World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
53
Citations
9353
World Ranking
2329
National Ranking
1124

Gail Geller publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail Geller sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 158 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Gail Geller D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail Geller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gail Geller is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics, including:

  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Innovations in Medical Education

Geller has published extensively, contributing articles to a range of academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
  • Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • UNC Libraries

Selected recent publications by Geller include:

  • "Tolerance for Ambiguity Among Medical Students: Patterns of Change During Medical School and Their Implications for Professional Development," 2020, Academic Medicine
  • "Experimental Philosophical Bioethics," 2020, AJOB Empirical Bioethics
  • "Tolerance for Uncertainty and Professional Development: a Normative Analysis," 2021, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • "Development of a Scale to Measure Trust in Public Health Authorities: Prevalence of Trust and Association with Vaccination," 2021, Journal of Health Communication
  • "Surgeons' Views on Shared Decision-Making," 2020, Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews

The scientist has frequently collaborated with other researchers, with notable coauthors including:

  • Juli Bollinger
  • Jeremy Sugarman
  • Debra Mathews
  • Jeffrey Kahn
  • Janesse Brewer

Best Publications

  • Prevalence, Detection, and Treatment of Alcoholism in Hospitalized Patients

    Richard D. Moore;Lee R. Bone;Gail Geller;Joyce A. Mamon

  • Science communication reconsidered.

    Tania M. Bubela;Matthew C. Nisbet;Rick Borchelt;Fern Brunger

  • Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research

    Juli Murphy;Joan Scott;David Kaufman;Gail Geller

  • Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Adult-Onset Cancer: The Process and Content of Informed Consent

    Gail Geller;Jeffrey R. Botkin;Michael J. Green;Nancy Press

  • Transitioning to breast cancer survivorship: Perspectives of patients, cancer specialists, and primary care providers

    Melinda Kantsiper;Erin L. McDonald;Gail Geller;Gail Geller;Lillie Shockney;Lillie Shockney

  • Physicians' knowledge of genetics and genetic tests.

    Karen J. Hofman;Ellen S. Tambor;Gary A. Chase;Gail Geller

  • Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Alcoholism in Elderly Patients

    J. Randall Curtis;Gail Geller;Emma J. Stokes;David M. Levine

  • Knowledge, attitudes, and reported practices of medical students and house staff regarding the diagnosis and treatment of alcoholism.

    Gail Geller;David M. Levine;Joyce A. Mamon;Richard D. Moore

  • The Essential Role of Medical Ethics Education in Achieving Professionalism: The Romanell Report

    Joseph A. Carrese;Janet Malek;Katie Watson;Lisa Soleymani Lehmann

  • Measuring physicians' tolerance for ambiguity and its relationship to their reported practices regarding genetic testing.

    Gail Geller;Ellen S. Tambor;Gary A. Chase;Neil A. Holtzman

  • The moral nature of patient-centeredness: Is it “just the right thing to do”?

    Patrick S. Duggan;Gail Geller;Gail Geller;Lisa A. Cooper;Lisa A. Cooper;Mary Catherine Beach

  • Tolerance for ambiguity among medical students: Implications for their selection, training and practice

    Gail Geller;Ruth R. Faden;David M. Levine

  • Public Perspectives on Informed Consent for Biobanking

    Juli Murphy;Joan Scott;David Kaufman;Gail Geller

  • Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an HMO population: factors associated with utilization.

    Ellen S. Tambor;Barbara A. Bernhardt;Gary A. Chase;Ruth R. Faden

  • Effects of obstetrician gender on communication and patient satisfaction

    Debra L. Roter;Gail A.I.L. Geller;Barbara A. Bernhardt;Susan M. Larson

  • Improving response rates through incentive and follow-up: the effect on a survey of physicians' knowledge of genetics.

    E S Tambor;G A Chase;R R Faden;G Geller

  • Cultural basis for differences between US and French clinical recommendations for women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

    F Eisinger;G Geller;W Burke;NA Holtzman

  • What Does ‘Respect’ Mean? Exploring the Moral Obligation of Health Professionals to Respect Patients

    Mary Catherine Beach;Mary Catherine Beach;Patrick S. Duggan;Christine K. Cassel;Gail Geller;Gail Geller

  • Informed consent for enrolling minors in genetic susceptibility research: a qualitative study of at-risk children's and parents' views about children's role in decision-making

    Gail Geller;Ellen S Tambor;Barbara A Bernhardt;Gertrude Fraser

  • Participation in Breast Cancer Susceptibility Testing Protocols: Influence of Recruitment Source, Altruism, and Family Involvement on Women’s Decisions

    Gail Geller;Teresa Doksum;Barbara A. Bernhardt;Sharon A. Metz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth R. Faden
Ruth R. Faden Johns Hopkins University
Mary Catherine Beach
Mary Catherine Beach Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Karen J. Hofman
Karen J. Hofman University of the Witwatersrand
Chloe L. Thio
Chloe L. Thio Johns Hopkins University
Debra L. Roter
Debra L. Roter Johns Hopkins University
Kathy J. Helzlsouer
Kathy J. Helzlsouer National Institutes of Health
Richard D. Moore
Richard D. Moore Johns Hopkins University
David W. Kaufman
David W. Kaufman Boston University
Lawrence S. Wissow
Lawrence S. Wissow University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to meaningful careers in mental health, counseling, research, and social work. Today, students benefit from flexible online degree options that cater to diverse goals and schedules.

For those looking to minimize costs without sacrificing quality, many seek out the most affordable online psychology degree programs. These offer foundational knowledge in human behavior and can lead to a wide range of career opportunities.

Interested in helping communities and advocating for social justice? Consider the msw programs, which prepare students for impactful roles in social work with flexible admission options.

Those aiming for advanced clinical practice and licensure may choose from the psyd program options available online, focusing on practical psychology skills and supervised experience.

For aspiring marriage and family therapists, the best online mft programs offer streamlined paths to licensure, often with accelerated timelines and strong support for working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Gail Geller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles