World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Boesiger

Peter Boesiger

Award Badge
Medicine
Switzerland
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 5997 5634 79 77 532 43492

Peter Boesiger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Boesiger between 1987 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Boesiger published across 30 years, from 1987 to 2016, averaging 18.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2008. 2 of the 554 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2008. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 31 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 19 publications 1999: 25 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 29 publications 2006: 36 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 39 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 35 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 36 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication
1987 2016

554 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Boesiger: publications per year, 1987 to 2016
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 4
1989 10
1990 7
1991 12
1992 13
1993 10
1994 12
1995 6
1996 31
1997 9
1998 19
1999 25
2000 15
2001 23
2002 15
2003 25
2004 19
2005 29
2006 36
2007 32
2008 39
2009 39
2010 35
2011 20
2012 36
2013 23
2014 6
2015 1
2016 1
Total 554
Download as CSV

Peter Boesiger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Boesiger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 532 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 532
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Boesiger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Boesiger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Peter Boesiger is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland, a prominent institution known for its focus on science and technology. Their academic profile shows involvement in scientific research, although specific details about their fields of study, subfields, or main topics are not listed.

There are no records of recent papers, including titles, publication venues, or years, available for Peter Boesiger. Similarly, information on frequent co-authors or frequent publication venues is not provided, which limits the description of their collaborative network or publishing patterns.

Details around book publications or awards won by Peter Boesiger are also absent from the available data. This restricts further insights into their contributions beyond academic articles or recognition within their discipline.

This concise profile is based solely on the confirmed affiliation at ETH Zurich and the absence of additional bibliometric or biographical information, reflecting a limited but verified overview of their academic presence.

Best Publications

  • SENSE: Sensitivity Encoding for fast MRI

    Klaas P Pruessmann;Markus Weiger;Markus B Scheidegger;Peter Boesiger

  • Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories.

    Klaas P. Pruessmann;Markus Weiger;Peter Börnert;Peter Boesiger

  • k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: Dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations

    Jeffrey Tsao;Peter Boesiger;Klaas P. Pruessmann

  • Imbalance between Left and Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Major Depression Is Linked to Negative Emotional Judgment : An fMRI Study in Severe Major Depressive Disorder

    Simone Grimm;Johannes Beck;Daniel Schuepbach;Daniel Hell

  • Compressed sensing in dynamic MRI

    Urs Gamper;Peter Boesiger;Sebastian Kozerke

  • Schizophrenia: glutathione deficit in cerebrospinal fluid and prefrontal cortex in vivo.

    K. Q. Do;A. H. Trabesinger;M. Kirsten-Krüger;C. J. Lauer

  • Transmit and receive transmission line arrays for 7 Tesla parallel imaging

    Gregor Adriany;Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele;Florian Wiesinger;Steen Moeller

  • Face perception is mediated by a distributed cortical network.

    Alumit Ishai;Conny F. Schmidt;Peter Boesiger

  • Alterations in the Local Myocardial Motion Pattern in Patients Suffering From Pressure Overload Due to Aortic Stenosis

    M Stuber;M B Scheidegger;S E Fischer;Eike Nagel

  • 4D MR imaging of respiratory organ motion and its variability

    M von Siebenthal;G Székely;U Gamper;P Boesiger

  • GABA concentrations in the human anterior cingulate cortex predict negative BOLD responses in fMRI

    Georg Northoff;Martin Walter;Rolf F Schulte;Johannes Beck

  • Altered Negative BOLD Responses in the Default-Mode Network during Emotion Processing in Depressed Subjects

    Simone Grimm;Peter Boesiger;Johannes Beck;Daniel Schuepbach

  • Striatal glucose metabolism and dopamine D2 receptor binding in asymptomatic gene carriers and patients with Huntington's disease

    A. Antonini;K. L. Leenders;R. Spiegel;D. Meier

  • Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla

    Michael Schär;Sebastian Kozerke;Stefan E. Fischer;Peter Boesiger

  • The relationship between aberrant neuronal activation in the pregenual anterior cingulate, altered glutamatergic metabolism, and anhedonia in major depression.

    Martin Walter;Anke Henning;Simone Grimm;Rolf F. Schulte

  • Soap-Bubble visualization and quantitative analysis of 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiograms

    Alex Etienne;Alex Etienne;René M. Botnar;René M. Botnar;Arianne M.C. van Muiswinkel;Peter Boesiger

  • A new correlation-based fuzzy logic clustering algorithm for fMRI

    Xavier Golay;Spyros Kollias;Gautier Stoll;Dieter Meier

  • Better Memory and Neural Efficiency in Young Apolipoprotein E ε4 Carriers

    Christian R. A. Mondadori;Dominique J. F. de Quervain;Andreas Buchmann;Henrietta Mustovic

  • In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging

    Roger Luechinger;Volkert A. Zeijlemaker;Erik Morre Pedersen;Peter Mortensen

  • Electrodynamics and ultimate SNR in parallel MR imaging

    Florian Wiesinger;Peter Boesiger;Klaas P. Pruessmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Stuber
Matthias Stuber University of Lausanne
Mark A. Fox
Mark A. Fox University of Zurich
René M. Botnar
René M. Botnar Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Eike Nagel
Eike Nagel Goethe University Frankfurt
Michael Fried
Michael Fried University of Zurich
Otto M. Hess
Otto M. Hess University of Bern
Georg Northoff
Georg Northoff University of Ottawa
Simone Grimm
Simone Grimm University of Zurich
Sven Plein
Sven Plein University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, there are several related online degrees and career pathways that can broaden your options. For those interested in the business side of healthcare, pursuing a healthcare administration degree online accredited can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals or clinics. This flexible option lets you balance your studies while gaining critical management skills.

Registered nurses planning to advance their clinical career might explore special bridge programs, such as adn to fnp bridge programs. These pathways help accelerate progress toward becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, often with convenient online courses.

Nutrition is also a vital part of healthcare. If you’re passionate about wellness, consider earning one of several online nutrition degrees that prepare you for roles in clinical settings, schools, or community programs.

Lastly, advancing into healthcare management is possible with a cahme accredited mha online programs degree. This credential is respected for its rigorous standards and can open doors to top administrative positions in health organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Boesiger

Recently Published Articles