World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
58608
World Ranking
3858
National Ranking
2109

Warren J. Manning publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren J. Manning sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 810 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Warren J. Manning D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren J. Manning sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Warren J. Manning is affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity, Ultrasound in Clinical Applications, Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments.

Warren J. Manning's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) guidance for the practice of cardiovascular magnetic resonance during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Present and Future Innovations in AI and Cardiac MRI, 2024, Radiology
  • Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Radiomics of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Reveals Prognostic Value of Myocardial Scar Heterogeneity in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, 2023, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Texture signatures of native myocardial T1 as novel imaging markers for identification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients without scar, 2020, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Reza Nezafat
  • Jennifer Rodriguez
  • Connie W. Tsao
  • Jordan B. Strom
  • Long Ngo

Warren J. Manning has published numerous articles in various academic journals. The most frequent venues for their publications are:

  • Circulation
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Best Publications

  • Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report.

    Dudley J. Pennell;Udo P. Sechtem;Charles B. Higgins;Warren J. Manning

  • American Society of Echocardiography Recommendations for Use of Echocardiography in Clinical Trials A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and The Task Force on Echocardiography in Clinical Trials

    John S. Gottdiener;James Bednarz;Richard Devereux;Julius Gardin

  • Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    John J. You;Daniel E. Singer;Patricia A. Howard;Deirdre A. Lane

  • Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Stenoses

    W. Yong Kim;W. Yong Kim;Peter G. Danias;Matthias Stuber;Scott D. Flamm

  • Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

    Daniel E Singer;Gregory W Albers;James E Dalen;Margaret C Fang

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Prognostic Value of Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Sudden Death Risk in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Raymond H. Chan;Barry J. Maron;Iacopo Olivotto;Michael J. Pencina

  • Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

    Daniel E. Singer;Gregory W. Albers;James E. Dalen;Alan S. Go

  • ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography

    Pamela S. Douglas;Mario J. Garcia;David E. Haines;Wyman W. Lai

  • Prevalence, Clinical Profile, and Significance of Left Ventricular Remodeling in the End-Stage Phase of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Kevin M. Harris;Paolo Spirito;Martin S. Maron;Andrey G. Zenovich

  • Occurrence and Frequency of Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Relation to Delayed Enhancement on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    A. Selcuk Adabag;Barry J. Maron;Evan Appelbaum;Evan Appelbaum;Caitlin J. Harrigan

  • A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography.

    Warren J. Manning;Wei Li;Robert R. Edelman

  • Impaired left atrial mechanical function after cardioversion: Relation to the duration of atrial fibrillation

    Warren J. Manning;David I. Silverman;Sarah E. Katz;Marilyn F. Riley

  • Expert Consensus DocumentACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Prevalence, Clinical Significance, and Natural History of Left Ventricular Apical Aneurysms in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Martin S. Maron;John J. Finley;J. Martijn Bos;Thomas H. Hauser

  • Rapamycin Attenuates Load-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy in Mice

    Tetsuo Shioi;Julie R. McMullen;Oleg Tarnavski;Kimber Converso

  • Vitamin D Therapy and Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: The PRIMO Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ravi Thadhani;Evan Appelbaum;Yili Pritchett;Yuchiao Chang

  • Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    Glenn N. Levine;Antoinette S. Gomes;Andrew E. Arai;David A. Bluemke

  • Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young

    David A. Bluemke;Stephan Achenbach;Matthew Budoff;Thomas C. Gerber

  • Communications to the EditorAntithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

    Warren J. Manning;David I. Silverman

Frequent Co-Authors

René M. Botnar
René M. Botnar Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Christopher J. O'Donnell
Christopher J. O'Donnell Harvard Medical School
Matthias Stuber
Matthias Stuber University of Lausanne
Philimon Gona
Philimon Gona University of Massachusetts Boston
Martin S. Maron
Martin S. Maron Tufts University
C. Michael Gibson
C. Michael Gibson Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Daniel Levy
Daniel Levy National Institutes of Health
Mark E. Josephson
Mark E. Josephson Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University
Barry J. Maron
Barry J. Maron University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degree opportunities and flexible career pathways in healthcare. For example, students interested in administrative roles can pursue a health administration degree online, preparing for dynamic leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, or health networks.

There are also options for those already working in the field to advance quickly. Programs like adn to fnp bridge programs make it possible for registered nurses to upskill and become family nurse practitioners, often entirely online.

If you prefer non-clinical tracks, consider medical office careers. Many accredited schools offer medical billing and coding financial aid options, making it easier to earn credentials without financial strain.

Nursing hopefuls worried about entrance exams can explore do you have to take a teas test for lpn to find programs without standardized exam barriers.

These diverse educational pathways allow students to tailor their journey in healthcare, whether their interests are clinical, administrative, or technical.

Best Scientists Citing Warren J. Manning

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles