World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
10410
World Ranking
8499
National Ranking
523

Claas Teichmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claas Teichmann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 76 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Claas Teichmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claas Teichmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claas Teichmann is affiliated with the Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research in Germany. Their research broadly covers environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a significant focus on global and planetary change as well as atmospheric science.

Their work involves examining climate variability and models alongside meteorological phenomena and simulations. They have explored topics such as atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, cryospheric studies and observations, hydrology and drought analysis, tropical and extratropical cyclones research, and plant water relations and carbon dynamics.

Teichmann has contributed to a range of scientific publications, with recent papers including:

  • "Regional climate downscaling over Europe: perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community" (2020, Regional Environmental Change)
  • "Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble" (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)
  • "Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble" (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)
  • "Climate hazard indices projections based on CORDEX-CORE, CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble" (2021, Climate Dynamics)
  • "Analysis of Compound Climate Extremes and Exposed Population in Africa Under Two Different Emission Scenarios" (2020, Earth's Future)

The scientist has frequently collaborated with colleagues such as Daniela Jacob, Erika Coppola, Diana Rechid, Katharina Bülow, and Jesús Fernández.

Teichmann has published multiple articles in several respected venues, including:

  • Climate Dynamics
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Earth's Future
  • Research Square

Best Publications

  • EURO-CORDEX : new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research

    Daniela Jacob;Juliane Petersen;Bastian Eggert;Antoinette Alias

  • Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble

    S. Kotlarski;K. Keuler;O. B. Christensen;A. Colette

  • Future global meteorological drought hot spots: A study based on CORDEX data

    Jonathan Spinoni;Paulo Barbosa;Edoardo Bucchignani;John Cassano

  • The impact of climate change on photovoltaic power generation in Europe

    Sandra Jerez;Isabelle Tobin;Robert Vautard;Juan Pedro Montavez

  • The simulation of European heat waves from an ensemble of regional climate models within the EURO-CORDEX project

    Robert Vautard;Andreas Gobiet;Daniela Jacob;Michal Belda

  • The European climate under a 2 C global warming

    Robert Vautard;Andreas Gobiet;Stefan Sobolowski;Erik Kjellström

  • Regional climate downscaling over Europe: perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community

    Daniela Jacob;Claas Teichmann;Stefan Sobolowski;Eleni Katragkou

  • Precipitation in the EURO-CORDEX 0.11° and 0.44° simulations: high resolution, high benefits?

    A.F. Prein;A. Gobiet;H. Truhetz;K. Keuler

  • Assessing the Transferability of the Regional Climate Model REMO to Different COordinated Regional Climate Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX) Regions

    Daniela Jacob;Alberto Elizalde;Andreas Haensler;Stefan Hagemann

  • Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble

    Robert Vautard;Nikolay Kadygrov;Carley Iles;Fredrik Boberg

  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble

    Erika Coppola;Rita Nogherotto;James M. Ciarlo;Filippo Giorgi

  • European climate change at global mean temperature increases of 1.5 and 2 °C above pre-industrial conditions as simulated by the EURO-CORDEX regional climate models

    Erik Kjellström;Erik Kjellström;Grigory Nikulin;Gustav Strandberg;Ole Bøssing Christensen

  • Climate change impacts on the power generation potential of a European mid-century wind farms scenario

    Isabelle Tobin;Sonia Jerez;Robert Vautard;Françoise Thais

  • Climate Impacts in Europe Under +1.5°C Global Warming

    Daniela Jacob;Lola Kotova;Claas Teichmann;Stefan P. Sobolowski

  • Climate hazard indices projections based on CORDEX-CORE, CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble

    Erika Coppola;Francesca Raffaele;Filippo Giorgi;Graziano Giuliani

  • How does a regional climate model modify the projected climate change signal of the driving GCM: A study over different CORDEX regions using REMO

    Claas Teichmann;Bastian Eggert;Alberto Elizalde;Andreas Haensler

  • Future Changes in European Severe Convection Environments in a Regional Climate Model Ensemble

    Tomáš Púčik;Pieter Groenemeijer;Anja T. Rädler;Lars Tijssen

  • Daily precipitation statistics in a EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble: added value of raw and bias-corrected high-resolution simulations

    A. Casanueva;S. Kotlarski;S. Herrera;J. Fernandez

  • Analysis of Compound Climate Extremes and Exposed Population in Africa Under Two Different Emission Scenarios

    T. Weber;P. Bowyer;D. Rechid;S. Pfeifer

  • Land-atmosphere coupling in EURO-CORDEX evaluation experiments

    Sebastian Knist;Klaus Goergen;Erasmo Buonomo;Ole Bøssing Christensen

  • Assessing mean climate change signals in the global CORDEX-CORE ensemble

    Claas Teichmann;Daniela Jacob;Armelle Reca Remedio;Thomas Remke

  • A polarized discrete ordinate scattering model for simulations of limb and nadir long‐wave measurements in 1‐D/3‐D spherical atmospheres

    Claudia Emde;Stefan Buehler;C. Davis;Patrick Eriksson

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniela Jacob
Daniela Jacob Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Grigory Nikulin
Grigory Nikulin Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Robert Vautard
Robert Vautard École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Ole Bøssing Christensen
Ole Bøssing Christensen Danish Meteorological Institute
Sven Kotlarski
Sven Kotlarski Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology
Erika Coppola
Erika Coppola International Centre for Theoretical Physics
Augustin Colette
Augustin Colette Stanford University
Andreas Gobiet
Andreas Gobiet Central Institution for Meteorology and Geodynamics
Michel Déqué
Michel Déqué Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Filippo Giorgi
Filippo Giorgi International Centre for Theoretical Physics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Environmental Sciences, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Public administration plays a crucial role in environmental policy and management, making the best online MPA programs a valuable option. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles in government and nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability and conservation.

Understanding social dynamics is essential in addressing environmental issues, which makes a sociology bachelor degree online complementary to an environmental science background. This degree enhances skills in analyzing human behavior and societal impacts on the environment.

For those seeking advanced education, doctoral programs offer opportunities to specialize in environmental studies or related fields. The availability of doctoral programs online no dissertation provides flexible paths for working professionals interested in leadership or academic roles without the extensive commitment of a dissertation.

Educators and administrators aiming to incorporate environmental curriculum or sustainability practices can benefit from the best online EdS to EdD programs. These programs support career advancement in education with a focus on innovative, research-based strategies.

Best Scientists Citing Claas Teichmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles