World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 140 1689 1565 976 893 878 76132

Peter J. Kahrilas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter J. Kahrilas between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter J. Kahrilas published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 15.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 54 publications in 2014. 29 of the 922 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 54. Peak 54 publications in 2014. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 5 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 15 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 30 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 30 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 34 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 41 publications 2011: 45 publications 2012: 49 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 54 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 6 publications
1966 2025

922 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter J. Kahrilas: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 1
1986 5
1987 10
1988 3
1989 7
1990 9
1991 4
1992 7
1993 15
1994 13
1995 10
1996 12
1997 7
1998 14
1999 16
2000 30
2001 23
2002 12
2003 30
2004 16
2005 30
2006 15
2007 15
2008 34
2009 21
2010 41
2011 45
2012 49
2013 47
2014 54
2015 42
2016 33
2017 35
2018 30
2019 25
2020 24
2021 35
2022 35
2023 34
2024 23
2025 6
Total 922
Download as CSV

Peter J. Kahrilas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Kahrilas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 861–880 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 878 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155 878
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter J. Kahrilas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Kahrilas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 140–141 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134 140
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Peter J. Kahrilas is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on gastroenterology and surgery. Their research spans several subfields including speech and hearing, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their work mainly addresses topics such as gastroesophageal reflux and treatments, esophageal and gastrointestinal pathology, eosinophilic esophagitis, dysphagia assessment and management, Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies, esophageal cancer research and treatment, and respiratory and cough-related research.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter J. Kahrilas include:

  • John E. Pandolfino
  • Dustin A. Carlson
  • Wenjun Kou
  • Sourav Halder
  • Neelesh A. Patankar

They have published numerous papers in well-regarded journals with a strong presence in venues such as:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Selected recent papers include:

  • Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©, 2020, Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Personalized Approach to the Evaluation and Management of GERD: Expert Review, 2022, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Advances in the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease, 2020, BMJ
  • ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease, 2020, Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • What is new in Chicago Classification version 4.0?, 2020, Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Peter J. Kahrilas has been recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • The Montreal Definition and Classification of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Global Evidence-Based Consensus

    Nimish Vakil;Sander V van Zanten;Peter Kahrilas;John Dent

  • The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

    P J Kahrilas;A J Bredenoord;Mark Fox;C P Gyawali

  • An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management — the Genval Workshop Report

    J. Brun;A. M. Fendrick;M. B. Fennerty

  • Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus

    C Prakash Gyawali;Peter J Kahrilas;Edoardo Savarino;Frank Zerbib

  • Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux

    Daniel Sifrim;D Castell;P J Kahrilas

  • Chicago Classification Criteria of Esophageal Motility Disorders Defined in High Resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography

    A. J. Bredenoord;M. Fox;P. J. Kahrilas;J. E. Pandolfino

  • Achalasia: A New Clinically Relevant Classification by High-Resolution Manometry

    John E. Pandolfino;Monika A. Kwiatek;Thomas Nealis;William Bulsiewicz

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

    Peter J. Kahrilas

  • American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

    Peter J. Kahrilas;Nicholas J. Shaheen;Michael F. Vaezi

  • Esophageal Peristaltic Dysfunction in Peptic Esophagitis

    P.J. Kahrilas;W.J. Dodds;W.J. Hogan;M. Kern

  • Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance.

    Peter J Kahrilas;Peter J Kahrilas;W. J. Dodds;W. J. Dodds;W. J. Hogan;W. J. Hogan

  • Functional esophageal disorders.

    Jean Paul Galmiche;Ray E. Clouse;András Bálint;Ian J. Cook

  • Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©

    Rena Yadlapati;Peter J. Kahrilas;Mark R. Fox;Albert J. Bredenoord

  • Obesity: a challenge to esophagogastric junction integrity.

    John E. Pandolfino;Hashem B. El–Serag;Qing Zhang;Nimeesh Shah

  • Clinical esophageal pH recording: A technical review for practice guideline development

    Peter J Kahrilas;Eamonn M.M Quigley

  • Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing

    R. O. Dantas;M. K. Kern;B. T. Massey;W. J. Dodds

  • Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.

    John E Pandolfino;Joel E Richter;Tina Ours;Jason M Guardino

  • Efficacy and safety of esomeprazole compared with omeprazole in GERD patients with erosive esophagitis: a randomized controlled trial

    Joel E. Richter;Peter J. Kahrilas;John Johanson;Paul Maton

  • AGA technical review on management of oropharyngeal dysphagia

    Ian J. Cook;Peter J. Kahrilas

  • Esomeprazole (40 mg) compared with lansoprazole (30 mg) in the treatment of erosive esophagitis

    Donald O Castell;Peter J Kahrilas;Joel E Richter;Nimish B Vakil

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. Pandolfino
John E. Pandolfino Northwestern University
Jeri A. Logemann
Jeri A. Logemann Northwestern University
Neelesh A. Patankar
Neelesh A. Patankar Northwestern University
Laurie Keefer
Laurie Keefer Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nathaniel J. Soper
Nathaniel J. Soper Northwestern University
Walter J. Hogan
Walter J. Hogan Medical College of Wisconsin
Joel E. Richter
Joel E. Richter University of South Florida
Colin W. Howden
Colin W. Howden University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Nimish Vakil
Nimish Vakil University of Wisconsin–Madison
Wylie J. Dodds
Wylie J. Dodds Medical College of Wisconsin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medical education but seeking flexible learning options, online nursing and healthcare programs can offer rewarding alternatives and career pathways. The growing demand for healthcare professionals has made online degrees popular for both aspiring and practicing nurses.

Many students begin their journey with a nursing degree online, which covers foundational healthcare knowledge and clinical skills. For registered nurses aiming to advance their education and career prospects, affordable rn to bsn online programs allow RNs to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing with minimal disruption to their work schedules.

Becoming a nurse practitioner is another excellent option for those interested in advanced practice roles. There are several affordable online fnp programs that prepare students for the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) certification and diverse clinical opportunities.

For nursing professionals who wish to pursue research, teaching, or leadership positions, phd in nursing online programs provide a convenient path to earning a doctoral degree while balancing career and family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Kahrilas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles