World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
15081
World Ranking
3055
National Ranking
42

Erika Coppola publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erika Coppola sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 232 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Erika Coppola D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erika Coppola sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erika Coppola is affiliated with the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Italy and has contributed extensively to research in Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work encompasses a range of subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Geophysics, and Mechanics of Materials.

Their research focuses on topics such as Climate variability and models, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, and Cryospheric studies and observations.

Recent papers by Erika Coppola include:

  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)
  • Regional climate downscaling over Europe: perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community (2020, Regional Environmental Change)
  • The first multi-model ensemble of regional climate simulations at kilometer-scale resolution, part I: evaluation of precipitation (2021, Climate Dynamics)
  • Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)
  • Assessment of CMIP6 Performance and Projected Temperature and Precipitation Changes Over South America (2021, Earth Systems and Environment)

Erika Coppola frequently coauthors with researchers such as Filippo Giorgi, Rita Nogherotto, Hylke de Vries, Emanuela Pichelli, and Graziano Giuliani.

Their publications often appear in venues including:

  • Climate Dynamics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • Earth Systems and Environment

Best Publications

  • RegCM4 : model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains

    F. Giorgi;E. Coppola;F. Solmon;L. Mariotti

  • Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe

    Unknown

  • The European mountain cryosphere: a review of its current state, trends, and future challenges

    Martin Beniston;Daniel Farinotti;Daniel Farinotti;Markus Stoffel;Liss M. Andreassen

  • Future global meteorological drought hot spots: A study based on CORDEX data

    Jonathan Spinoni;Paulo Barbosa;Edoardo Bucchignani;John Cassano

  • Higher Hydroclimatic Intensity with Global Warming

    F. Giorgi;Eun Soon Im;Erika Coppola;N.S. Diffenbaugh

  • Regional climate downscaling over Europe: perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community

    Daniela Jacob;Claas Teichmann;Stefan Sobolowski;Eleni Katragkou

  • Med-CORDEX initiative for Mediterranean climate studies

    Paolo M. Ruti;Samuel Somot;F. Giorgi;Clotilde Dubois

  • Added value of regional climate modeling over areas characterized by complex terrain—Precipitation over the Alps

    Csaba Torma;Filippo Giorgi;Erika Coppola

  • A first-of-its-kind multi-model convection permitting ensemble for investigating convective phenomena over Europe and the Mediterranean

    Erika Coppola;Stefan Sobolowski;E. Pichelli;F. Raffaele

  • The response of precipitation characteristics to global warming from climate projections

    Filippo Giorgi;Francesca Raffaele;Erika Coppola

  • The first multi-model ensemble of regional climate simulations at kilometer-scale resolution, part I: evaluation of precipitation

    Nikolina Ban;Cécile Caillaud;Erika Coppola;Emanuela Pichelli

  • Uncertainties in daily rainfall over Africa: assessment of gridded observation products and evaluation of a regional climate model simulation

    M. B. Sylla;F. Giorgi;E. Coppola;L. Mariotti

  • Enhanced summer convective rainfall at Alpine high elevations in response to climate warming

    Filippo Giorgi;Csaba Torma;Erika Coppola;Nikolina Ban

  • Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble

    Robert Vautard;Nikolay Kadygrov;Carley Iles;Fredrik Boberg

  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble

    Erika Coppola;Rita Nogherotto;James M. Ciarlo;Filippo Giorgi

  • Assessment of CMIP6 performance and projected temperature and precipitation changes over South America

    Mansour Almazroui;Mansour Almazroui;Moetasim Ashfaq;M. Nazrul Islam;Irfan Ur Rashid

  • Resolution effects on regional climate model simulations of seasonal precipitation over Europe

    Sara A. Rauscher;Erika Coppola;Claudio Piani;Filippo Giorgi

  • The first multi-model ensemble of regional climate simulations at kilometer-scale resolution part 2: historical and future simulations of precipitation

    Emanuela Pichelli;Erika Coppola;Stefan Sobolowski;Nikolina Ban

  • Multiyear simulation of the African climate using a regional climate model (RegCM3) with the high resolution ERA-interim reanalysis

    Mouhamadou Bamba Sylla;E. Coppola;L. Mariotti;L. Mariotti;F. Giorgi

  • Climate hazard indices projections based on CORDEX-CORE, CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble

    Erika Coppola;Francesca Raffaele;Filippo Giorgi;Graziano Giuliani

  • Changes in extremes and hydroclimatic regimes in the CREMA ensemble projections

    Filippo Giorgi;Erika Coppola;Francesca Raffaele;Gulilat Tefera Diro

  • The first multi-model ensemble of regional climate simulations at kilometer-scale resolution, Part I: Evaluation of precipitation

    Nikolina Ban;Erwan Brisson;Cécile Caillaud;Erika Coppola

Frequent Co-Authors

Filippo Giorgi
Filippo Giorgi International Centre for Theoretical Physics
Moetasim Ashfaq
Moetasim Ashfaq Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Claas Teichmann
Claas Teichmann Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Daniela Jacob
Daniela Jacob Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Eleni Katragkou
Eleni Katragkou Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Xuejie Gao
Xuejie Gao Chinese Academy of Sciences
Samuel Somot
Samuel Somot Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Pedro M. M. Soares
Pedro M. M. Soares University of Lisbon
Ole Bøssing Christensen
Ole Bøssing Christensen Danish Meteorological Institute
Rita M. Cardoso
Rita M. Cardoso University of Lisbon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students studying Environmental Sciences in the USA often explore related online degrees to broaden their expertise and career opportunities. For those interested in public policy and administration, pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration can be a strategic move. It equips graduates to influence environmental regulations and manage sustainable projects at governmental or nonprofit levels.

Many environmental professionals also benefit from understanding social dynamics, making online sociology bachelor programs an excellent complementary option. This knowledge helps address community impacts of environmental changes and promotes more effective advocacy work.

For those aiming to reach the highest academic levels without traditional dissertation hurdles, exploring doctorate degree online no dissertation options allows professionals to advance their credentials flexibly while balancing work and life commitments.

Continuing education pathways, such as eds to edd programs, also provide tailored growth for educators focusing on environmental science education or leadership roles, blending expertise with leadership skills.

Best Scientists Citing Erika Coppola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles