World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
15632
World Ranking
2898
National Ranking
1426

Murat Kantarcioglu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Murat Kantarcioglu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 433 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Murat Kantarcioglu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Murat Kantarcioglu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2016 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2013 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Murat Kantarcioglu is affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States and has a research focus primarily in Computer Science, with an emphasis on Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. Their scholarly output includes extensive work on the intersection of privacy, security, and data management within computer science.

Their research contributions cover a variety of topics, including:

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Topological and Geometric Data Analysis

Kantarcioglu has published numerous papers across respected venues. Recent publications include:

  • "Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy," 2022, Nature Reviews Genetics
  • "Does Explainable Artificial Intelligence Improve Human Decision-Making?", 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Trailblazing the Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity Discipline," 2020, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
  • "Modern Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage Techniques: An Overview," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
  • "Defending against Backdoors in Federated Learning with Robust Learning Rate," 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Their work has appeared frequently in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • IEEE Security & Privacy

Kantarcioglu has collaborated repeatedly with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Bradley Malin
  • Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
  • Yulia R. Gel
  • Ellen Wright Clayton
  • Cüneyt Gürcan Akçora

Recognition in the scientific community includes distinctions such as:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2020
  • ACM Distinguished Member, 2016
  • ACM Senior Member, 2013

Best Publications

  • Privacy-preserving distributed mining of association rules on horizontally partitioned data

    M. Kantarcioglu;C. Clifton

  • Tools for privacy preserving distributed data mining

    Chris Clifton;Murat Kantarcioglu;Jaideep Vaidya;Xiaodong Lin

  • Access Pattern disclosure on Searchable Encryption: Ramification, Attack and Mitigation.

    Mohammad Saiful Islam;Mehmet Kuzu;Murat Kantarcioglu

  • Efficient Similarity Search over Encrypted Data

    Mehmet Kuzu;Mohammad Saiful Islam;Murat Kantarcioglu

  • Security Issues for Cloud Computing

    Kevin Hamlen;Murat Kantarcioglu;Latifur Khan;Bhavani Thuraisingham

  • Inferring private information using social network data

    Jack Lindamood;Raymond Heatherly;Murat Kantarcioglu;Bhavani Thuraisingham

  • Security and Privacy in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Survey of Surveys

    Jairo Giraldo;Esha Sarkar;Alvaro A. Cardenas;Michail Maniatakos

  • Secure multidimensional range queries over outsourced data

    Bijit Hore;Sharad Mehrotra;Mustafa Canim;Murat Kantarcioglu

  • Privacy-preserving Naïve Bayes classification

    Jaideep Vaidya;Murat Kantarcıoğlu;Chris Clifton

  • Privacy-preserving data integration and sharing

    Chris Clifton;Murat Kantarcioǧlu;AnHai Doan;Gunther Schadow

  • Defining Privacy for Data Mining

    Chris Clifton;Murat Kantarcioglu;Jaideep Vaidya

  • A semantic web based framework for social network access control

    Barbara Carminati;Elena Ferrari;Raymond Heatherly;Murat Kantarcioglu

  • Preventing Private Information Inference Attacks on Social Networks

    R. Heatherly;M. Kantarcioglu;B. Thuraisingham

  • Private record matching using differential privacy

    Ali Inan;Murat Kantarcioglu;Gabriel Ghinita;Elisa Bertino

  • Adversarial Machine Learning

    Yevgeniy Vorobeychik;Murat Kantarcioglu

  • An Approach to Evaluate Data Trustworthiness Based on Data Provenance

    Chenyun Dai;Dan Lin;Elisa Bertino;Murat Kantarcioglu

  • Privacy-preserving decision trees over vertically partitioned data

    Jaideep Vaidya;Chris Clifton;Murat Kantarcioglu;A. Scott Patterson

  • A Cryptographic Approach to Securely Share and Query Genomic Sequences

    M. Kantarcioglu;Wei Jiang;Ying Liu;B. Malin

  • When do data mining results violate privacy

    Murat Kantarcioǧlu;Jiashun Jin;Chris Clifton

  • Semantic web-based social network access control

    Barbara Carminati;Elena Ferrari;Raymond Heatherly;Murat Kantarcioglu

Frequent Co-Authors

Bhavani Thuraisingham
Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas
Latifur Khan
Latifur Khan The University of Texas at Dallas
Bradley A. Malin
Bradley A. Malin Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette
Chris Clifton
Chris Clifton Purdue University West Lafayette
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik Washington University in St. Louis
Sharad Mehrotra
Sharad Mehrotra University of California, Irvine
Jaideep Vaidya
Jaideep Vaidya Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Alain Bensoussan
Alain Bensoussan The University of Texas at Dallas
Ellen Wright Clayton
Ellen Wright Clayton Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degree options can open doors to new careers in tech, business, and more. For students interested in digital security, consider a cyber security degree to build expertise in safeguarding data and systems—a growing need across all sectors.

If you're drawn to leadership roles and project management, especially in the construction industry, pursuing an online construction management masters could be the next step. This degree equips you with skills in planning, coordinating, and managing large-scale construction projects.

For those interested in law, forensics, or public service, the best online criminal justice degree programs provide a flexible way to enter fields such as law enforcement or security analysis.

Managing finances is central to many organizations. Exploring accounting degree cost can help you find affordable pathways to start a career in accountancy, audit, or financial analysis.

Each of these online degree options complements a foundation in Computer Science, giving you interdisciplinary skills for a dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Murat Kantarcioglu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles