World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 112 5039 4725 101 96 711 86182

Jonas Bergh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonas Bergh between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonas Bergh published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 16.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 135 publications in 2023. 65 of the 915 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 135. Peak 135 publications in 2023. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 33 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 39 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 135 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 34 publications
1970 2025

915 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonas Bergh: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 5
1986 4
1987 3
1988 7
1989 10
1990 8
1991 10
1992 4
1993 9
1994 12
1995 17
1996 10
1997 13
1998 18
1999 15
2000 14
2001 21
2002 12
2003 18
2004 8
2005 33
2006 24
2007 26
2008 12
2009 20
2010 26
2011 25
2012 29
2013 22
2014 25
2015 26
2016 28
2017 41
2018 39
2019 33
2020 33
2021 22
2022 27
2023 135
2024 31
2025 34
Total 915
Download as CSV

Jonas Bergh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas Bergh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 701–720 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 711 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307 711
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonas Bergh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas Bergh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399 112
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonas Bergh is affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine, particularly focusing on oncology and cancer research. Their scholarly work spans multiple disciplines such as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant emphasis on cancer treatment studies and diagnostics.

Their research output demonstrates engagement with key subfields including oncology, cancer research, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and molecular biology. Jonas Bergh's work frequently addresses topics such as breast cancer treatment studies, HER2/EGFR in cancer research, advanced breast cancer therapies, cancer treatment and pharmacology, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and the application of radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging.

Jonas Bergh has published numerous papers in prominent scientific journals. Selected recent publications include:

  • Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5), 2020, Annals of Oncology
  • Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, 2023, Annals of Oncology
  • Overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer, 2022, Annals of Oncology

The venues most frequently publishing Jonas Bergh's work include:

  • ESMO Open
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Clinical Cancer Research

Collaboration has been an important aspect of their research endeavors. Frequent co-authors include Theodoros Foukakis, Alexios Matikas, Ioannis Zerdes, Johan Hartman, and Emmanouil G. Sifakis.

Best Publications

  • Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials

    O. Abe;R. Abe;K. Enomoto;K. Kikuchi

  • Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis

    Patricia Cortazar;Lijun Zhang;Michael Untch;Keyur Mehta

  • Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013

    A Goldhirsch;E P Winer;A S Coates;R D Gelber

  • Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer: Understanding the Molecular Basis of Histologic Grade To Improve Prognosis

    Christos Sotiriou;Pratyaksha Wirapati;Sherene Loi;Adrian Harris

  • Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

    Peter Schmid;Javier Cortes;Lajos Pusztai;Heather McArthur

  • Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.

    R Peto;C Davies;J Godwin

  • 2-year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial

    Ian Smith;Marion Procter;Richard D Gelber;Sébastien Guillaume

  • 3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3)

    F. Cardoso;A. Costa;E. Senkus;M. Aapro

  • An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival

    Lance D. Miller;Johanna Smeds;Joshy George;Vinsensius B. Vega

  • Validation and Clinical Utility of a 70-Gene Prognostic Signature for Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer

    Marc Buyse;Sherene Loi;Laura van't Veer;Giuseppe Viale

  • 20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years.

    Hongchao Pan;Richard Gray;Jeremy Braybrooke;Christina Davies

  • De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017

    G. Curigliano;H. J. Burstein;E. P. Winer;M. Gnant

  • Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series,

    Christine Desmedt;Fanny Piette;Sherene Loi;Yixin Wang

  • Identification of molecular apocrine breast tumours by microarray analysis

    Pierre Farmer;Herve Bonnefoi;Véronique Becette;Michele Tubiana-Hulin

  • Definition of Clinically Distinct Molecular Subtypes in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Carcinomas Through Genomic Grade

    Sherene Loi;Benjamin Haibe-Kains;Christine Desmedt;Françoise Lallemand

  • Gene expression profiling spares early breast cancer patients from adjuvant therapy: derived and validated in two population-based cohorts.

    Yudi Pawitan;Judith Bjöhle;Lukas Amler;Anna-Lena Borg

  • Identification of molecular apocrine breast tumours by microarray analysis

    P Farmer;H Bonnefoi;V Becette;M Tubiana-Hulin

  • Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials

    Bernard Asselain;William Barlow;John Bartlett;Jonas Bergh

  • Genetic Reclassification of Histologic Grade Delineates New Clinical Subtypes of Breast Cancer

    Anna V. Ivshina;Joshy George;Oleg Senko;Benjamin Mow

  • ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)

    F. Cardoso;A. Costa;L. Norton;E. Senkus

Frequent Co-Authors

Fatima Cardoso
Fatima Cardoso Champalimaud Foundation
Peter Nygren
Peter Nygren Uppsala University
Per Hall
Per Hall Karolinska Institute
Kamila Czene
Kamila Czene Karolinska Institute
Michael Gnant
Michael Gnant Medical University of Vienna
Martine Piccart
Martine Piccart Université Libre de Bruxelles
Christos Sotiriou
Christos Sotiriou Université Libre de Bruxelles
Mauro Delorenzi
Mauro Delorenzi University of Lausanne
Kenneth Nilsson
Kenneth Nilsson Uppsala University
Carl Blomqvist
Carl Blomqvist University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional path to becoming a doctor. There are multiple related fields and online degree options that lead to high-demand roles in healthcare. For example, if you are interested in medication therapy, you might consider earning an online pharmacist degree. This degree prepares you for a variety of pharmacy roles in hospitals, clinics, and community settings.

For those drawn to the organizational and technical side of healthcare, HIM programs focus on managing electronic health records and ensuring data security, while medical billing and coding classes online offer a fast entry into administrative roles that keep clinics and hospitals running efficiently.

If patient care is your passion, but medical school isn’t the right fit, consider cheap np programs which can help you become a nurse practitioner and deliver advanced care in many settings. Each of these online degree options opens distinct career pathways within healthcare, offering flexibility and affordability for future professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Jonas Bergh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles