies, detailed stellar and galactic processes, as well as the development and application of astronomical instrumentation and methods.

Best Publications

  • Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release

    S. P. Driver;D. T. Hill;L. S. Kelvin;A. S. G. Robotham

  • The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: mapping the distance-redshift relation with baryon acoustic oscillations

    Chris Blake;Eyal A. Kazin;Florian Beutler;Tamara M. Davis;Tamara M. Davis

  • The 6dF Galaxy Survey: final redshift release (DR3) and southern large-scale structures

    D. Heath Jones;Mike A. Read;Will Saunders;Matthew Colless

  • The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey – XII. The spectroscopic catalogue and luminosity function

    S. M. Croom;R. J. Smith;B. J. Boyle;T. Shanks

  • The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - I. The Optical QSO Luminosity Function

    B. J. Boyle;T. Shanks;S. M. Croom;R. J. Smith

  • The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z < 1

    Chris Blake;Sarah Brough;Matthew Colless;Carlos Contreras

  • The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey — I. The optical luminosity function of quasi-stellar objects

    Brian John Boyle;Tom Shanks;Scott Croom;R Smith

  • Galaxy And Mass Assembly: Stellar Mass Estimates

    Edward N Taylor;Andrew M Hopkins;Ivan K Baldry;Michael J I Brown

  • The Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral field spectrograph

    Scott M. Croom;Jon S. Lawrence;Jon S. Lawrence;Joss Bland-Hawthorn;Julia J. Bryant

  • Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): stellar mass estimates

    Edward N Taylor;Edward N Taylor;Andrew M Hopkins;Ivan K Baldry;Michael J I Brown

  • Galaxy and mass assembly (GAMA): End of survey report and data release 2

    J.. Liske;I.K.. Baldry;S.P.. Driver;S.P.. Driver;R.J.. Tuffs

  • The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: survey design and first data release

    Michael J. Drinkwater;Russell J. Jurek;Chris Blake;David Woods;David Woods

  • Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the galaxy stellar mass function at z < 0.06

    Ivan K Baldry;Simon P Driver;Simon P Driver;J Loveday;Edward Taylor;Edward Taylor

  • The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9

    Chris Blake;Sarah Brough;Matthew Colless;Carlos Contreras

  • The SAMI Galaxy Survey: Instrument specification and target selection

    J. J. Bryant;J. J. Bryant;M. S. Owers;A. S. G. Robotham;S. M. Croom

  • The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function

    Scott M. Croom;B. J. Boyle;T. Shanks;R. J. Smith

  • GAMA: towards a physical understanding of galaxy formation

    Simon P. Driver;Peder Norberg;Ivan K. Baldry;Steven P. Bamford

  • Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): the GAMA galaxy group catalogue (G3Cv1)

    A Robotham;Peder Norberg;Simon Driver;Simon Driver;Ivan Baldry

  • The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: improved distance measurements to z = 1 with reconstruction of the baryonic acoustic feature

    Eyal A. Kazin;Jun Koda;Chris Blake;Nikhil Padmanabhan

  • The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO survey: QSO clustering and the L-z degeneracy

    J. DaÂngela;T. Shanks;S. M. Croom;P. Weilbacher

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah Brough
Sarah Brough University of New South Wales
Rob Sharp
Rob Sharp Australian National University
Joss Bland-Hawthorn
Joss Bland-Hawthorn University of Sydney
Tom Shanks
Tom Shanks Durham University
Matthew Colless
Matthew Colless Australian National University
Simon P. Driver
Simon P. Driver University of Western Australia
Andrew M. Hopkins
Andrew M. Hopkins Macquarie University
Kevin A. Pimbblet
Kevin A. Pimbblet University of Hull
Lance Miller
Lance Miller University of Oxford
Michael J. Drinkwater
Michael J. Drinkwater University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Scott M. Croom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles