World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
59
Citations
23801
World Ranking
1523
National Ranking
730

Mildred K. Cho publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mildred K. Cho sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 183 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mildred K. Cho D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mildred K. Cho sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mildred K. Cho is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and contributes extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on public health, genetics, and health informatics. Their work intersects with various subfields including occupational health, physiology, and general health professions.

The primary research topics covered by Cho encompass:

  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • BRCA Gene Mutations in Cancer
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Race, Genetics, and Society

Cho's recent papers illustrate the emphasis placed on ethical considerations within healthcare technologies and genetics. Notable publications include:

  • "Ethical issues in using ambient intelligence in health-care settings" (2020), published in The Lancet Digital Health
  • "Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study" (2021), published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • "Digital Contact Tracing, Privacy, and Public Health" (2020), published in The Hastings Center Report
  • "Taking an antiracist posture in scientific publications in human genetics and genomics" (2021), published in Genetics in Medicine
  • "Three decades of ethical, legal, and social implications research: Looking back to chart a path forward" (2022), published in Cell Genomics

The scientist frequently publishes in venues focused on bioethics and medical genetics, which include:

  • The American Journal of Bioethics
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • AJOB Empirical Bioethics
  • The Hastings Center Report
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Cho collaborates regularly with other researchers, with several co-authors appearing frequently in their work. These co-authors include:

  • Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
  • Deanne Dunbar Dolan
  • Nicole Martinez-Martin
  • David Magnus
  • Kyle B. Brothers

The extensive focus on ethical frameworks, clinical research ethics, and the social dimensions of artificial intelligence and genomics highlights Cho's integration of medicine with interdisciplinary ethical inquiry.

Best Publications

  • The International HapMap Project

    John W. Belmont;Paul Hardenbol;Thomas D. Willis;Fuli Yu

  • Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement

    C Begg;M Cho;S Eastwood;R Horton

  • Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendations

    Susan M Wolf;Frances P Lawrenz;Charles A. Nelson;Jeffrey P. Kahn

  • Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.

    Susan M Wolf;Brittney N. Crock;Brian G Van Ness;Frances P Lawrenz

  • Integrating genotype and phenotype information: an overview of the PharmGKB project

    T. E. Klein;Jeffrey T Chang;M. K. Cho;K. L. Easton

  • The Quality of Drug Studies Published in Symposium Proceedings

    Mildred K. Cho;Lisa A. Bero

  • A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Erik Andrew;Aslam Anis;Tom Chalmers;Mildred Cho

  • Genetic Research and Health Disparities

    Pamela Sankar;Mildred K. Cho;Celeste M. Condit;Linda M. Hunt

  • Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Amy C. Justice;Mildred K. Cho;Margaret A. Winker;Jesse A. Berlin

  • Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research

    Judy Illes;Matthew P. Kirschen;Emmeline Edwards;L R. Stanford

  • Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement.

    Timothy Caulfield;Amy L. McGuire;Mildred Cho;Janet A. Buchanan

  • Policies on faculty conflicts of interest at US universities.

    Mildred K. Cho;Ryo Shohara;Anna Schissel;Drummond Rennie

  • Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing.

    Amy L. McGuire;Timothy Caulfield;Mildred K. Cho

  • Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.

    Stephanie A. Kraft;Mildred K. Cho;Katherine Gillespie;Meghan Halley

  • Feasibility of Obtaining Measures of Lifestyle From a Smartphone App: The MyHeart Counts Cardiovascular Health Study.

    Michael V. McConnell;Anna Shcherbina;Aleksandra Pavlovic;Julian R. Homburger

  • Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature

    Mildred K. Cho;Lisa A. Bero

  • Three slow myosin heavy chains sequentially expressed in developing mammalian skeletal muscle

    Simon M. Hughes;Mildred Cho;Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi;Marilyn Travis

  • Commercial landscape of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States.

    Ashwin Agarwal;Lauren C. Sayres;Mildred K. Cho;Robert Cook-Deegan

  • Effects of Patents and Licenses on the Provision of Clinical Genetic Testing Services

    Mildred K. Cho;Samantha Illangasekare;Meredith A. Weaver;Debra G.B. Leonard

  • Toward a New Vocabulary of Human Genetic Variation

    Pamela Sankar;Mildred K. Cho

  • Data mining for health: staking out the ethical territory of digital phenotyping.

    Nicole Martinez-Martin;Thomas R. Insel;Paul Dagum;Henry T. Greely

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin S. Wilfond
Benjamin S. Wilfond University of Washington
Jon F. Merz
Jon F. Merz University of Pennsylvania
Henry T. Greely
Henry T. Greely Stanford University
Alexander Morgan Capron
Alexander Morgan Capron University of Southern California
Timothy Caulfield
Timothy Caulfield University of Alberta
Judy Illes
Judy Illes University of British Columbia
Ellen Wright Clayton
Ellen Wright Clayton Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Susan M. Wolf
Susan M. Wolf University of Minnesota
Marion Danis
Marion Danis National Institutes of Health
Arthur L. Caplan
Arthur L. Caplan New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens many flexible online degree options in the USA. If you are considering a clinical psychology path, a part time psyd can prepare you for advanced practice while balancing work and life commitments. Those drawn to family therapy may benefit from accelerated mft programs that offer a quicker route to licensure and employment in marriage and family therapy.

For broader or non-clinical psychology roles, earning an online psychology masters is both an affordable and flexible option, helping professionals access new opportunities in research, education, and counseling fields. Meanwhile, academic leaders and administrators can pursue edd programs online to advance their qualifications with the convenience of a fast-track format.

These online degrees are tailored for busy adults and career-changers, making it easier than ever to gain credentials needed for in-demand roles in social services, education, and human behavior research. Choose the pathway that aligns with your career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Mildred K. Cho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles