World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 165 1043 958 618 556 1100 107398
Medicine 168 567 517 330 296 1096 112070

Dan M. Roden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dan M. Roden between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dan M. Roden published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 26.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2020. 37 of the 1,225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2020. 1980: 5 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 17 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 14 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 11 publications 1989: 16 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 32 publications 2006: 36 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 47 publications 2009: 46 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 39 publications 2012: 47 publications 2013: 49 publications 2014: 56 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 51 publications 2018: 49 publications 2019: 47 publications 2020: 61 publications 2021: 59 publications 2022: 51 publications 2023: 56 publications 2024: 55 publications 2025: 35 publications 2026: 2 publications
1980 2026

1,225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dan M. Roden: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 5
1981 6
1982 5
1983 7
1984 17
1985 8
1986 14
1987 10
1988 11
1989 16
1990 15
1991 10
1992 7
1993 7
1994 8
1995 6
1996 9
1997 8
1998 13
1999 21
2000 12
2001 17
2002 14
2003 12
2004 17
2005 32
2006 36
2007 27
2008 47
2009 46
2010 32
2011 39
2012 47
2013 49
2014 56
2015 29
2016 44
2017 51
2018 49
2019 47
2020 61
2021 59
2022 51
2023 56
2024 55
2025 35
2026 2
Total 1,225
Download as CSV

Dan M. Roden publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan M. Roden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,081–1,100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,096 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49 1,096
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Dan M. Roden D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan M. Roden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 168–169 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 168 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42 168
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Dan M. Roden is affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, molecular biology, genetics, hematology, and physiology.

The scientist's work covers numerous topical areas, including:

  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Genomics and rare diseases
  • Cardiomyopathy and myosin studies
  • Genetic associations and epidemiology
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer

Dan M. Roden has published extensively in several key venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Circulation
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Nature Communications
  • Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine

Their recent notable papers include:

  • "Genomic data in the All of Us Research Program," published in 2024 in Nature
  • "Predictive Accuracy of a Polygenic Risk Score Compared With a Clinical Risk Score for Incident Coronary Heart Disease," published in 2020 in JAMA
  • "The All of Us Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity," published in 2022 in Patterns
  • "The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for SLCO1B1, ABCG2, and CYP2C9 genotypes and Statin-Associated Musculoskeletal Symptoms," published in 2022 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • "Considerations for Drug Interactions on QTc in Exploratory COVID-19 Treatment," published in 2020 in Circulation

Throughout their career, Dan M. Roden has frequently collaborated with colleagues including:

  • M. Benjamin Shoemaker
  • Andrew M. Glazer
  • Quinn S. Wells
  • Matthew J. O'Neill
  • Giovanni Davogustto

Dan M. Roden has contributed to over 346 publications in medicine and 230 in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work notably intersects with cardiology and cardiovascular medicine with 187 publications, and molecular biology with 116 publications. Genetic research, hematology, and physiology also form significant components of their portfolio.

In recognition of their work, the scientist was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death)

    Douglas P. Zipes;A. John Camm;Martin Borggrefe;Alfred E. Buxton

  • Fulminant Myocarditis with Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade

    Douglas B. Johnson;Justin M. Balko;Margaret L. Compton;Spyridon Chalkias

  • Drug-induced prolongation of the QT interval.

    Dan M. Roden

  • Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program.

    Daniel Taliun;Daniel N. Harris;Michael D. Kessler;Jedidiah Carlson;Jedidiah Carlson

  • Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial.

    Bruce L. Wilkoff;James R. Cook;Andrew E. Epstein;Leon Greene

  • Guías de Práctica Clínica del ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 sobre el manejo de pacientes con arritmias ventriculares y la prevención de la muerte cardiaca súbita. Versión resumida.

    Douglas P. Zipes;A. John Camm;Martin Borggrefe;Alfred E. Buxton

  • Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data

    Klein Te;Altman Rb;Eriksson N

  • PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations.

    Joshua C. Denny;Marylyn D. Ritchie;Melissa A. Basford;Jill M. Pulley

  • The drug transporter P-glycoprotein limits oral absorption and brain entry of HIV-1 protease inhibitors.

    R. B. Kim;M. F. Fromm;C. Wandel;B. Leake

  • Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data

    Joshua C. Denny;Lisa Bastarache;Marylyn D. Ritchie;Robert J. Carroll

  • A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics

    Ryan L Collins;Ryan L Collins;Harrison Brand;Harrison Brand;Konrad J Karczewski;Konrad J Karczewski;Xuefang Zhao;Xuefang Zhao

  • Prevention of torsade de pointes in hospital settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

    Barbara J. Drew;Michael John Ackerman;Marjorie Funk;W. Brian Gibler

  • Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guidelines for CYP2C19 Genotype and Clopidogrel Therapy: 2013 Update

    Scott Sa;Sangkuhl K;Stein Cm;Hulot Js;Hulot Js

  • Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine.

    DM Roden;JM Pulley;MA Basford;GR Bernard

  • ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death

    Douglas P. Zipes;A. John Camm;Martin Borggrefe;Alfred E. Buxton

  • Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study.

    Joe-Elie Salem;Joe-Elie Salem;Ali Manouchehri;Melissa Moey;Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes

  • Multiple mechanisms in the long-QT syndrome. Current knowledge, gaps, and future directions. The SADS Foundation Task Force on LQTS.

    Dan M. Roden;Ralph Lazzara;Michael Rosen;Peter J. Schwartz

  • TAKING THE IDIO OUT OF IDIOSYNCRATIC : PREDICTING TORSADES DE POINTES

    Dan M. Roden

  • Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program

    Daniel Taliun;Daniel N. Harris;Michael D. Kessler;Jedidiah Carlson;Jedidiah Carlson

  • Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

    Douglas P Zipes;A John Camm;Martin Borggrefe;Alfred E Buxton

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua C. Denny
Joshua C. Denny National Institutes of Health
Marylyn D. Ritchie
Marylyn D. Ritchie University of Pennsylvania
Patrick T. Ellinor
Patrick T. Ellinor Harvard University
Richard B. Kim
Richard B. Kim University of Western Ontario
Steven A. Lubitz
Steven A. Lubitz Harvard University
Alfred L. George
Alfred L. George Northwestern University
Dana C. Crawford
Dana C. Crawford Case Western Reserve University
David N. Juurlink
David N. Juurlink University of Toronto
Bruce M. Psaty
Bruce M. Psaty University of Washington
Gail P. Jarvik
Gail P. Jarvik University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in medicine extends beyond traditional medical school. Many students begin their journeys with related online degrees, which can open doors to a variety of career paths in healthcare. These programs are ideal for those seeking flexibility, affordability, or a stepping stone toward a higher credential.

Prospective nurses often look for options such as cheap online nursing programs, which make entering the field more accessible. If you are already an RN, consider advancing your skills with the cheapest rn to bsn program to increase your earning potential and job opportunities.

Those interested in specialized practice can benefit from the cheapest fnp programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner with minimal debt. For those aiming for leadership or academic roles, phd in nursing online programs offer a flexible path to advanced expertise.

By choosing affordable and accredited online options, you can find a career pathway that matches your goals—whether at the bedside, in clinics, or as a healthcare leader.

Best Scientists Citing Dan M. Roden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles