World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
11423
World Ranking
4115
National Ranking
1949

Bradley A. Malin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley A. Malin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 260 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bradley A. Malin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley A. Malin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Bradley A. Malin is affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the intersection of computer science and medicine, particularly exploring artificial intelligence applications, health informatics, and privacy-preserving technologies in healthcare.

Malin's scholarly work has been published in various prominent venues, with notable frequency in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Their main fields of study cover:

  • Computer Science
  • Medicine

Within these disciplines, Malin specializes in subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Sociology and Political Science

Malin's research topics include:

  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Topic Modeling
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Recent papers illustrate the breadth of Malin's work:

  • "Predicting Missing Values in Medical Data Via XGBoost Regression," 2020, Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research
  • "Human-Centered Design to Address Biases in Artificial Intelligence," 2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy," 2022, Nature Reviews Genetics
  • "A Multifaceted benchmarking of synthetic electronic health record generation models," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "From GPT to DeepSeek: Significant gaps remain in realizing AI in healthcare," 2025, Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Chao Yan
  • Ellen Wright Clayton
  • Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
  • Zhijun Yin
  • Zhiyu Wan

Malin has also contributed to academic publishing through book chapters, including a work published by Springer Science+Business Media titled "Data and Applications Security and Privacy XXXVI" in 2022.

The scientist has been recognized through election as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Preserving privacy by de-identifying face images

    E.M. Newton;L. Sweeney;B. Malin

  • A Systematic Review of Re-Identification Attacks on Health Data

    Khaled El Emam;Elizabeth Jonker;Luk Arbuckle;Bradley Malin

  • Generating Multi-label Discrete Patient Records using Generative Adversarial Networks

    Edward Choi;Siddharth Biswal;Bradley A. Malin;Jon Duke

  • Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy rule

    Kathleen Benitez;Bradley A. Malin

  • How (not) to protect genomic data privacy in a distributed network: using trail re-identification to evaluate and design anonymity protection systems

    Bradley Malin;Latanya Sweeney

  • Privacy in the Genomic Era

    Muhammad Naveed;Erman Ayday;Ellen W. Clayton;Jacques Fellay

  • Anonymising and sharing individual patient data.

    Khaled El Emam;Khaled El Emam;Sam Rodgers;Bradley Malin

  • Limestone: High-throughput candidate phenotype generation via tensor factorization

    Joyce C. Ho;Joydeep Ghosh;Steven R. Steinhubl;Walter F. Stewart

  • Rubik: Knowledge Guided Tensor Factorization and Completion for Health Data Analytics

    Yichen Wang;Robert Chen;Joydeep Ghosh;Joshua C. Denny

  • A Cryptographic Approach to Securely Share and Query Genomic Sequences

    M. Kantarcioglu;Wei Jiang;Ying Liu;B. Malin

  • Integrating utility into face de-identification

    Ralph Gross;Edoardo Airoldi;Bradley Malin;Latanya Sweeney

  • An evaluation of the current state of genomic data privacy protection technology and a roadmap for the future.

    Bradley A. Malin

  • Unsupervised Name Disambiguation via Social Network Similarity

    Bradley Malin

  • Biomedical data privacy: problems, perspectives, and recent advances

    Bradley A Malin;Khaled El Emam;Khaled El Emam;Christine M O'Keefe

  • The MITRE Identification Scrubber Toolkit: Design, training, and assessment

    John S. Aberdeen;Samuel Bayer;Reyyan Yeniterzi;Benjamin Wellner

  • Anonymization of electronic medical records for validating genome-wide association studies

    Grigorios Loukides;Aris Gkoulalas-Divanis;Bradley Malin

  • The disclosure of diagnosis codes can breach research participants' privacy.

    Grigorios Loukides;Joshua C. Denny;Bradley A. Malin

  • Predicting Missing Values in Medical Data via XGBoost Regression

    Xinmeng Zhang;Chao Yan;Cheng Gao;Bradley A Malin

  • Design and implementation of a privacy preserving electronic health record linkage tool in Chicago.

    Abel N Kho;John P Cashy;Kathryn L Jackson;Adam R Pah

  • A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.

    Ellen W. Clayton;Colin M. Halverson;Nila A. Sathe;Bradley A. Malin

  • Technical and policy approaches to balancing patient privacy and data sharing in clinical and translational research.

    Bradley Malin;David Karp;Richard H. Scheuermann

  • Correction: a systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data.

    Khaled El Emam;Elizabeth Jonker;Luk Arbuckle;Bradley Malin

Frequent Co-Authors

Murat Kantarcioglu
Murat Kantarcioglu The University of Texas at Dallas
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik Washington University in St. Louis
Ellen Wright Clayton
Ellen Wright Clayton Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Joshua C. Denny
Joshua C. Denny National Institutes of Health
Carl A. Gunter
Carl A. Gunter University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jimeng Sun
Jimeng Sun University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Khaled El Emam
Khaled El Emam University of Ottawa
Francesco Bonchi
Francesco Bonchi Institute for Scientific Interchange
Edoardo M. Airoldi
Edoardo M. Airoldi Temple University
Joydeep Ghosh
Joydeep Ghosh The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring various educational routes is essential for those interested in Computer Science in the USA. While a bachelor’s program is the traditional entryway, several other academic options can help you build a strong foundation or advance your career.

If you want a flexible and affordable start, consider online associate’s degree programs. These often provide a solid introduction to core computer science concepts and can be completed in two years. For cost-conscious students, cheap online college classes allow you to gain credits or skills without a high price tag.

Many professionals enhance their prospects by pursuing one of the most useful masters degrees in areas like artificial intelligence, data science, or cybersecurity. These in-demand programs can significantly improve your job market value.

Worried about your grades? Some reputable institutions are known as best online colleges that accept low GPA applicants, opening doors to advanced study or career pivots even with less-than-perfect transcripts.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley A. Malin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles