World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Douglas Holtz-Eakin

Douglas Holtz-Eakin

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
45
Citations
20857
World Ranking
1699
National Ranking
1000

Douglas Holtz-Eakin publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas Holtz-Eakin sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 130 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas Holtz-Eakin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas Holtz-Eakin is primarily affiliated with the American Action Forum in the United States. Their research spans areas within economics, econometrics, and finance, with a focus on fiscal policy as well as economic theory and policy.

Among recent papers, Douglas Holtz-Eakin contributed to the publication titled Comment and Discussion in 2020, featured in the Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. They have also been connected to related work on fiscal policy responses to economic inequality, authored by Jason Furman, published in Business Economics in 2020.

Frequent co-authorship includes collaboration with:

  • Jason Furman

Their work has appeared in journals including:

  • Business Economics
  • Brookings Papers on Economic Activity

Douglas Holtz-Eakin's main fields of study consist of:

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

The subfields of study they have contributed to include:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

The primary research topics studied by Douglas Holtz-Eakin are:

  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Economic Theory and Policy
  • Fiscal Policies and Political Economy

Best Publications

  • Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Whitney Newey;Harvey S. Rosen

  • Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Thomas M. Selden;Thomas M. Selden

  • Sticking it Out: Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;David Joulfaian;Harvey S. Rosen

  • Public-Sector Capital and the Productivity Puzzle

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin

  • Financial Capital, Human Capital, and the Transition to Self‐Employment: Evidence from Intergenerational Links

    Thomas Dunn;Douglas Holtz-Eakin

  • Entrepreneurial Decisions and Liquidity Constraints

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;David Joulfaian;Harvey S Rosen

  • Entrepreneurial Decisions and Liquidity Constraints

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;David Joulfaian;Harvey S. Rosen

  • Spatial Productivity Spillovers from Public Infrastructure: Evidence from State Highways

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Amy Schwartz

  • Infrastructure in a Structural Model of Economic Growth

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Amy Ellen Schwartz

  • The Carnegie Conjecture: Some Empirical Evidence

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;David Joulfaian;Harvey S. Rosen

  • Financial Capital, Human Capital, and the Transition to Self-Employment:Evidence from Intergenerational Links

    Thomas A. Dunn;Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Douglas Holtz-Eakin

  • Scale Economies, Returns to Variety, and the Productivity of Public Infrastructure

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Mary E. Lovely

  • Sticking it Out: Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Douglas Holtz-Eakin;David Joulfaian;David Joulfaian;Harvey S. Rosen;Harvey S. Rosen;Harvey S. Rosen

  • Productivity and wage effects of “family‐friendly” fringe benefits

    Reagan Baughman;Daniela DiNardi;Douglas Holtz‐Eakin

  • Health insurance and the supply of entrepreneurs

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;John R. Penrod;Harvey S. Rosen

  • Stoking the Fires? Co2 Emissions and Economic Growth

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Thomas M. Selden

  • Income taxes and entrepreneurs' use of labor

    Robert Carroll;Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Mark Rider;Harvey S Rosen

  • Spatial productivity spillovers from public infrastructure: Evidence from state highways

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Amy Ellen Schwartz

  • Public Policy Toward Entrepreneurship

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin

  • Public-Sector Capital and the Productivity Puzzle

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Douglas Holtz-Eakin

  • The Revenues-Expenditures Nexus: Evidence from Local Government Data

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Whitney K Newey;Harvey S Rosen

  • Entrepreneurial Decisions and Liquidity Constraints

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin;Douglas Holtz-Eakin;David Joulfaian;David Joulfaian;Harvey S. Rosen;Harvey S. Rosen;Harvey S. Rosen

Frequent Co-Authors

Harvey S. Rosen
Harvey S. Rosen Princeton University
Amy Ellen Schwartz
Amy Ellen Schwartz Syracuse University
Alan S. Blinder
Alan S. Blinder Princeton University
Richard V. Burkhauser
Richard V. Burkhauser Cornell University
Thomas M. Selden
Thomas M. Selden Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Timothy M. Smeeding
Timothy M. Smeeding University of Wisconsin–Madison
John Yinger
John Yinger Syracuse University
Douglas A. Wolf
Douglas A. Wolf Syracuse University
Allan H Meltzer
Allan H Meltzer Carnegie Mellon University
R. Glenn Hubbard
R. Glenn Hubbard Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Economics and Finance opens doors to a variety of dynamic career options. Many students today consider is a bachelor degree in project management worth it as they look for roles that blend leadership skills with business expertise. Project management offers a solid foundation for overseeing initiatives in banks, startups, and government.

For those aiming to launch their careers quickly, accelerated finance programs provide a fast way to gain practical finance skills and industry credentials. You can also consider an intensive MBA. A fast track mba 6 months program offers advanced business knowledge and leadership opportunities in a fraction of the time.

If your interests lie in foundational accounting practices, obtaining a professional credential can set you apart. Many students ask which bookkeeping certification is best to help them enter vital financial support roles in diverse organizations. Whether you pursue finance, project management, or bookkeeping, online programs offer the flexibility to match your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas Holtz-Eakin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles