World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James N. Ingle

James N. Ingle

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
86567
World Ranking
6089
National Ranking
3262

James N. Ingle publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Ingle sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 569 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James N. Ingle D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Ingle sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James N. Ingle is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these broader areas, their work is specialized in Oncology, Cancer Research, Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis

James N. Ingle has contributed to multiple scientific publications, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Cancer Research (24 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (15 publications)
  • Clinical Cancer Research (12 publications)
  • UNC Libraries (11 publications)
  • npj Breast Cancer (6 publications)

Among their notable recent papers are:

  • "Radiotherapy to regional nodes in early breast cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 14,324 women in 16 trials," 2023, The Lancet
  • "Aurora-A kinase oncogenic signaling mediates TGF-β-induced triple-negative breast cancer plasticity and chemoresistance," 2021, Oncogene
  • "Association Between 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Score and Locoregional Recurrence Rates in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer," 2020, JAMA Oncology
  • "Folate receptor alpha expression associates with improved disease-free survival in triple negative breast cancer patients," 2020, npj Breast Cancer
  • "Characteristics and Spatially Defined Immune (micro)landscapes of Early-stage PD-L1-positive Triple-negative Breast Cancer," 2021, Clinical Cancer Research

Throughout their career, James N. Ingle has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Matthew P. Goetz
  • Judy C. Boughey
  • Krishna R. Kalari
  • Roberto A. Leon-Ferre
  • Jodi M. Carter

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Daniel C. Koboldt;Robert S. Fulton;Michael D. McLellan;Heather Schmidt

  • Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer

    Edward H. Romond;Edith A. Perez;John Bryant;Vera J. Suman

  • Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013

    A Goldhirsch;E P Winer;A S Coates;R D Gelber

  • Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials

    C Davies;J Godwin;Richard Gray

  • A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early-stage breast cancer

    Paul E. Goss;James N. Ingle;Silvana Martino;Nicholas J. Robert

  • Randomized Trial of Dose-Dense Versus Conventionally Scheduled and Sequential Versus Concurrent Combination Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment of Node-Positive Primary Breast Cancer: First Report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741

    Marc L. Citron;Donald A. Berry;Constance Cirrincione;Clifford Hudis

  • Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009

    Aron Goldhirsch;J. N. Ingle;R. D. Gelber;A. S. Coates

  • Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial

    Kathy S Albain;William E Barlow;Steven Shak;Gabriel N Hortobagyi

  • Improved Outcomes From Adding Sequential Paclitaxel but Not From Escalating Doxorubicin Dose in an Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen for Patients With Node-Positive Primary Breast Cancer

    I. Craig Henderson;Donald A. Berry;George D. Demetri;Constance T. Cirrincione

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment on the Use of Aromatase Inhibitors As Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: Status Report 2004

    Eric P. Winer;Clifford Hudis;Harold J. Burstein;Antonio C. Wolff

  • Randomized Trial of Letrozole Following Tamoxifen as Extended Adjuvant Therapy in Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Updated Findings from NCIC CTG MA.17

    Paul E. Goss;James N. Ingle;Silvana Martino;Nicholas J. Robert

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 Update on the Role of Bisphosphonates and Bone Health Issues in Women With Breast Cancer

    Bruce E. Hillner;James N. Ingle;Rowan T. Chlebowski;Julie Gralow

  • Exemestane for Breast-Cancer Prevention in Postmenopausal Women

    Paul E. Goss;James N. Ingle;José E. Alés-Martínez;Angela M. Cheung

  • Meta-Analysis of Breast Cancer Outcomes in Adjuvant Trials of Aromatase Inhibitors Versus Tamoxifen

    Mitch Dowsett;Jack Cuzick;Jim Ingle;Alan Coates

  • Pharmacogenetics of Tamoxifen Biotransformation Is Associated With Clinical Outcomes of Efficacy and Hot Flashes

    Matthew P. Goetz;James M. Rae;Vera J. Suman;Stephanie L. Safgren

  • Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, and the Combination of Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel as Front-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Intergroup Trial (E1193)

    George W. Sledge;Donna Neuberg;Patricia Bernardo;James N. Ingle

  • Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials

    Bernard Asselain;William Barlow;John Bartlett;Jonas Bergh

  • HER2 and Response to Paclitaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer

    Daniel F. Hayes;Ann D. Thor;Lynn G. Dressler;Donald Weaver

  • Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer

    Prudence A. Francis;Prudence A. Francis;Meredith M. Regan;Gini F. Fleming;István Láng

  • Phase II Trial of Bicalutamide in Patients with Androgen Receptor–Positive, Estrogen Receptor–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

    Ayca Gucalp;Ayca Gucalp;Sara Tolaney;Steven J. Isakoff;James N. Ingle

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew P. Goetz
Matthew P. Goetz Mayo Clinic
Vera J. Suman
Vera J. Suman Mayo Clinic
Paul E. Goss
Paul E. Goss Harvard University
Liewei Wang
Liewei Wang Mayo Clinic
Edith A. Perez
Edith A. Perez Mayo Clinic
Daniel J. Schaid
Daniel J. Schaid Mayo Clinic
Kathleen I. Pritchard
Kathleen I. Pritchard University of Toronto
Fergus J. Couch
Fergus J. Couch Mayo Clinic
Nancy E. Davidson
Nancy E. Davidson University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the medical field doesn’t always require a traditional path. Students interested in alternative or flexible options can consider several high-demand careers outside of the classic MD route. For example, those with a bachelor’s degree in a non-nursing major may qualify for direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online. These accelerated programs allow individuals to transition into advanced nursing roles quickly.

If you’re looking for accessible entry points to healthcare careers, you might want to review what is the easiest nursing program to get into. Some schools offer lower barriers to entry, supporting diverse applicant backgrounds.

For those interested in medical administration or remote work, check out the best online medical billing and coding schools. These programs typically take less time to complete and can lead to rewarding careers in healthcare data.

Additionally, future licensed practical nurses (LPNs) may choose an lpn program without teas test or other entrance exam requirements, making healthcare education more accessible. Many pathways exist to join the growing U.S. healthcare workforce—find the one that fits your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing James N. Ingle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles