World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
58
Citations
13632
World Ranking
1330
National Ranking
32

Inderjit publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inderjit sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 142 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Inderjit D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inderjit sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

Inderjit focuses on Allelopathy, Ecology, Botany, Bioassay and Ecosystem. His Allelopathy study is related to the wider topic of Agronomy. His work on Introduced species, Invasive species, Soil biology and Ecology as part of general Ecology study is frequently linked to Biological evolution, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.

His research brings together the fields of Edaphic and Botany. His work carried out in the field of Bioassay brings together such families of science as Biotechnology and Germination. His Ecosystem research incorporates themes from Photosynthesis, Plant species and Ageratina.

His most cited work include:

  • Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants (429 citations)
  • Ecophysiological aspects of allelopathy (420 citations)
  • Plant phenolics in allelopathy (351 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Allelopathy, Botany, Agronomy, Ecology and Weed. His Allelopathy study combines topics in areas such as Perennial plant, Soil water, Bioassay and Seedling. The Botany study combines topics in areas such as Rhizosphere and Competition.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Nutrient and Soil chemistry. The various areas that Inderjit examines in his Weed study include Rhizome, Agriculture, Weed control and Biological pest control. His work in the fields of Native plant overlaps with other areas such as Biological dispersal.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Allelopathy (53.39%)
  • Botany (36.44%)
  • Agronomy (35.59%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?

  • Ecology (34.75%)
  • Introduced species (11.86%)
  • Biodiversity (6.78%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Inderjit mostly deals with Ecology, Introduced species, Biodiversity, Species richness and Invasive species. He merges Ecology with Cretaceous in his research. His Introduced species study results in a more complete grasp of Botany.

His research integrates issues of Monoculture, Inoculation, Competition and Colonization in his study of Botany. His research in Biodiversity intersects with topics in Flora, Weed, Native plant, Tropics and Developing country. His work deals with themes such as Stellaria media, Carex, Species diversity and Persicaria, which intersect with Species richness.

Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants (429 citations)
  • Naturalized alien flora of the world: species diversity, taxonomic and phylogenetic patterns, geographic distribution and global hotspots of plant invasion (155 citations)
  • New pasture plants intensify invasive species risk. (65 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Agriculture

His main research concerns Introduced species, Ecology, Invasive species, Species richness and Plant soil. His Introduced species study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Agriculture, Livestock, Environmental impact assessment and Agricultural science. His research on Ecology frequently links to adjacent areas such as Botany.

Inderjit combines subjects such as Agroforestry, Stellaria media, Weed, Weed control and Sustainability with his study of Invasive species. Inderjit interconnects Biodiversity, Flora and Native plant in the investigation of issues within Species richness. His Plant soil research includes elements of Plant ecology, Plant community, Plant growth and Soil processes.

Best Publications

  • Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants

    Mark Van Kleunen;Wayne Dawson;Franz Essl;Jan Pergl

  • Ecophysiological aspects of allelopathy

    Inderjit;Stephen O. Duke

  • Challenges and opportunities in implementing allelopathy for natural weed management

    Prasanta C. Bhowmik;Inderjit

  • Naturalized alien flora of the world: species diversity, taxonomic and phylogenetic patterns, geographic distribution and global hotspots of plant invasion

    Petr Pyšek;Jan Pergl;Franz Essl;Bernd Lenzner

  • The ecosystem and evolutionary contexts of allelopathy

    Inderjit;David A. Wardle;Richard Karban;Ragan M. Callaway

  • Impacts of soil microbial communities on exotic plant invasions

    Inderjit;Wim H. van der Putten

  • Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versus cell walls in an invasive plant

    Yu-Long Feng;Yan-Bao Lei;Rui-Fang Wang;Ragan M. Callaway

  • Plant phenolics in allelopathy

    Inderjit

  • Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions

    J. Gurevitch;G. A. Fox;G. M. Wardle;Inderjit

  • Experimental designs for the study of allelopathy

    Inderjit;Ragan M. Callaway

  • Allelopathy : organisms, processes, and applications

    Inderjit;K. M. M. Dakshini;Frank A. Einhellig

  • The Global Naturalized Alien Flora (GloNAF) database

    Mark van Kleunen;Petr Pyšek;Wayne Dawson;Franz Essl

  • Principles and practices in plant ecology : allelochemical interactions

    Inderjit;K. M. M. Dakshini;Chester L. Foy

  • On laboratory bioassays in allelopathy

    Inderjit;K. M. M. Dakshini

  • Soil microorganisms: An important determinant of allelopathic activity

    Inderjit

  • Plant allelochemical interference or soil chemical ecology

    Inderjit;Jacob Weiner

  • Is separating resource competition from allelopathy realistic

    Roger del Moral

  • Allelopathy and plant invasions: traditional, congeneric, and bio-geographical approaches

    Inderjit;Timothy R. Seastedt;Ragan M. Callaway;Jarrod L. Pollock

  • Taking ecological function seriously: soil microbial communities can obviate allelopathic effects of released metabolites.

    Harleen Kaur;Rajwant Kaur;Surinder Kaur;Ian T. Baldwin

  • Global models and predictions of plant diversity based on advanced machine learning techniques.

    Unknown

  • Can plant biochemistry contribute to understanding of invasion ecology

    Inderjit;Ragan M. Callaway;Jorge M. Vivanco

  • Allelopathy: Principles, Procedures, Processes, and Promises for Biological Control

    Inderjit;K.I. Keating

  • Volatile chemicals from leaf litter are associated with invasiveness of a Neotropical weed in Asia

    Inderjit;Heather Evans;Christoph Crocoll;Devika Bajpai

  • Allelopathic effect of Pluchea lanceolata (Asteraceae) on characteristics of four soils and tomato and mustard growth

    Inderjit;K. M. M. Dakshini

  • Effect of phenolic compounds on selected soil properties

    Inderjit;A.U. Mallik

  • Challenges, achievements and opportunities in allelopathy research

    Inderjit;Leslie A Weston;Stephen O Duke

Frequent Co-Authors

Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences
Ragan M. Callaway
Ragan M. Callaway University of Montana
Azim U. Mallik
Azim U. Mallik Lakehead University
Mark van Kleunen
Mark van Kleunen University of Konstanz
Frank A. Einhellig
Frank A. Einhellig Missouri State University
Jane A. Catford
Jane A. Catford King's College London
Jan Pergl
Jan Pergl Czech Academy of Sciences
Chester L. Foy
Chester L. Foy Virginia Tech
Wen-Sheng Shu
Wen-Sheng Shu South China Normal University
Patrick Weigelt
Patrick Weigelt University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Inderjit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles