World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jack L. Cronenwett

Jack L. Cronenwett

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
20138
World Ranking
16309
National Ranking
8202

Jack L. Cronenwett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack L. Cronenwett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 414 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jack L. Cronenwett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack L. Cronenwett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jack L. Cronenwett is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, epidemiology, and neurology.

Their work extensively covers topics related to cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, peripheral artery disease management, aortic aneurysm repair treatments, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, acute ischemic stroke management, cardiovascular health and disease prevention, and vascular procedures and complications.

Frequent publication venues for Cronenwett include:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • BMJ Surgery Interventions & Health Technologies
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
  • JVS-Vascular Insights

Some notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Cronenwett are:

  • TransCarotid Revascularization With Dynamic Flow Reversal Versus Carotid Endarterectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative Surveillance Project, 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Mortality After Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Angioplasty and Stenting of Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Artery in the Vascular Quality Initiative, 2020, Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Editor's Choice - Optimal Threshold for the Volume-Outcome Relationship After Open AAA Repair in the Endovascular Era: Analysis of the International Consortium of Vascular Registries, 2021, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • Recent advances and controversial issues in the optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis, 2023, Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Editor's Choice - Protamine Reduces Serious Bleeding Complications Associated with Carotid Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Patients without Increasing the Risk of Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, or Death in a Large National Analysis, 2020, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Collaborations are a significant part of Cronenwett's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Jens Eldrup-Jørgensen
  • Vikram S. Kashyap
  • Adam W. Beck
  • Marc L. Schermerhorn
  • Daniel J. Bertges

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery.

    David C. Brewster;Jack L. Cronenwett;John W. Hallett;K.Wayne Johnston

  • In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk.

    Mark F. Fillinger;M.L. Raghavan;Steven P. Marra;Jack L. Cronenwett

  • The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative

    Jack L. Cronenwett;Larry W. Kraiss;Richard P. Cambria

  • Rutherford's vascular surgery /

    [edited by] Jack L. Cronenwett;K. Wayne Johnston

  • Longitudinal comparison of dialysis access methods: risk factors for failure.

    Timothy C. Hodges;Mark F. Fillinger;Robert M. Zwolak;Daniel B. Walsh

  • Survival After Open Versus Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair in an Observational Study of the Medicare Population

    Philip P. Goodney;Lori Travis;F. Lee Lucas;Mark F. Fillinger

  • The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients

    Daniel J. Bertges;Philip P. Goodney;Yuanyuan Zhao;Andres Schanzer

  • Intermittent Claudication Current Results of Nonoperative Management

    Jack L. Cronenwett;Kenneth G. Warner;Gerald B. Zelenock;Walter M. Whitehouse

  • Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a consensus statement.

    K.Craig Kent;Robert M Zwolak;Michael R Jaff;Scott T Hollenbeck

  • National trends in open surgical, endovascular, and branched-fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare patients

    Bjoern D. Suckow;Philip P. Goodney;Jesse A. Columbo;Ravinder Kang

  • Results of an aortic endograft trial: impact of device failure beyond 12 months.

    Hugh G. Beebe;Jack L. Cronenwett;Barry T. Katzen;David C. Brewster

  • A regional registry for quality assurance and improvement: The Vascular Study Group of Northern New England (VSGNNE)

    Jack L. Cronenwett;Donald S. Likosky;Margaret T. Russell;Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen

  • Variations in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Care A Report From the International Consortium of Vascular Registries

    Adam W. Beck;Art Sedrakyan;Jialin Mao;Maarit Venermo

  • Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis

    Marc L. Schermerhorn;Patric Liang;Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen;Jack L. Cronenwett

  • Mesenteric stenting for chronic mesenteric ischemia

    David J. Brown;Marc L. Schermerhorn;Richard J. Powell;Mark F. Fillinger

  • Retrograde mesenteric stenting during laparotomy for acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia.

    Mark C. Wyers;Richard J. Powell;Brian W. Nolan;Jack L. Cronenwett

  • Atherosclerotic extracranial carotid artery aneurysms.

    Robert M. Zwolak;Walter M. Whitehouse;James E. Knake;Barry D. Bernfeld

  • Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

    Mahmoud B. Malas;Hanaa Dakour-Aridi;Grace J. Wang;Vikram S. Kashyap

  • Mesenteric and celiac duplex scanning: a validation study.

    Robert M. Zwolak;Mark F. Fillinger;Daniel B.. Walsh;F. Alizabeth LaBombard

  • Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms - a consensus statement

    K Craig Kent;Robert M Zwolak;Michael R Jaff;Scott T Hollenbeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip P. Goodney
Philip P. Goodney Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center
John D. Birkmeyer
John D. Birkmeyer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gilbert R. Upchurch
Gilbert R. Upchurch University of Florida
Richard P. Cambria
Richard P. Cambria Harvard University
Michael R. Jaff
Michael R. Jaff Boston Scientific (United States)
Michael S. Conte
Michael S. Conte University of California, San Francisco
Mitchell W. Krucoff
Mitchell W. Krucoff Duke University
James E. Tcheng
James E. Tcheng Duke University
Michel S. Makaroun
Michel S. Makaroun University of Pittsburgh
Thomas F. O'Donnell
Thomas F. O'Donnell Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative routes in healthcare can open up a wide range of career opportunities outside traditional medical degrees. For students with a bachelor’s in a non-nursing field, pursuing the non nursing bachelor's to msn online pathway is a flexible option that leads to advanced practice nursing without starting from scratch.

Additionally, there are many online bsn programs for non nurses designed to help career changers enter the nursing profession quickly and efficiently. Many of these programs are tailored for busy adults and offer convenient learning schedules.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, financial support is available through financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, making education more accessible. Medical billing and coding roles are in high demand and can be a solid entry point to the industry.

If standardized entrance exams are a concern, some nursing programs without teas or HESI requirements allow prospective students to begin their nursing career without these common testing barriers. This can make the path to a rewarding healthcare profession smoother and less stressful.

Best Scientists Citing Jack L. Cronenwett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles