World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
50
Citations
10326
World Ranking
3820
National Ranking
1342

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
56
Citations
12027
World Ranking
1897
National Ranking
905

Michael J. Manfredo publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Manfredo sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 133 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Michael J. Manfredo D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Manfredo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Manfredo is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with a strong emphasis on wildlife ecology and conservation. Over the course of their career, they have contributed 24 publications to this field, exploring various interconnected subfields such as ecology, global and planetary change, social psychology, ecological modeling, and aspects of management, monitoring, policy, and law.

The main topics they have explored include wildlife ecology and conservation, animal and plant science education, forest management and policy, species distribution and climate change, geographies of human-animal interactions, conservation ecology, wildlife education, and economic and environmental valuation.

Michael J. Manfredo has authored several papers published in notable academic venues. Some of the recent works include:

  • The changing sociocultural context of wildlife conservation (2020), Conservation Biology
  • Social value shift in favour of biodiversity conservation in the United States (2020), Nature Sustainability
  • Bringing social values to wildlife conservation decisions (2021), Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
  • Integrating social science into conservation planning (2021), Biological Conservation
  • Evaluating alternative survey methodologies in human dimensions of wildlife research (2022), Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Their frequent co-authors consist of Tara L. Teel, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, Leeann Sullivan, Richard E. W. Berl, and Andrew W. Don Carlos. The scholar often publishes in several prominent venues, including Conservation Science and Practice, Nature Sustainability, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Biodiversity and Conservation, and Conservation Biology.

This profile highlights a body of work founded on integrating social science perspectives into environmental and wildlife conservation efforts, as well as applying ecological and policy-related approaches to address current issues in conservation biology and related disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Measuring Leisure Motivation: A Meta-Analysis of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales

    Michael J. Manfredo;B. L. Driver;Michael A. Tarrant

  • Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach

    David C. Fulton;Michael J. Manfredo;James Lipscomb

  • Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation.

    Tara L. Teel;Michael J. Manfredo

  • Linking Society and Environment: A Multilevel Model of Shifting Wildlife Value Orientations in the Western United States*

    Michael J. Manfredo;Tara L. Teel;Kimberly L. Henry

  • Concepts for Exploring the Social Aspects of Human–Wildlife Conflict in a Global Context

    Michael J. Manfredo;Ashley A. Dayer

  • Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation.

    Michael J. Manfredo;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Tara L. Teel;David C. Fulton

  • Why Are Public Values Toward Wildlife Changing

    Michael Manfredo;Tara Teel;Alan Bright

  • Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions

    Harry C. Zinn;Michael J. Manfredo;Jerry J. Vaske;Karin Wittmann

  • Opinion: Governing the recreational dimension of global fisheries.

    Robert Arlinghaus;Robert Arlinghaus;Joshua K. Abbott;Eli P. Fenichel;Stephen R. Carpenter

  • A test of concepts inherent in experience based setting management for outdoor recreation areas.

    Michael J. Manfredo;B. L. Driver;Perry J. Brown

  • Specificity and the Cognitive Hierarchy: Value Orientations and the Acceptability of Urban Wildlife Management Actions

    Doug Whittaker;Jerry J. Vaske;Michael J. Manfredo

  • Who Cares About Wildlife?: Social Science Concepts for Exploring Human-Wildlife Relationships and Conservation Issues

    Michael J. Manfredo

  • Application of the theory of reasoned action to the National Park Service's controlled burn policy.

    Alan D. Bright;Michael J. Manfredo;Martin Fishbein;Alistair Bath

  • Who Cares About Wildlife

    Michael J Manfredo

  • A conceptual model of attitudes toward natural resource issues: A case study of wolf reintroduction

    Alan D. Bright;Michael J. Manfredo

  • Implications of human value shift and persistence for biodiversity conservation

    Michael J. Manfredo;Tara L. Teel;Alia M. Dietsch

  • Segmenting the public: an application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado

    Alan D. Bright;Michael J. Manfredo;David C. Fulton

  • Attitudes toward prescribed fire policies.

    Michael J. Manfredo;Martin Fishbein;Glenn E. Haas;Alan E. Watson

  • The Need and Theoretical Basis for Exploring Wildlife Value Orientations Cross-Culturally

    Tara L. Teel;Michael J. Manfredo;Holly M. Stinchfield

  • Values, trust, and cultural backlash in conservation governance: The case of wildlife management in the United States

    Michael J. Manfredo;Tara L. Teel;Leeann Sullivan;Alia M. Dietsch

  • A model for assessing the effects of communication on recreationists.

    Michael J. Manfredo;Alan D. Bright

Frequent Co-Authors

Tara L. Teel
Tara L. Teel Colorado State University
Jerry J. Vaske
Jerry J. Vaske Colorado State University
Jeremy T. Bruskotter
Jeremy T. Bruskotter The Ohio State University
Robert Arlinghaus
Robert Arlinghaus Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Shinobu Kitayama
Shinobu Kitayama University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Daniel J. Decker
Daniel J. Decker Cornell University
Ray Hilborn
Ray Hilborn University of Washington
Shalom H. Schwartz
Shalom H. Schwartz Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Shigehiro Oishi
Shigehiro Oishi University of Chicago
Ayse K. Uskul
Ayse K. Uskul University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA offers a wide range of degree options and professional paths, many of which can now be pursued conveniently online. For those interested in mental health services, enrolling in cacrep accredited programs online is a crucial step for building a strong foundation in counseling and meeting industry standards.

Specialized roles—such as supporting families and couples—may require an online masters in marriage and family therapy. This pathway prepares graduates for licensure and effective practice in diverse settings.

For those at the undergraduate level, a bachelor of science in psychology provides a strong introduction to human behavior, research methods, and foundational psychological theories useful across many careers.

Aspiring social workers can explore the easiest msw program options, offering a more accessible route to entering the profession. Each of these online degree programs can open doors to rewarding careers in counseling, research, social work, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Manfredo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles