World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 53 2267 2062 21 20 171 13895

Karen J. Hofman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karen J. Hofman between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karen J. Hofman published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2021. 6 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2021. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1980 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karen J. Hofman: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 5
1994 5
1995 1
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 4
2005 2
2006 4
2007 1
2008 0
2009 3
2010 1
2011 1
2012 3
2013 13
2014 13
2015 15
2016 11
2017 15
2018 7
2019 6
2020 14
2021 24
2022 15
2023 17
2024 3
2025 3
Total 197
Download as CSV

Karen J. Hofman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen J. Hofman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 171
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Karen J. Hofman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen J. Hofman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141 53
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Karen J. Hofman is affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine, Health Professions, and Business, Management and Accounting. They have contributed extensively to Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

Their work addresses significant topics including Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, Child Nutrition and Water Access, Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling, Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare, and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life.

Recent publications by Karen J. Hofman include:

  • Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health, 2023, The Lancet
  • Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating, 2021, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Public health response to ultra-processed food and drinks, 2020, BMJ
  • Industry strategies in the parliamentary process of adopting a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa: a systematic mapping, 2020, Globalization and Health
  • Changes in beverage purchases following the announcement and implementation of South Africa's Health Promotion Levy: an observational study, 2021, The Lancet Planetary Health

Frequent collaborators in their research include Agnes Erzse, Safura Abdool Karim, Susan Goldstein, Petronell Kruger, and Anne Marie Thow.

Karen J. Hofman has published notably in the following venues:

  • Global Health Action
  • Public Health Nutrition
  • South African Medical Journal
  • BMC Public Health
  • BMJ

Best Publications

  • The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control.

    Derek Yach;Corinna Hawkes;C. Linn Gould;Karen J. Hofman

  • Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief—an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report

    Felicia Marie Knaul;Paul E Farmer;Eric L Krakauer;Eric L Krakauer;Liliana De Lima

  • Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health

    Unknown

  • Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis

    Maria A Cabrera Escobar;J Lennert Veerman;Stephen M Tollman;Melanie Y Bertram

  • Addressing the growing burden of trauma and injury in low- and middle-income countries

    Karen Hofman;Aron Primack;Gerald Keusch;Sharon Hrynkow

  • Public health. Implementation science.

    Temina Madon;Karen J Hofman;Linda Kupfer;Roger I Glass

  • Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating

    Barry M Popkin;Simon Barquera;Camila Corvalan;Karen J Hofman

  • Physicians' knowledge of genetics and genetic tests.

    Karen J. Hofman;Ellen S. Tambor;Gary A. Chase;Gail Geller

  • Neurofibromatosis type 1: The cognitive phenotype

    Karen J. Hofman;Emily L. Harris;R. Nick Bryan;Martha B. Denckla

  • Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an HMO population: factors associated with utilization.

    Ellen S. Tambor;Barbara A. Bernhardt;Gary A. Chase;Ruth R. Faden

  • The global burden of chronic diseases.

    Yach D;Hawkes C;Gould L;Hofman Kj

  • A novel disease with deficiency of mitochondrial very-long-chain Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase

    Toshifumi Aoyama;Yasushi Uchida;Richard I. Kelley;Michael Marble

  • Scaling Up Family Planning to Reduce Maternal and Child Mortality: The Potential Costs and Benefits of Modern Contraceptive Use in South Africa.

    Lumbwe Chola;Shelley McGee;Aviva Tugendhaft;Eckhart Buchmann

  • Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage

    Kalipso Chalkidou;Amanda Glassman;Robert Marten;Jeanette Vega

  • The potential impact of a 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages on obesity in South African adults: a mathematical model

    Mercy Manyema;Lennert J. Veerman;Lumbwe Chola;Aviva Tugendhaft

  • The cost of injury and trauma care in low- and middle-income countries: a review of economic evidence.

    Hadley K H Wesson;Nonkululeko Boikhutso;Abdulgafoor M Bachani;Karen J Hofman

  • Improving response rates through incentive and follow-up: the effect on a survey of physicians' knowledge of genetics.

    E S Tambor;G A Chase;R R Faden;G Geller

  • Deletion of Huntington's disease-linked G8 (D4S10) locus in Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome

    James F. Gusella;Rudolph E. Tanzi;Patricia I. Bader;Mary C. Phelan

  • Relationship between T2-weighted hyperintensities (unidentified bright objects) and lower IQs in children with neurofibromatosis-1

    M. B. Denckla;K. Hofman;M. M.M. Mazzocco;E. Melhem

  • Neurofibromatosis type 1: the evolution of deep gray and white matter MR abnormalities.

    T. Itoh;S. Magnaldi;R. M. White;M. B. Denckla

  • Closing the mental health treatment gap in South Africa: a review of costs and cost-effectiveness

    Helen Jack;Ryan G. Wagner;Inge Petersen;Rita Thom

  • Determinants of Obesity and Associated Population Attributability, South Africa: Empirical Evidence from a National Panel Survey, 2008-2012.

    Benn Sartorius;Lennert J. Veerman;Mercy Manyema;Lumbwe Chola

  • Disease and Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa, Second Edition

    Eduard R. Bos;Dean T. Jamison;Florence Baingana;Richard G. A Feacham

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen Tollman
Stephen Tollman University of the Witwatersrand
Kalipso Chalkidou
Kalipso Chalkidou Center for Global Development
Anne Marie Thow
Anne Marie Thow University of Sydney
Gail Geller
Gail Geller Johns Hopkins University
Ruth R. Faden
Ruth R. Faden Johns Hopkins University
Kathleen Kahn
Kathleen Kahn University of the Witwatersrand
Dean T. Jamison
Dean T. Jamison University of California, San Francisco
Charles R. Newton
Charles R. Newton University of Oxford
Stéphane Verguet
Stéphane Verguet Harvard University
Martha B. Denckla
Martha B. Denckla Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for flexible education in Social Sciences and Humanities is growing. Many students and professionals now choose online programs to balance their studies with work and personal commitments. Exploring options like online masters programs can help you advance your knowledge rapidly and efficiently, often in as little as one year.

For those looking to start their academic journey, an online bachelor's degree offers a convenient and fast-tracked way to build foundational skills. These programs are ideal for individuals eager to join the workforce or move on to graduate studies quickly.

If you are passionate about helping others, pursuing affordable online msw programs can open doors to careers in social work and public service. Similarly, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst is easier than ever with online bcba programs designed to prepare you for working with diverse populations.

These online degrees not only offer flexibility and accessibility but also cater to a wide variety of career pathways within the Social Sciences and Humanities. Whether you are seeking entry-level qualifications or specialized credentials, there is a program to fit your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Karen J. Hofman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles