World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 55 1945 1760 930 830 228 32544

Ellen Wright Clayton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ellen Wright Clayton between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ellen Wright Clayton published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2020. 27 of the 307 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2020. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 17 publications
1978 2025

307 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ellen Wright Clayton: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 3
1991 0
1992 6
1993 8
1994 3
1995 8
1996 5
1997 5
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 5
2002 1
2003 7
2004 4
2005 4
2006 5
2007 5
2008 5
2009 8
2010 6
2011 23
2012 7
2013 20
2014 10
2015 9
2016 12
2017 6
2018 13
2019 10
2020 24
2021 18
2022 13
2023 14
2024 10
2025 17
Total 307
Download as CSV

Ellen Wright Clayton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen Wright Clayton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 228 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 228
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ellen Wright Clayton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen Wright Clayton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137 55
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - David Rall Medal, National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2006 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Ellen Wright Clayton is affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular emphasis on genetics and public health.

The researcher's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these areas, their work focuses on several subfields, notably:

  • Genetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Physiology

Key topics covered in their research comprise:

  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

Ellen Wright Clayton has published extensively, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • Genetics in Medicine
  • The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Representative recent papers include:

  • ISSCR Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2021 Update, 2021, Stem Cell Reports
  • Human-Centered Design to Address Biases in Artificial Intelligence, 2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Selection, Optimization and Validation of Ten Chronic Disease Polygenic Risk Scores for Clinical Implementation in Diverse US Populations, 2024, Nature Medicine
  • Sociotechnical Safeguards for Genomic Data Privacy, 2022, Nature Reviews Genetics
  • Returning Integrated Genomic Risk and Clinical Recommendations: The eMERGE Study, 2023, Genetics in Medicine

Collaboration is an important aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Bradley Malin
  • Wendy K. Chung
  • Ingrid A. Holm
  • Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
  • Zhiyu Wan

Their contributions to the field have been recognized with several awards:

  • David Rall Medal, National Academy of Medicine (NAM), 2013
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2011
  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), 2006

Best Publications

  • The International HapMap Project

    John W. Belmont;Paul Hardenbol;Thomas D. Willis;Fuli Yu

  • A haplotype map of the human genome

    John W. Belmont;Andrew Boudreau;Suzanne M. Leal;Paul Hardenbol

  • A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs

    Kelly A. Frazer;Dennis G. Ballinger;David R. Cox;David A. Hinds

  • Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations

    Pardis C. Sabeti;Pardis C. Sabeti;Patrick Varilly;Patrick Varilly;Ben Fry;Jason Lohmueller

  • Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendations

    Susan M Wolf;Frances P Lawrenz;Charles A. Nelson;Jeffrey P. Kahn

  • Factors That Prompted Families to File Medical Malpractice Claims Following Perinatal Injuries

    Gerald B. Hickson;Ellen Wright Clayton;Penny B. Githens;Frank A. Sloan

  • Obstetricians' prior malpractice experience and patients' satisfaction with care.

    Gerald B. Hickson;Ellen Wright Clayton;Stephen S. Entman;Cynthia S. Miller

  • Operational implementation of prospective genotyping for personalized medicine: The design of the Vanderbilt PREDICT project

    J. M. Pulley;J. C. Denny;J. F. Peterson;G. R. Bernard

  • Guidelines on forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment

    A. Kohrman;E. W. Clayton;J. E. Frader;M. A. Grodin

  • Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices In Between

    Gail P. Jarvik;Laura M. Amendola;Jonathan S. Berg

  • Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Genomic Medicine

    Ellen Wright Clayton

  • Informed Consent for Genetic Research on Stored Tissue Samples

    Ellen Wright Clayton;Karen K. Steinberg;Muin J. Khoury;Elizabeth Thomson

  • Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: Updated guidelines from a national heart, lung, and blood institute working group

    Richard R. Fabsitz;Amy McGuire;Richard R. Sharp;Mona Puggal

  • Hereditary Hemochromatosis: Gene Discovery and Its Implications for Population-Based Screening

    Wylie Burke;Elizabeth Thomson;Muin J. Khoury;Sharon M. McDonnell

  • Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!

    Wylie Burke;Armand H. Matheny Antommaria;Robin Bennett;Jeffrey Botkin

  • Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality

    Kathleen Stratton;Andrew Ford;Erin Rusch;Ellen Wright Clayton

  • Principles of Human Subjects Protections Applied in an Opt-Out, De-identified Biobank

    Jill Pulley;Ellen Clayton;Gordon R. Bernard;Dan M. Roden

  • Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.

    Saskia C. Sanderson;Saskia C. Sanderson;Saskia C. Sanderson;Nathaniel D. Mercaldo;Ellen Wright Clayton

  • The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations

    Ellen Wright Clayton;Barbara J Evans;James W Hazel;Mark A Rothstein

  • A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.

    Nanibaa' A. Garrison;Nila A. Sathe;Armand H. Matheny Antommaria;Ingrid A. Holm

  • Newborn Screening Technology: Proceed With Caution

    Jeffrey R. Botkin;Ellen Wright Clayton;Norman C. Fost;Wylie Burke

Frequent Co-Authors

Bradley A. Malin
Bradley A. Malin Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Wylie Burke
Wylie Burke University of Washington
Ingrid A. Holm
Ingrid A. Holm Boston Children's Hospital
Susan M. Wolf
Susan M. Wolf University of Minnesota
Benjamin S. Wilfond
Benjamin S. Wilfond University of Washington
Bartha Maria Knoppers
Bartha Maria Knoppers McGill University Health Centre
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik Washington University in St. Louis
Catherine A. McCarty
Catherine A. McCarty University of Minnesota
Gail P. Jarvik
Gail P. Jarvik University of Washington
Wendy K. Chung
Wendy K. Chung Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide range of fulfilling careers, especially in areas like social work, psychology, and behavioral analysis. Many students are now exploring msw online programs as a flexible way to earn a Master of Social Work that prepares them for roles in counseling, advocacy, and community leadership.

If you’re interested in working with individuals with behavioral challenges, an accelerated bcba program online can help you qualify to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst in less time. For students seeking a faster route, options like an accelerated msw program online are designed to quickly move graduates into the workforce.

Those drawn to the study of human behavior and mental processes may also consider a fast track psychology degree online, allowing for quicker entry into psychology-related professions. Online degrees offer the flexibility and affordability many students need, making it easier to balance educational goals with life’s other commitments, all while preparing for diverse career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Ellen Wright Clayton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles