World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
24113
World Ranking
17509
National Ranking
267

Mark A. Fox publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Fox sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 407 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark A. Fox D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Fox sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Fox is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research output primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with specific subfields including Surgery, Gastroenterology, Physiology, Speech and Hearing, and Genetics.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as:

  • Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Diet and metabolism studies

Mark A. Fox has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (11 publications)
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (4 publications)
  • Gastroenterology (4 publications)
  • United European Gastroenterology Journal (3 publications)
  • Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (3 publications)

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • "Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©", 2020, Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • "Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0", 2023, Gut
  • "European guideline on indications, performance, and clinical impact of hydrogen and methane breath tests in adult and pediatric patients: European Association for Gastroenterology, Endoscopy and Nutrition, European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, and European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition consensus", 2021, United European Gastroenterology Journal
  • "What is new in Chicago Classification version 4.0?", 2020, Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • "Low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet compared with traditional dietary advice for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with analysis of clinical and microbiological factors associated with patient outcomes", 2021, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Frequent collaborators in research include:

  • Rami Sweis (12 joint publications)
  • Rena Yadlapati (6 joint publications)
  • Jan Tack (6 joint publications)
  • John E. Pandolfino (6 joint publications)
  • Edoardo Savarino (5 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

    P J Kahrilas;A J Bredenoord;Mark Fox;C P Gyawali

  • Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus

    C Prakash Gyawali;Peter J Kahrilas;Edoardo Savarino;Frank Zerbib

  • Chicago Classification Criteria of Esophageal Motility Disorders Defined in High Resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography

    A. J. Bredenoord;M. Fox;P. J. Kahrilas;J. E. Pandolfino

  • Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©

    Rena Yadlapati;Peter J. Kahrilas;Mark R. Fox;Albert J. Bredenoord

  • Oesophageal high-resolution manometry - moving from research into clinical practice

    Mark R Fox;Albert J Bredenoord

  • High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities

    J. E. Pandolfino;M. R. Fox;A. J. Bredenoord;P. J. Kahrilas

  • Lactose intolerance in adults: Biological mechanism and dietary management

    Yanyong Deng;Benjamin Misselwitz;Ning Dai;Mark Fox

  • Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group.

    S. Roman;C. P. Gyawali;E. Savarino;R. Yadlapati

  • Human intestine luminal ACE2 and amino acid transporter expression increased by ACE-inhibitors.

    Raphael N. Vuille-dit-Bille;Simone M. Camargo;Luca Emmenegger;Tom Sasse

  • Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment

    Benjamin Misselwitz;Daniel Pohl;Heiko Frühauf;Michael Fried

  • Guidelines for the investigation of chronic diarrhoea in adults: British Society of Gastroenterology, 3rd edition.

    Ramesh P. Arasaradnam;Steven P. Brown;Alastair Forbes;Mark R Fox

  • High‐resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry

    M. Fox;G. Hebbard;P. Janiak;J. G. Brasseur

  • Update on lactose malabsorption and intolerance: pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management

    Benjamin Misselwitz;Matthias Butter;Kristin Verbeke;Mark R Fox

  • Systemic review: the pathogenesis and pharmacological treatment of hiccups

    M Steger;M Schneemann;M Fox

  • Validation of criteria for the definition of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations using high-resolution manometry

    S. Roman;R. Holloway;J. Keller;F. Herbella

  • Effects of age on the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motility, and reflux disease.

    Jacqueline Lee;Angela Anggiansah;Roy Anggiansah;Alasdair Young

  • The international anorectal physiology working group (IAPWG) recommendations: Standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function

    Emma V Carrington;Henriette Heinrich;Charles H Knowles;Mark Fox

  • Expert consensus document: Advances in the diagnosis and classification of gastric and intestinal motility disorders

    Jutta Keller;Gabrio Bassotti;John Clarke;Phil Dinning

  • Classification of esophageal motor findings in gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Conclusions from an international consensus group.

    C. P. Gyawali;S. Roman;A. J. Bredenoord;M. Fox

  • The Acid Pocket: A Target for Treatment in Reflux Disease?

    Peter J Kahrilas;Kenneth McColl;Mark Fox;Lisa O'Rourke

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Fried
Michael Fried University of Zurich
Judith A. K. Howard
Judith A. K. Howard Durham University
Paul J. Low
Paul J. Low University of Western Australia
Andrei S. Batsanov
Andrei S. Batsanov Durham University
Peter Boesiger
Peter Boesiger ETH Zurich
John E. Pandolfino
John E. Pandolfino Northwestern University
Martin R. Bryce
Martin R. Bryce Durham University
Peter J. Kahrilas
Peter J. Kahrilas Northwestern University
Beate Neumann
Beate Neumann Bielefeld University
Hans-Georg Stammler
Hans-Georg Stammler Bielefeld University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and healthcare career pathways for students with different interests and goals. Whether you want to support clinical teams, provide direct patient care, or advance into research and academia, affordable online programs can help you get there.

For those interested in working behind the scenes in healthcare, exploring medical billing and coding cost is essential when comparing programs that lead to entry-level positions in health information management.

Aspiring nurses can benefit from comparing cheapest fnp programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner, or discovering what is the cheapest online college for nursing? to start a career in nursing with minimal financial burden.

Professionals seeking the highest level of expertise in nursing should consider the requirements and affordability of a phd in nursing, which can lead to roles in leadership, research, and academic settings.

Carefully evaluating program costs and career objectives ensures you find the right online degree and pathway to fit your aspirations in the evolving field of medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Fox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles